Britain tries to reassure bloggers on new press rules

March 20, 2013 by Robin Millard
This file photo shows copies of the now defunct Rupert Murdoch-owned News of the World tabloid, pictured in London, on July 7, 2011. The government has insisted that bloggers and posts on social media would not be caught by a new system of press regulation, but campaigners warned the new rules could be open to interpretation.

The British government has insisted that bloggers and posts on social media would not be caught by a new system of press regulation, but campaigners warned the new rules could be open to interpretation.

Britain's newspapers are urgently considering whether to sign up to the new system agreed by on Monday in the wake of a phone-hacking scandal at the now defunct -owned News of the World tabloid.

The new watchdog, underpinned by law, would have the power to issue harsh sanctions on misbehaving publications, including fines of up to 1 million pounds ($1.5 million, 1.2 million euros).

While the Leveson Inquiry into press standards resulting from the hacking scandal did not cover online publishing, the new royal charter hammered out by political leaders specifically covers "news-related" websites too, sparking uncertainty.

In recent years, the authorities have taken a growing interest in prosecuting people for comments made on the Internet.

Meanwhile newspapers have railed that details of preventing them from publishing stories about celebrities have been openly circulated online, effectively making a mockery of the rulings.

Though the Department for Culture, Media and Sport stressed that small-scale and comments on and Facebook would not be subject to the new royal charter regulating publishers, campaigners feared that the new system could still be ambiguous.

"It won't affect bloggers," a DCMS spokesman told AFP.

"What Leveson was talking about was newspapers—national and local—and newspaper-type websites. It's not people who are writing a blog."

To be considered a news publisher under the charter, outlets must meet each of three tests.

A member of the press holds copies of the Leveson Inquiry into press standards after its publication following a major inquiry set up in the wake of the News Of The World phone-hacking scandal, in London, on November 29, 2012. The government has insisted that bloggers and posts on social media would not be caught by a new system of press regulation.

They must be "publishing in the course of business"; publish news-related material written by a range of authors; and be subject to editorial control.

National and local papers and their online editions fall under the remit, as do lifestyle magazines and "online-only edited 'press-like' content providers", such as the Huffington Post, said the DCMS.

Those outside the boundary include "news aggregators and social networking sites", small special interest publishers, student and not-for-profit community newspapers, scientific journals and broadcasters' websites, such as the BBC's online arm.

"Ultimately, it is a matter for the court to decide on the definition of a relevant publisher based on assessment of the facts, in accordance with the three interlocking tests (course of business, range of authors and editorial control)," DCMS said.

"But if material isn't subject to editorial control it shouldn't be caught."

The new will also be able to force publications to issue upfront apologies for inaccurate or intrusive stories, as well as offering a free arbitration system for victims.

Political party leaders say it will rein in the kind of misdeeds exposed by the News of the World tabloid without curbing press freedom.

Despite the reassurances, some are worried about the knock-on effects the new plans could have on Internet news and comment.

Kirsty Hughes, chief executive of the Index on Censorship freedom of expression campaign body, said Tuesday that despite the politicians' claims, the "loose definition" of a publisher would "undoubtedly have a chilling effect on everyday people's web use".

"Bloggers could find themselves subject to exemplary damages in court... This mess of legislation has been thrown together with alarming haste: there's little doubt we'll repent for a while to come."

Paul Staines, who runs the well-respected Guido Fawkes blog about British politics, argued that the new plans were unworkable.

"I don't see how they can regulate the worldwide web when the servers are based in other countries," he told BBC radio.

"My servers are in California. Are they going to send the royal navy gunboats to North Beach, California to pound the servers?

"They could come after me individually but I think they would have little chance of success.

"The prime minister's spokeswoman said I wouldn't be regulated. Everybody else, lawyers, say that I will be regulated.

"How can you regulate somebody who doesn't want to be regulated and doesn't have bricks and mortar in the UK?"

In reference to the deal struck by politicians in the early hours, he added: "When you draft legislation at two in the morning, you are going to get shambolic results."

Explore further: Wall Street Journal attacks News Corp. critics

Related Stories

Wall Street Journal attacks News Corp. critics

July 18, 2011

The News Corp.-owned Wall Street Journal blasted critics Monday for double standards and insisted that the phone-tapping scandal in Britain should not tarnish all of Rupert Murdoch's media empire.

UK judge: Social network sites differ from press

January 27, 2012

(AP) -- The British judge presiding over a wide-ranging inquiry into media ethics and practices has suggested that social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter should be seen differently than traditional publishers.

British police arrest 5 in tabloid bribery probe

January 29, 2012

(AP) -- The criminal investigation into British tabloid skullduggery turned full force on a second Rupert Murdoch publication Saturday, with the arrest of four current and former journalists from The Sun on suspicion of ...

UK hacking scandal spreads, 100-plus new claims (Update)

July 23, 2012

(AP) — British police are investigating new tabloids in the country's growing phone hacking scandal, including the Trinity Mirror PLC newspaper group as well as the U.K.'s Express Newspapers, a senior Scotland Yard official ...

Same laws must apply to bloggers, tweeters: Leveson

December 13, 2012

The man who led the inquiry into Britain's phone-hacking scandal has warned that bloggers and tweeters should be subject to the same laws as traditional media outlets to prevent a decline in standards of journalism.

Recommended for you

Power grid forecasting tool reduces costly errors

July 30, 2015

Accurately forecasting future electricity needs is tricky, with sudden weather changes and other variables impacting projections minute by minute. Errors can have grave repercussions, from blackouts to high market costs. ...

Netherlands bank customers can get vocal on payments

August 1, 2015

Are some people fed up with remembering and using passwords and PINs to make it though the day? Those who have had enough would prefer to do without them. For mobile tasks that involve banking, though, it is obvious that ...

Microsoft describes hard-to-mimic authentication gesture

August 1, 2015

Photos. Messages. Bank account codes. And so much more—sit on a person's mobile device, and the question is, how to secure them without having to depend on lengthy password codes of letters and numbers. Vendors promoting ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rsklyar
1 / 5 (1) Mar 25, 2013
The British government should focus on the stealing swindlers at their Universities - https://connect.i...sr/blogs

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.