Multijunction solar cell could exceed 50% efficiency goal

Feb 20, 2013 by Lisa Zyga feature
The new multijunction solar cell design has three subcells that each have different band gaps to absorb different parts of the solar spectrum. The scientists focused on improving the current match and the lattice match among the subcells to achieve the highest simulated efficiency for this type of solar cell to date. Credit: Marina S. Leite, et al. ©2013 American Institute of Physics

(Phys.org)—Scientists have designed a new multijunction solar cell that, in simulations, can achieve an efficiency of 51.8%. This high performance exceeds the current goal of 50% efficiency in multijunction solar cell research as well as the current world record of 43.5% for a 3-junction solar cell.

The work was performed by a collaboration of researchers from the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena; the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Gaithersburg, Maryland; the University of Maryland in College Park; and Boeing-Spectrolab, Inc., in Sylmar, California. The team published a paper on their work in a recent issue of Applied Physics Letters.

As the researchers explain, multijunction are one of the most promising devices for efficiently converting sunlight into electricity. In multijunction solar cells, each junction or subcell absorbs and converts sunlight from a specific region of the spectrum. The subcells can be stacked on top of one another so that sunlight first strikes the highest subcell, which is tuned to light with the shortest wavelengths or highest energies. The longer wavelengths pass through the first subcell and strike the lower bandgap subcells.

This arrangement offers a significant advantage over single-junction solar cells, which have a maximum theoretical efficiency of only 34%. In theory, an "infinite-junction" solar cell has a maximum theoretical efficiency of almost 87%. But to approach this level, multijunction solar cells not only need multiple subcells, but optimal semiconductor materials for the subcells to provide a combination of band gaps that cover as much of the as possible.

To improve upon the current best multijunction solar cells, the researchers here focused on improving the current match between the different subcells, along with using a lattice-matched design. Both of these factors have previously limited multijunction .

"The lattice match corresponds to the matching between the crystal unit cells from the different subcells," lead author Marina Leite, an energy researcher at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, told Phys.org. "By using subcells that are lattice-matched, we can minimize dislocations and other crystal defects that can significantly affect the performance of the device. A current match is required for two-terminal tandem configurations because in this case a single current passes through all the subcells and the voltages are added; therefore, if one subcell has less photocurrent it will limit the current generated by the entire device. The current match is desired so that each individual subcell works at its own maximum power point of operation."

The researchers performed full-device simulations to investigate the solar cell's potential efficiency. For every layer in the modeling, they considered numerous factors, such as material composition, lattice constant, thickness, dielectric constant, electron affinity, band gap, effective conduction and valence band densities, electron and hole motilities, the doping concentration of shallow acceptors and donors, the thermal velocity of electrons and holes, the alloy density, Auger recombination for electrons and holes, direct band-to-band recombination, and how many photons with a specific wavelength are absorbed and reflected by each layer based on its dielectric properties.

Accounting for all these factors, the simulations showed that the 3-junction design could achieve an efficiency of 51.8% under 100-suns illumination, a great improvement over the current best 43.5% efficiency under 418-suns illumination. All three subcells in the new design had a maximum external quantum efficiency of 80% and absorbed light from a wide range of the spectrum.

"The multijunction solar cells are tested under different numbers of suns because they are often used in concentrator photovoltaic systems, which allow us to reduce the size or number of cells needed," Leite explained. "These strategies tolerate the use of more expensive , which would otherwise be cost-prohibitive. The results can certainly be compared with each other, as long as the illumination sources are well calibrated."

The researchers also built a proof-of-principle solar cell with an equivalent design, which they fabricated on an indium phosphide (InP) substrate. The solar cell was not optimized, so its efficiency was far from the theoretical prediction, but the results nevertheless demonstrated the capability of experimentally realizing the design. The scientists predict that, with further improvements, this equivalent 3-junction solar cell could have a practical efficiency of around 20% under 1-sun illumination.

"[The fabricated solar cell] presents a poor current match but demonstrates our capability of growing high quality semiconductor compounds with an extremely low density of defects and stoichiometry very close to what is required for the optimized design," Leite said. "The bandgap-optimized design is formed by the same class of alloys, and has a great current match. So, upon optimization of anti-reflection coatings and other design parameters, the simulations indicate that one can reach greater than 50% under concentrated sunlight."

In addition to an optimized anti-reflection coating, some of the other improvements may involve adding window and back surface layers to reduce loss and thickening the lower two subcells to absorb long wavelength light more completely.

"I am very excited about our initial results concerning a bandgap-optimized design," Leite said. "In the near future I plan to work on the integration of the optimized design into the single crystal template in order to fabricate a first monolithic (1.93 eV)InAlAs/(1.39 eV) InGaAsP/(0.94 eV)InGaAs solar cell. Simultaneously, we are looking into anti-reflection coating options for the InAlAs top subcell, which will require an oxygen-free material or the combination of an oxide and a sulfide as a protective layer."

