Court OKs immunity for telecoms in wiretap case

Dec 30, 2011 By JASON DEAREN , Associated Press

A federal appeals court has ruled as constitutional a law giving telecommunications companies legal immunity for helping the government with its email and telephone eavesdropping program.

Thursday's unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit affirmed a lower regarding the 2008 law.

The appeal concerned a case that consolidated 33 different lawsuits filed against various telecom companies, including AT&T, Sprint Nextel, Verizon Communications Inc. and BellSouth Corp. on behalf of these companies' customers.

The noted comments made by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding the legal immunity's role in helping the government gather intelligence.

"It emphasized that electronic intelligence gathering depends in great part on cooperation from private companies ... and that if litigation were allowed to proceed against persons allegedly assisting in such activities, `the private sector might be unwilling to cooperate with lawful government requests in the future,'" Judge M. Margaret McKeown said.

The plaintiffs, represented by lawyers including the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union, accuse the companies of violating the law and the privacy of its customers through collaboration with National Security Agency on intelligence gathering.

The case stemmed from new surveillance rules passed by Congress in 2008 that included protection from legal liability for that allegedly helped the U.S. spy on Americans without warrants.

"I'm very disappointed. I think the court reaches to try to put lipstick on a pig here," said Cindy Cohn, legal director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, who argued the case before the panel. "I think what Congress did was an abdication of its duty to protect people from illegal surveillance."

Thursday did not bring all bad news for plaintiffs challenging the government's surveillance efforts.

In a separate opinion on Thursday, a three-judge panel of the court revived two other lawsuits that seek redress for telecom customers whose information may have been compromised by the warrantless surveillance program.

Two groups of telecom customers sued the NSA for violating their privacy by collecting Internet data from AT&T and other major in the surveillance program authorized by President George W. Bush.

Government lawyers have moved to stop such cases, arguing that defending the program in court would jeopardize national security and expose state secrets.

The suits will be sent back to U.S. District Court in San Francisco.

Emails seeking comment from AT&T and the U.S. Department of Justice weren't immediately returned.

Explore further: Scientists twist radio beams to send data: Transmissions reach speeds of 32 gigabits per second

5 /5 (6 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US appeals court considers wiretapping lawsuits

Aug 31, 2011

(AP) -- A federal appeals court panel in Seattle will consider Wednesday whether to revive two cases claiming the government has monitored the communications of millions of Americans since 9/11.

Federal judge tosses warrantless wiretap cases

Jun 03, 2009

(AP) -- A federal judge on Wednesday tossed out more than three dozen lawsuits filed against the nation's telecommunications companies for allegedly taking part in the government's e-mail and telephone eavesdropping program ...

Court won't stop hormone replacement lawsuits

Oct 12, 2010

(AP) -- The Supreme Court won't reconsider a decision to reinstate more than 100 lawsuits filed by women who claimed that hormone replacement therapy caused breast cancer.

AT&T claims ownership of customer data

Jun 22, 2006

AT&T has been charged with violating the privacy of its customers by handing over data to the National Security Agency, a charge that it has hitherto denied.

AT&T's NSA legal woes continue to grow

May 23, 2006

AT&T has flatly denied the allegations, but the telecommunications giant continues to be mired by reports that it and other major carriers have gone out of their way to cooperate with the U.S. government to ...

Recommended for you

Oculus unveils new prototype VR headset

10 hours ago

Oculus has unveiled a new prototype of its virtual reality headset. However, the VR company still isn't ready to release a consumer edition.

Wireless sensor transmits tumor pressure

16 hours ago

The interstitial pressure inside a tumor is often remarkably high compared to normal tissues and is thought to impede the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents as well as decrease the effectiveness of radiation ...

Tim Cook puts personal touch on iPhone 6 launch

17 hours ago

Apple chief Tim Cook personally kicked off sales of the iPhone 6, joining in "selfies" and shaking hands with customers Friday outside the company's store near his Silicon Valley home.

Team improves solar-cell efficiency

Sep 19, 2014

New light has been shed on solar power generation using devices made with polymers, thanks to a collaboration between scientists in the University of Chicago's chemistry department, the Institute for Molecular ...

Calif. teachers fund to boost clean energy bets

Sep 19, 2014

The California State Teachers' Retirement System says it plans to increase its investments in clean energy and technology to $3.7 billion, from $1.4 billion, over the next five years.

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shifty0x88
4 / 5 (4) Dec 30, 2011
I agree that cellphone companies should not be legally liable for authorized wire tapping on private citizens but if they are doing it just because they are asked to, without a warrant I DO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT! and they should be HELD LEGALLY LIABLE!
NeutronicallyRepulsive
4 / 5 (4) Dec 30, 2011
Flipping egg, what are you building over there in the US? 1984 Oceania?
Blaspheyou
3 / 5 (2) Dec 30, 2011
What Shifty said.
Jeddy_Mctedder
1.5 / 5 (6) Dec 30, 2011
it all started with marbury versus madison: courts approve of their own power to approve of other institutions thereby strengthening not only their own institutional imperitave but the imperative of any other institutions that they side with.

Argiod
1.8 / 5 (5) Dec 30, 2011
Privacy? What privacy? Any hacker worth his bits can now access our government's files... what makes us think there's anything resembling privacy in today's world?

"You'd better watch out, you'd better not shout; Uncle Sam's coming to town...."
_nigmatic10
2.3 / 5 (3) Dec 30, 2011
Privacy begins and ends with the power button. Learn it well.
hagger
3 / 5 (1) Dec 31, 2011
bought off...and since when did any government do any thing lawfull..esp the US government..corrupt to the core all governments..i have no respect for them what so ever...self serving megalomaniacs...