Court OKs immunity for telecoms in wiretap case

Dec 30, 2011 By JASON DEAREN , Associated Press

A federal appeals court has ruled as constitutional a law giving telecommunications companies legal immunity for helping the government with its email and telephone eavesdropping program.

Thursday's unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit affirmed a lower regarding the 2008 law.

The appeal concerned a case that consolidated 33 different lawsuits filed against various telecom companies, including AT&T, Sprint Nextel, Verizon Communications Inc. and BellSouth Corp. on behalf of these companies' customers.

The noted comments made by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding the legal immunity's role in helping the government gather intelligence.

"It emphasized that electronic intelligence gathering depends in great part on cooperation from private companies ... and that if litigation were allowed to proceed against persons allegedly assisting in such activities, `the private sector might be unwilling to cooperate with lawful government requests in the future,'" Judge M. Margaret McKeown said.

The plaintiffs, represented by lawyers including the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union, accuse the companies of violating the law and the privacy of its customers through collaboration with National Security Agency on intelligence gathering.

The case stemmed from new surveillance rules passed by Congress in 2008 that included protection from legal liability for that allegedly helped the U.S. spy on Americans without warrants.

"I'm very disappointed. I think the court reaches to try to put lipstick on a pig here," said Cindy Cohn, legal director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, who argued the case before the panel. "I think what Congress did was an abdication of its duty to protect people from illegal surveillance."

Thursday did not bring all bad news for plaintiffs challenging the government's surveillance efforts.

In a separate opinion on Thursday, a three-judge panel of the court revived two other lawsuits that seek redress for telecom customers whose information may have been compromised by the warrantless surveillance program.

Two groups of telecom customers sued the NSA for violating their privacy by collecting Internet data from AT&T and other major in the surveillance program authorized by President George W. Bush.

Government lawyers have moved to stop such cases, arguing that defending the program in court would jeopardize national security and expose state secrets.

The suits will be sent back to U.S. District Court in San Francisco.

Emails seeking comment from AT&T and the U.S. Department of Justice weren't immediately returned.

Explore further: Making smartphone browsing 20% faster while reducing power consumption by 40%

5 /5 (6 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US appeals court considers wiretapping lawsuits

Aug 31, 2011

(AP) -- A federal appeals court panel in Seattle will consider Wednesday whether to revive two cases claiming the government has monitored the communications of millions of Americans since 9/11.

Federal judge tosses warrantless wiretap cases

Jun 03, 2009

(AP) -- A federal judge on Wednesday tossed out more than three dozen lawsuits filed against the nation's telecommunications companies for allegedly taking part in the government's e-mail and telephone eavesdropping program ...

Court won't stop hormone replacement lawsuits

Oct 12, 2010

(AP) -- The Supreme Court won't reconsider a decision to reinstate more than 100 lawsuits filed by women who claimed that hormone replacement therapy caused breast cancer.

AT&T claims ownership of customer data

Jun 22, 2006

AT&T has been charged with violating the privacy of its customers by handing over data to the National Security Agency, a charge that it has hitherto denied.

AT&T's NSA legal woes continue to grow

May 23, 2006

AT&T has flatly denied the allegations, but the telecommunications giant continues to be mired by reports that it and other major carriers have gone out of their way to cooperate with the U.S. government to ...

Recommended for you

Microsoft beefs up security protection in Windows 10

16 hours ago

What Microsoft users in business care deeply about—-a system architecture that supports efforts to get their work done efficiently; a work-centric menu to quickly access projects rather than weather readings ...

US official: Auto safety agency under review

Oct 24, 2014

Transportation officials are reviewing the "safety culture" of the U.S. agency that oversees auto recalls, a senior Obama administration official said Friday. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has been criticized ...

Out-of-patience investors sell off Amazon

Oct 24, 2014

Amazon has long acted like an ideal customer on its own website: a freewheeling big spender with no worries about balancing a checkbook. Investors confident in founder and CEO Jeff Bezos' invest-and-expand ...

Ebola.com domain sold for big payout

Oct 24, 2014

The owners of the website Ebola.com have scored a big payday with the outbreak of the epidemic, selling the domain for more than $200,000 in cash and stock.

Hacker gets prison for cyberattack stealing $9.4M

Oct 24, 2014

An Estonian man who pleaded guilty to orchestrating a 2008 cyberattack on a credit card processing company that enabled hackers to steal $9.4 million has been sentenced to 11 years in prison by a federal judge in Atlanta.

Magic Leap moves beyond older lines of VR

Oct 24, 2014

Two messages from Magic Leap: Most of us know that a world with dragons and unicorns, elves and fairies is just a better world. The other message: Technology can be mindboggingly awesome. When the two ...

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shifty0x88
4 / 5 (4) Dec 30, 2011
I agree that cellphone companies should not be legally liable for authorized wire tapping on private citizens but if they are doing it just because they are asked to, without a warrant I DO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT! and they should be HELD LEGALLY LIABLE!
NeutronicallyRepulsive
4 / 5 (4) Dec 30, 2011
Flipping egg, what are you building over there in the US? 1984 Oceania?
Blaspheyou
3 / 5 (2) Dec 30, 2011
What Shifty said.
Jeddy_Mctedder
1.5 / 5 (6) Dec 30, 2011
it all started with marbury versus madison: courts approve of their own power to approve of other institutions thereby strengthening not only their own institutional imperitave but the imperative of any other institutions that they side with.

Argiod
1.8 / 5 (5) Dec 30, 2011
Privacy? What privacy? Any hacker worth his bits can now access our government's files... what makes us think there's anything resembling privacy in today's world?

"You'd better watch out, you'd better not shout; Uncle Sam's coming to town...."
_nigmatic10
2.3 / 5 (3) Dec 30, 2011
Privacy begins and ends with the power button. Learn it well.
hagger
3 / 5 (1) Dec 31, 2011
bought off...and since when did any government do any thing lawfull..esp the US government..corrupt to the core all governments..i have no respect for them what so ever...self serving megalomaniacs...