CEO: Lawuit could kill Internet TV startup

May 31, 2012

(AP) — News Corp.'s Fox and other broadcasters went to court on Wednesday to try to pull the plug on a startup that takes live TV programming and sends it to mobile devices in New York for a monthly fee.

If granted, a preliminary injunction sought by the plaintiffs would devastate Aereo, the company's chief executive told a judge at a hearing in federal court in Manhattan.

Extended litigation "would be the end of the company," Chaitanya Kanojia said.

Kanojia testified that Aereo made no secret of its plan to assign each $12-a-month subscriber one of the tens of thousands of miniature antennas warehoused in Brooklyn. The setup allows users to capture over-the-air broadcasts for viewing on iPhones, iPads and computers.

"I did this the right way," he said. "We were public about what we’re building."

Rather than object before Aereo launched its service this year, the plaintiffs chose "to lie in wait until we exposed ourselves and then sued us," Kanojia said.

The copyright infringement lawsuit brought by Fox, ABC, CBS, NBC and others accuses Aereo of copying and retransmitting their programming over the Internet unlawfully. Aereo has argued that it's providing a legal, alternate platform for free TV broadcasts.

On cross-examination, Kanojia conceded that he and his investors were aware all along that litigation was likely and that he had even set aside funds to defend the company in court. Among the investors is Barry Diller, the former head of Paramount Pictures.

"I think investors fully understood that there was a chance that could happen," he said when asked about the specter of a suit.

The case is being closely watched because of the precedent it could set. Broadcasters owned by The Walt Disney Co., CBS Corp. and Comcast Corp. have deals to collect hundreds of millions of dollars annually from cable and satellite TV providers for the right to retransmit their signals to subscribers.

Such signals are also available using an antenna, but most TV households pay for service through a provider. If Aereo's service is found not to infringe on broadcasters' copyrights, it could upend a system that has created a profitable new revenue stream for media companies.

Last week, U.S. District Court Judge Alison Nathan in New York dismissed a separate claim of unfair competition, saying it was pre-empted by the Copyright Act.

No immediate ruling was expected on the motion for an injunction in the copyright case.

Explore further: Creating the fastest outdoor wireless Internet connection in the world

5 /5 (1 vote)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Aereo wins partial victory in broadcasters' suit

May 22, 2012

(AP) -- Aereo, a startup that takes live TV broadcasts and sends them to mobile devices in New York for a monthly fee, has won a partial victory in court over the media companies that are suing it.

Startup sends live local TV to the iPhone

Feb 17, 2012

(AP) -- A startup backed by media billionaire Barry Diller has launched a service that sends live local TV feeds to iPhones and iPads. But the service may be short-lived, since TV stations are likely to challenge ...

Fox joins broadcasters in blocking Google TV link

Nov 11, 2010

(AP) -- News Corp.'s Fox has joined broadcasters ABC, CBS and NBC in blocking access to full episodes of shows when searched from Google TV's Web browser, according to a person at Fox familiar with the matter.

Recommended for you

Cyclist's helmet, Volvo car to communicate for safety

16 hours ago

Volvo calls it "a life-saving wearable cycling tech concept." The car maker is referring to a connected car and helmet prototype that enables two-way communication between Volvo drivers and cyclists for proximity ...

California puzzles over safety of driverless cars

17 hours ago

California's Department of Motor Vehicles will miss a year-end deadline to adopt new rules for cars of the future because regulators first have to figure out how they'll know whether "driverless" vehicles ...

Britain's UKIP issues online rules after gaffes

17 hours ago

UK Independence Party (UKIP), the British anti-European Union party, has ordered a crackdown on the use of social media by supporters and members following a series of controversies.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Lex Talonis
1 / 5 (2) May 31, 2012
Fox, ABC, CBS, NBC and others?

There is a reason why I have a life and do amazing things.....

"Free to air" is not actually free, they have so much bullshit and so many adds, well the exchange if I choose to participate in the deal, I am getting to watch an hour of dubious content, for an hour of advertising.

If I was earning money with my time, that is like $40 an hour to watch the show, and $40 an hour to watch the adds......

If I am really desperate to see a movie, or documentary, I can watch the subject matter on Youtube (with add blockers running) or I can hire or download the movie for a $1 or two....

But I am not spending $80 worth of my time, to be fed BS about products and services and "reality checks" that I do not need or want.

Some people watch 30 or 40 hours of TV per week.

To me that is 30 or 40 hours of wasted "creative time" that can earn me $40 an hour.

I spend almost NO time watching any TV ever.

I also dislike being fed bullshit by stupid add libbing people.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.