Explore further: Shaping the future of energy storage with conductive clay

More information: Marina S. Leite, et al. "Towards an optimized all lattice-matched InAlAs/InGaAsP/InGaAs multijunction solar cell with efficiency >50%." Applied Physics Letters 102, 033901 (2013)

Journal reference: Applied Physics Letters search and more info website

4.3 /5 (31 votes)

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Nanomaterials to preserve ancient works of art

1 hour ago

Little would we know about history if it weren't for books and works of art. But as time goes by, conserving this evidence of the past is becoming more and more of a struggle. Could this all change thanks ...

Learning anti-microbial physics from cicada

1 hour ago

(Phys.org) —Inspired by the wing structure of a small fly, an NPL-led research team developed nano-patterned surfaces that resist bacterial adhesion while supporting the growth of human cells.

User comments : 14

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tscati
4.2 / 5 (11) Feb 20, 2013
51.8% efficiency? - Pah, that's nothing! In my simulation of my new 17 junction cell I get an efficiency of 164.2% (although I think there may be a bug in my simulation, to be honest....)

Please get one working before blowing the trumpets.
Modernmystic
3.2 / 5 (10) Feb 20, 2013
Please get one working before blowing the trumpets.


OMG no kidding! If I had a penny for every one of these stories I've seen I'd be Bill Gates...
JRi
1 / 5 (1) Feb 20, 2013
A bit unclear. It the 43.5% device also simulated number or measurement from a working device? In case a real thing, what would their simulations show the theoretical maximum in that case?
supersubie
5 / 5 (3) Feb 20, 2013
We get these new breakthroughs in solar tech every week! Just never seems to be passed on and actually amount to anything!
dschlink
1 / 5 (4) Feb 20, 2013
The 43.5% is for a laboratory device built by Solar Junction. It runs at 400 suns concentration.

Going from lab to commercially viable quantities isn't easy or fast. It's not like tossing out a new video game.
Parsec
3 / 5 (1) Feb 20, 2013
We get these new breakthroughs in solar tech every week! Just never seems to be passed on and actually amount to anything!

That is actually untrue. The measured efficiency of actual devices continues to improve year over year. This is true of both very inexpensive devices and very expensive ones that are economically practical (even at very high efficiency) when illuminated with concentrated sunlight.
baudrunner
1 / 5 (2) Feb 20, 2013
Ruby laser efficiency was increased merely by coating the emitting end of the ruby rod with a one way mirror-like coating. Just utilizing this improvement would probably increase the efficiency of the solar cell substantially.
Shakescene21
4 / 5 (1) Feb 20, 2013
Multijunction photovoltaics are definitely the way of the future. The cost of solar panels has been dropping so much that it makes sense to stack them to absorb as much light as possible. (Nowadays, the non-panel costs of photovoltaic systems are usually the bigger cost component.)
Frostiken
3.7 / 5 (3) Feb 20, 2013
If we combined every 'breakthrough' solar technology I've read about on this site, we'd currently have solar cells the size and cost of a postage stamp that can power your house. At night.
VendicarE
5 / 5 (1) Feb 21, 2013
The way this article and virtually every article announcing "new technology" provided here, should be read is as an indication of what is possible, and where research is trending.

There has been a steady improvement in PV efficiency over the decades, and a steady decline in PV prices, especially over the last decade thanks to new production methods that China has exploited for it's automated production lines.

This article tells us that there is now an over 50% efficiency possible in PV power generation and that there is a detailed physical model which provides a detailed description of how to get there.

If it is practical or economical is another question. If the production model needs to be modified, is another question.

When it comes to followups. Bad news is now news.
djr
5 / 5 (2) Feb 21, 2013
If you guys don't like reading about cutting edge science - here's a novel idea - don't do it. I like reading about the cutting edge - it is a bit like Khosla et al with their investment capitol. They know a certain percentage of ideas pan out - and a certain percentage don't. They are willing to take the risk for the potential reward. As Vendi points out - look at how far we have come in a very short time with PV - and there is still a long way to go.
Modernmystic
1 / 5 (1) Feb 22, 2013
If you guys don't like reading about cutting edge science - here's a novel idea - don't do it. I like reading about the cutting edge - it is a bit like Khosla et al with their investment capitol. They know a certain percentage of ideas pan out - and a certain percentage don't. They are willing to take the risk for the potential reward. As Vendi points out - look at how far we have come in a very short time with PV - and there is still a long way to go.


If you mean someone repeating over and over that they've found ways to improve solar panels and we never really see any benefits as cutting edge science I suppose you and I will have to agree to disagree on the definition...
djr
not rated yet Feb 22, 2013
If you mean someone repeating over and over that they've found ways to improve solar panels and we never really see any benefits as cutting edge science I suppose you and I will have to agree to disagree on the definition...

No - I mean watching the efficiency of solar panels go up - and the cost of the panels come down - benefiting all of us greatly. Perhaps you could read some articles on how much they have improved over the past 20 years.
frostedpanda
1 / 5 (1) Mar 05, 2013
Best efficiency would be using a stack of increasingly larger carbon nanotube coated silicon micro-rings..electromagnetism is spherical so it would make sense to use this physicality in the design, then i think 87% may be approachable.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.