US joins effort to draw up space 'code of conduct'
This artist's impression released in 2011 by the European Space Agency (ESA) shows the debris field in low-Earth orbit (LEO). The United States pledged on Tuesday to join an EU-led effort to develop a space "code of conduct" that would set out rules for orbiting spacecraft and for mitigating the growing problem of debris.
The United States pledged Tuesday to join an EU-led effort to develop a space "code of conduct" that would set rules for orbiting spacecraft and for mitigating the growing problem of orbiting debris.
"The long-term sustainability of our space environment is at serious risk from space debris and irresponsible actors," said a statement from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
"In response to these challenges, the United States has decided to join with the European Union and other nations to develop an International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities."
Such a code should "help maintain the long-term sustainability, safety, stability and security of space by establishing guidelines for the responsible use of space," Clinton added, noting that work on the code was just beginning.
The proposal was first submitted to the Conference on Disarmament by the European Union in 2009, just days after a disused Russian military satellite and a US communications satellite collided.
A draft code on civilian and military use, which includes pledges on the safety of orbiting space objects, had been previously approved by EU ministers in late 2008.
Countries signing up to the code would pledge to maintain freedom of access and use of outer space "for peaceful purposes without interference, fully respecting the security, safety and integrity of space objects in orbit," according to the text released in Geneva in 2009.
Graphic chronology with illustration of the history of satellites, dating from 1957 to 1999
They also would pledge to cooperate to "prevent harmful interference in outer space activities" and seek to prevent outer space from being an area of conflict even if they were engaged in military activities in space.Clinton said Washington "has made clear to our partners that we will not enter into a code of conduct that in any way constrains our national security-related activities in space or our ability to protect the United States and our allies."
However, she said the United States is "committed to working together to reverse the troubling trends that are damaging our space environment and to preserve the limitless benefits and promise of space for future generations."
The Pentagon said it also supported the concept of a space code of conduct and that the EU draft offered a "promising basis" from which to start.
This file photo shows the Ariane 5 rocket, carrying telecommunication satellites, seconds after take-off from its launch site in Kourou, in the French overseas department of Guiana, in 2011. The United States has pledged to join an EU-led effort to develop a space "code of conduct" that would set rules for orbiting spacecraft and for mitigating the growing problem of orbiting debris.
"An international code of conduct can enhance US national security by encouraging responsible space behavior by reducing the risk of mishaps, misperceptions and mistrust," said Pentagon spokesman George Little.
The US announcement came days after parts of a defunct Russian Mars probe weighing 13.5 tons crashed into the Pacific Ocean after orbiting the Earth for more than two months.
A six-ton NASA satellite launched in 1991 met a similar fate in September last year, plunging into the Pacific Ocean off California.
The US government rejected a previous proposal from Russia and China in 2008 that would have banned the use of weapons in space.
US officials said the proposed treaty was deficient because it did not include a ban on terrestrial weapons that could shoot down satellites.
NASA and the Pentagon claim to be tracking by radar about 19,000 orbiting objects, many of them small pieces of space debris.
The International Space Station must regularly maneuver to avoid colliding with some of the orbiting debris, which could create catastrophic damage.
(c) 2012 AFP
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Distance of planets from stars and revolution
7 hours ago
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
5 hours ago |
3.7 / 5 (3) |
5
|
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
7 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (5) |
15
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
7 hours ago |
4 / 5 (4) |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (15) |
41
Stunning image of smallest possible five-ringed structure
Scientists have created and imaged the smallest possible five-ringed structure about 100,000 times thinner than a human hair and you'll probably recognise its shape.
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Scientists develop ultra-sensitive test that detects diseases in their earliest stages
Scientists have developed an ultra-sensitive test that should enable them to detect signs of a disease in its earliest stages, in research published today in the journal Nature Materials.


Jan 17, 2012
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (4)
Jan 18, 2012
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (10)
2) No one has yet died through (or even been harmed by) space debris
3) There are a lot of objects out there that are not man made which are equaly dangerous. Several tons of that stuff impact the Earth every day
While space debris is a danger we really shouldn't blow this completely out of proportion. Chances that you will win the lottery are much greater than getting hit by some random piece of space debris.
Jan 18, 2012
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (3)
...thanks for the laugh.
Jan 18, 2012
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
The rising population of space debris increases the potential danger to all space vehicles, but especially to the International Space Station, space shuttles and other spacecraft with humans on board."- NASA
I'm impressed that you know more about the subject than NASA.
Jan 18, 2012
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
"If the probability of collision is greater than 1 in 100,000, a maneuver will be conducted if it will not result in significant impact to mission objectives. If it is greater than 1 in 10,000, a maneuver will be conducted unless it will result in additional risk to the crew. "
Given that we have heard it on the news every time the ISS was actually moved (which has been about a handful of times since its construction) the probability of a hit is - despite the many objects out there - very low.
As I said: Space is big. Creation of debris should be avoided but there are other things which are much more pressing. And you can't do anything against meteorite material. That will just continue to be inbound forever.
Jan 18, 2012
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (4)
Your chances of being hit by Space Debris are 1 in 5,000,000,000
Jan 18, 2012
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
"The International Space Station must regularly maneuver to avoid colliding with some of the orbiting debris, which could create catastrophic damage."- from the article above
Jan 18, 2012
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jan 18, 2012
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Now picture Tony Soprano in a spacesuit.
Jan 18, 2012
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (8)
Oh boy. Do you even have an idea how large space is? Do you have any idea how to collect this stuff that is floating around at terrific speeds? Most notably: How to collect it without creating additional shrapnel on impact?
Or how much gigatonnes of fuel it would take to maneuver to just a few locations to grab the occasional fleck of paint?
Sometimes I just despair at how limited the human mind is when it comes to things bigger than a house or how little people understand the effort to put something into space - let alone maneuver there.
The sheer volume and the orders of magnitude involved are so much beyond people on this site it makes me want to cry...
Jan 18, 2012
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Also, the speeds we are talking about are relative to other objects. If you are in the same orbit and altitude, your relative closing speed can be brought down to a managable level. It is when you have crossing orbits at nearly 90 degrees to each other - boom!, just like to collision between the US and USSR satellites. I'm afraid we don't yet have the technology to catch flects of paint, or nuts and bolts, but we can capture and/or de-orbit the booster stages, defunct satellites, and the larger stuff before they collide with each other, preventing the creation of many smaller pieces. And, perhaps we can convince others (e.g. China, US) not to shoot down any more satellites to demonstrate their "manhood". The human mind is only as limited as you allow it to be.
Jan 18, 2012
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
http://www.au.af....at20.pdf
Jan 18, 2012
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Jan 19, 2012
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
ANTARIKSHASYA SHANTIH- PRIDHVEEM SHANTIH
Peace must prevail on Earth Region and Space holds the Key
Create :Necessity-Demand-Curiosity-Sustain the spirit of Co-existence
Human being Environment and Space must define
Objectivity-Business-Administration-Management- Association-
Vidyardhi nanduri [Cosmology World Peace]
Jan 22, 2012
Rank: not rated yet
What, are humans magnetic? The ISS isn't at GREATER risk of damage because people are there. So yeah, NASA isn't the most rational.
Jan 23, 2012
Rank: not rated yet
Maybe they also mean that the ISS is in low orbit whereas many sattelites are not. There's more debris in lower orbit than in higher orbits.