Megaupload wants piracy charges dismissed

Jun 02, 2012

Megaupload has filed papers in US District Court to dismiss the federal government's massive online piracy case against the file-sharing website and its founder, Kim Dotcom.

"Megaupload believes that the US didn't follow the rules," Megaupload and Dotcom lawyer Ira Rothken told AFP, stressing that the company was based in Hong Kong.

"The rules in this instance didn't allow a foreign corporation to be served and indicted as it has not have a presence in the US. We believe the law is clear in that issue, and we're asking the court to dismiss the case."

Megaupload's lawyers filed a motion on Wednesday urging the court to dismiss the charges against the company and executives.

The US indictment alleges Megaupload and related file-sharing sites netted more than $175 million and cost copyright owners more than $500 million by offering pirated copies of movies, TV shows and other content. US authorities allege Dotcom earned $42 million from his file-sharing websites in 2010 alone.

"The court should dismiss the indictment against Megaupload to prevent any further injustice," the company's filing said.

"Megaupload now finds itself in a state of abeyance, with no end in sight."

It also called for authorities to unfreeze the website's assets so that the company can pay the 30 lawyers who have assured its defense for free from New Zealand to the United States, as well as in Hong Kong, Canada and Europe.

A hearing to examine the request is due to be held June 29 at the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in the city of Alexandria. The judge's ruling could impact an August extradition hearing in .

"There's no to keep Megaupload's assets frozen, and we believe that the court is going to make a reasonable amount of assets available to pay defense costs," Rothken said.

US authorities have seized $50 million in Megaupload assets.

Dotcom and his co-defendants, who were arrested when New Zealand police raided the Internet tycoon's sprawling Auckland mansion on January 20, deny any wrongdoing and have vowed to fight the charges.

They are on bail as they await a bid in August to extradite them to the United States.

, who legally changed his name from Kim Schmitz, has denied any wrongdoing and vowed to fight , labeling the case against him "misleading and malicious."

Explore further: Digital dilemma: How will US respond to Sony hack?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Megaupload boss allowed $49,000 monthly expenses

Mar 22, 2012

A New Zealand court granted Megaupload boss Kim Dotcom NZ$60,000 ($49,000) a month in living expenses Thursday as he awaits a US bid to extradite him on online piracy charges, reports said.

Decision due in Megaupload founder's N.Z. bail bid

Jan 24, 2012

Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom is set to learn Wednesday if he will remain behind bars in New Zealand while US authorities seek his extradition on allegations of massive copyright theft.

Megaupload boss to appeal for bail in New Zealand

Feb 02, 2012

Megaupload boss Kim Dotcom will appeal Friday against a ruling that kept him behind bars in New Zealand while US officials seek his extradition for alleged copyright piracy, his lawyers said.

US prosecutors file for extradition of Kim Dotcom

Mar 05, 2012

(AP) -- Federal prosecutors in the United States have filed papers in New Zealand seeking the extradition of Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom and three of his colleagues, whom they accuse of making a fortune by helping Internet ...

Megaupload boss sweats on bail decision: reports

Feb 28, 2012

Megaupload boss Kim Dotcom is set to learn Wednesday if he will remain free on bail in New Zealand while US authorities seek his extradition on online piracy charges, reports said Tuesday.

Recommended for you

Digital dilemma: How will US respond to Sony hack?

Dec 18, 2014

The detective work blaming North Korea for the Sony hacker break-in appears so far to be largely circumstantial, The Associated Press has learned. The dramatic conclusion of a Korean role is based on subtle ...

UN General Assembly OKs digital privacy resolution

Dec 18, 2014

The U.N. General Assembly has approved a resolution demanding better digital privacy protections for people around the world, another response to Edward Snowden's revelations about U.S. government spying.

Online privacy to remain thorny issue: survey

Dec 18, 2014

Online privacy will remain a thorny issue over the next decade, without a widely accepted system that balances user rights and personal data collection, a survey of experts showed Thursday.

Spain: Google News vanishes amid 'Google Tax' spat

Dec 16, 2014

Google on Tuesday followed through with a pledge to shut down Google News in Spain in reaction to a Spanish law requiring news publishers to receive payment for content even if they are willing to give it away.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Cave_Man
5 / 5 (3) Jun 02, 2012
It really was complete bullcrap, instead of following the legal process the US choose to display it's totalitarian power by shutting it down after MILLIONS of people fought to kill SOPA and related bills.

Our beloved country is no longer run by the people for the people but instead ruled with an iron fist by the greedy and for the greedy and super rich.

I would never pay for something that is essentially free to watch on TV, also if file hosting of TV shows is illegal then aren't millions of people breaking the law every day when they use their DVR to record TV and watch it as many times as they want whenever they want.

All I can say is FUCK THE GREEDY BITCHES, they should be forced to live in my shoes for a day where I make $8 an hour doing extremely hard labor in unsafe conditions. That's my america.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.