Experts urge 18th-century 'Irish giant' be laid to rest

December 21, 2011

Experts called Wednesday for the skeleton of Charles Byrne, the "Irish giant", to be removed from a London museum where it has been on display for almost 200 years and buried at sea, as he wanted.

Standing at seven feet seven inches tall (2.3 metres), Byrne was a celebrity in his own lifetime and when he died in 1783 at the age of 22, the renowned surgeon and anatomist John Hunter was keen to acquire his skeleton.

According to the British Medical Journal (BMJ), Byrne was terrified of becoming one of Hunter's specimens and wanted to be buried at sea.

But the surgeon managed to bribe one of the Irishman's friends and took his body before it could be laid to rest in the English Channel.

Hunter boiled Byrne's body down to a skeleton and it became a key feature of his anatomy collection. This was later displayed at the Hunterian Museum at the Royal College of Surgeons in London, where it remains today.

In the BMJ article, experts acknowledge the role the skeleton has played in research, including by helping to link acromegaly -- an unusual condition where someone produces too much growth hormone -- and the pituitary gland.

But Len Doyal, emeritus professor of medical ethics at Queen Mary university in London, and Thomas Muinzer, a lawyer at Queen's University Belfast, say it is now time to grant Byrne's wish and give him a peaceful burial at sea.

"The fact is that Hunter knew of Byrne's terror of him and ignored his wishes for the disposal of his body. What has been done cannot be undone but it can be morally rectified," they wrote.

"Surely it is time to respect the memory and reputation of Byrne: the narrative of his life, including the circumstances surrounding his death."

They argue that Byrne's DNA has now been taken and can be used in further research, while his skeleton can be replaced by a fake for the purposes of public education.

"As a sign of respect for Byrne's original desires, his skeleton should be buried at sea as part of a ceremony commemorating his life," they write.

However, Hunterian Museum director Sam Alberti rejected the call, saying the value of the remains outweighed his apparent wishes.

"A vivid example of the value of having access to the skeleton is the current research into familial isolated pituitary adenoma (benign pituitary tumours that run in families)," he said.

"This genetically links Byrne to living communities, including individuals who have requested that the skeleton should remain on display in the museum.

"At the present time, the museum's trustees consider that the educational and research benefits merit retaining the remains."

(c) 2011 AFP

4.8 /5 (4 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

ubavontuba
Dec 21, 2011

Rank: 2.7 / 5 (7)
Morally reprehensible. Let him go.
Squirrel
Dec 21, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
The problem is what he wanted did not happen and cannot be reversed--he has been made a specimen--putting his remains back in the sea cannot reverse that abuse. It is likely his wishes concerned the process of becoming a specimen more than what happened afterwards. That is a problem since we do not know what he would have wished if having become one of Hunter's specimens, he then became because of that an individual with a legacy of fame--a legacy of fame that now might be reduced if his original wish is now carried out. Look at Charles Byrne (giant) on Wikepdia--he has more enduring fame than most Irishman of his era--it is not clear if he had foreseen that he would have objected to that fame continuing.
rawa1
Dec 21, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
We shouldn't use him as a public attraction in museum, but we shouldn't destroy this rare genetic evidence of gigantism as well. Maybe it holds the clue about our real origin, which many evolutionists would prefer to cover before publicity.

http://upload.wik...tion.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-WU42jDMvu4w/TZOQSBsLDdI/AAAAAAAAFII/CPHgTkRguSU/s1600/Giant Skulls.jpg

http://wmmagazin....09030148
rawa1
Dec 21, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
For example, here you can read about many interesting artifacts, which the mainstream science ignores for years in the same way, like the cold fusion finding. We are living in very obscurantist times and it must simply stop.

http://nexusillum...ive.html
KingDWS
Dec 21, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Morally reprehensible. Let him go.

Reprehensible and then some. The man clearly stated his wishes and his concern for exactly this happening. After 200 years and the body being boiled to reduce it to bones I'd question the viability of any genetic materials value. Shaking my head at this.
Rank 4.8 /5 (4 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils

created 7 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (4) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say

(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor – while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives – may do more harm ...

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4 / 5 (21) | comments 155

Ancient Bethlehem seal unearthed in Jerusalem

Israeli archaeologists have discovered a 2,700-year-old seal that bears the inscription "Bethlehem," the Israel Antiquities Authority announced Wednesday, in what experts believe to be the oldest artifact ...

Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 3.3 / 5 (15) | comments 24

Dollars and sense: Why are some people morally against tax?

As the U.S. presidential election campaigns heat up, the economic debate is dominated by bailouts, austerity and, inevitably, taxation. Now a new study published in Symbolic Interaction asks why tax is such an important issue ...

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 2.3 / 5 (3) | comments 19

Oldest Jewish archaeological evidence on the Iberian Peninsula

German archaeologists of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena found one of the oldest archaeological evidence so far of Jewish Culture on the Iberian Peninsula at an excavation site in the south of Portugal, ...

Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.2 / 5 (6) | comments 12


Stunning image of smallest possible five-ringed structure

Scientists have created and imaged the smallest possible five-ringed structure – about 100,000 times thinner than a human hair – and you'll probably recognise its shape.

'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study

(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.

Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy

Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...