Through hardship to the stars

Jan 04, 2012

"Humanity's adventurous, stubborn, mad and glorious aspiration to reach the stars" is the subject of Physics World's lead feature in January.

Sidney Perkowitz, Candler Professor of Physics Emeritus at Emory University, Atlanta, US, reports from the 100 Year Starship Study (100YSS) conference and discusses the challenges that presents.

With current propulsion technology only able to move spacecraft at 0.005% of the , a one-way trip to the nearest our Sun, Alpha Centauri, would take 80,000 years to travel the four light-years to our nearest stellar neighbours.

Delegates at 100YSS – from ex-astronauts to engineers, artists, students and science-fiction writers – looked at the range of issues facing scientists who would like to make the "mad and glorious " a reality.

Starting with the development of a rocket engine that can reach high velocity, humans are not short of initiative, but, as Perkowitz describes, even with engines based on photon-powered sails or nuclear fusion, we are still a long way from reaching the speed of light.

Some theoretical models present tantalizing options, such as Miguel Alcibierre's idea to contract space–time in front of a spaceship and expand space–time behind it to create a bubble that would propel the at any speed without violating special relativity.

Picking on this example, Perkowitz explains that the maths is impeccable but that the model requires negative mass, which, to the best of our knowledge, doesn't exist.

Accepting that interstellar travel will, at very best, take decades, some are now considering using suspended animation, or even carrying the DNA and other resources necessary to recreate humans on an unmanned ship.

As Perkowitz writes, "With the exploration of the solar system by the US space agency NASA and others well under way, and with the discovery of hundreds of exoplanets orbiting distant stars, it may be time to contemplate the next great jump outwards."

Explore further: SpaceX gets 10-year tax exemption for Texas site

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Light speed

Oct 10, 2011

The recent news of neutrinos moving faster than light might have got everyone thinking about warp drive and all that, but really there is no need to imagine something that can move faster than 300,000 kilometres ...

Five things about NASA's Voyager mission

Apr 27, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Here are five facts about NASA's twin Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft, the longest continuously-operating spacecraft in deep space. The Voyagers were built by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in ...

Mass is energy

Nov 21, 2011

Some say that the reason you can't travel faster than light is that your mass will increase as your speed approaches light speed – so, regardless of how much energy your star drive can generate, you reach ...

A photon’s point of view

Aug 08, 2011

From a photon’s point of view, it is emitted and then instantaneously reabsorbed. This is true for a photon emitted in the core of the Sun, which might be reabsorbed after crossing a fraction of a millimetre’s ...

NASA to test new solar sail technology

Oct 14, 2011

Solar sails, much like anti-matter and ion engines appear at first glance to only exist in science fiction. Many technologies from science fiction however, become science fact.

Speed demon creates a shock

Mar 11, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Just as some drivers obey the speed limit while others treat every road as if it were the Autobahn, some stars move through space faster than others. NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, ...

Recommended for you

SpaceX rocket explodes during test flight

3 hours ago

A SpaceX rocket exploded in midair during a test flight, though no one was injured, as the company seeks to develop a spacecraft that can return to Earth and be used again.

Amazing raw Cassini images from this week

21 hours ago

When Saturn is at its closest to Earth, it's three-quarters of a billion miles away—or more than a billion kilometers! That makes these raw images from the ringed planet all the more remarkable.

Europe launches two navigation satellites

21 hours ago

Two satellites for Europe's rival to GPS were lifted into space on Friday to boost the Galileo constellation to six orbiters of a final 30, the European Space Agency (ESA) said.

SpaceX gets 10-year tax exemption for Texas site

22 hours ago

Cameron County commissioners have agreed to waive 10 years of county taxes as part of an agreement bringing the world's first commercial site for orbital rocket launches to the southernmost tip of Texas.

Voyager map details Neptune's strange moon Triton

Aug 22, 2014

(Phys.org) —NASA's Voyager 2 spacecraft gave humanity its first close-up look at Neptune and its moon Triton in the summer of 1989. Like an old film, Voyager's historic footage of Triton has been "restored" ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

KellyB
3.5 / 5 (4) Jan 04, 2012
One option that is alway overlooked is the sending of non biological people to the stars. Within 100 years the probability is high that we will have the technology to upload a human mind into an artificial substrate. With a life span equal to the life of the hardware, no need for food or oxygen, just power, and the ability to sleep for melenia with no ill side effects, it is the natural choice. Who knows, we may not even have biologic humans left to send in a few hundred years. Biologic bodies will be too prone to failure to consider for even every day life. Immortality anyone...
Xbw
2.3 / 5 (6) Jan 04, 2012
I don't see the point of attempting to get anywhere outside our solar system using "Conventional propultion" since it will never bring us close to the speed of light.

The real key is figuring out how to bend space (warp drive more or less) and move in that manner. I'm not saying we will figure it out any time soon but we should aim a bit higher than rockets.
ScottyB
2.5 / 5 (2) Jan 05, 2012
At what velocity would the VASIMR engine be able to propel a space ship to if it was powered by a nuclear reactor? Not forgetting that it could be on constantly, building up speed.