Wolf hunting strategy follows simple rules

Oct 28, 2011 by Lin Edwards report
Mollies Pack Wolves Baiting a Bison. Image: Wikipedia.

(PhysOrg.com) -- A new study of wolves (Canis lupus) has found that communication between pack members and a social hierarchy are not essential features of a successful hunt, and all the wolves have to do is follow two simple rules.

The researchers, led by Cristina Muro of the Assistance Dogs Association AEPA-Euskadi, in Bilbao, Spain and colleagues in Spain and the US, used computational simulations to study the strategies of wolf packs in hunting and capturing .

The results of the study were that two simple rules were sufficient to reproduce the actual wolf-pack behaviour of tracking, pursuing and encircling prey seen in the wild. The rules were, firstly, move towards the prey until at a close but safe distance (the distance depending on factors such as the length of horns), and then secondly, when at the minimum safe distance, to move away from the other wolves which are also in position.

The only information each of the five wolves in the computer-simulated pack needed was the position of the other wolves in the pack, and it did not necessarily need to communicate with the other members. The computer models also found that no hierarchy was required within the pack for the hunting to be successful.

The results suggest that theories requiring the wolves to display a strict hierarchy along with superior intelligence and ability to plan the chase may be off the mark, since simply following the two rules resulted in the virtual wolves in the computer simulation behaving remarkably like wild wolf packs. The virtual wolves closed in and encircled the prey in the same way as real wolves, and if the prey tried to escape one wolf would sometimes seem to ambush the prey after it drew back to maintain distance from the other members of the pack, which placed it in the path of the prey animal.

The results of the study do not prove, however, that wolves are not intelligent and do not show foresight or planning.

Research at Yellowstone Park reported on last month at Physorg also demonstrated that wolves are risk-averse and keep at a safe distance if they can, leaving other members of the pack to do the dangerous work of getting in closer to prey, which can kick or gore them to death. This research also showed that smaller can hunt more effectively than larger packs.

The results of the two studies raise questions about why tend to live in packs, since the previously held assumptions of a large pack being more effective at hunting, and social behaviour and communication being essential, appear to be wrong.

Explore further: Male monkey filmed caring for dying mate (w/ Video)

More information: Wolf-pack (Canis lupus) hunting strategies emerge from simple rules in computational simulations, Behavioural Processes,
Volume 88, Issue 3, November 2011, Pages 192-197. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2011.09.006

Abstract
We have produced computational simulations of multi-agent systems in which wolf agents chase prey agents. We show that two simple decentralized rules controlling the movement of each wolf are enough to reproduce the main features of the wolf-pack hunting behavior: tracking the prey, carrying out the pursuit, and encircling the prey until it stops moving. The rules are (1) move towards the prey until a minimum safe distance to the prey is reached, and (2) when close enough to the prey, move away from the other wolves that are close to the safe distance to the prey. The hunting agents are autonomous, interchangeable and indistinguishable; the only information each agent needs is the position of the other agents. Our results suggest that wolf-pack hunting is an emergent collective behavior which does not necessarily rely on the presence of effective communication between the individuals participating in the hunt, and that no hierarchy is needed in the group to achieve the task properly.

via Newscientist

Related Stories

Many in West fear wolf reintroduction

Dec 27, 2005

Some 900 wolves roam Idaho, Oregon, Montana, Wyoming and Colorado thanks to a federal program that reintroduced and protected the wolf in the West.

Who's afraid of the big, bad wolf? Coyotes

Sep 11, 2007

While the wily coyote reigns as top dog in much of the country, it leads a nervous existence wherever it coexists with its larger relative, the wolf, according to a new study from the Wildlife Conservation ...

Recommended for you

Male monkey filmed caring for dying mate (w/ Video)

Apr 18, 2014

(Phys.org) —The incident was captured by Dr Bruna Bezerra and colleagues in the Atlantic Forest in the Northeast of Brazil.  Dr Bezerra is a Research Associate at the University of Bristol and a Professor ...

Orchid named after UC Riverside researcher

Apr 17, 2014

One day about eight years ago, Katia Silvera, a postdoctoral scholar at the University of California, Riverside, and her father were on a field trip in a mountainous area in central Panama when they stumbled ...

In sex-reversed cave insects, females have the penises

Apr 17, 2014

Researchers reporting in the Cell Press journal Current Biology on April 17 have discovered little-known cave insects with rather novel sex lives. The Brazilian insects, which represent four distinct but re ...

Fear of the cuckoo mafia

Apr 17, 2014

If a restaurant owner fails to pay the protection money demanded of him, he can expect his premises to be trashed. Warnings like these are seldom required, however, as fear of the consequences is enough to ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

DavidMcC
5 / 5 (3) Oct 28, 2011
"The results of the two studies raise questions about why wolves tend to live in packs, since the previously held assumptions of a large pack being more effective at hunting, and social behaviour and communication being essential, appear to be wrong."

The pack may not need to be very large, but there still needs to be a pack. One wolf can't surround the prey by itself. It's as simple as that!

antialias_physorg
4.2 / 5 (5) Oct 28, 2011
The pack may not need to be very large

Pack size shouldn't be the determining factor. Expected gain per wolf (i.e. amount of food per wolf per unit of time) should be the determining factor.

Increased pack size will increase the chance of a successfull hunt while decreased pack size will increase the amount of food per wolf per kill. This in turn needs to be balanced with availability of prey animals.

I.e. if prey animals are sparse then we have the competing factors of
1) Success per hunt is important (which favors a large pack)
2) Number of hunts is low (which favors a small pack).

Optimum in this 'scarcity' case may be either a large pack or a lone wolf.

If prey animals are plentiful then - even though a smaller number of wolves can amass enough food with only a moderate amount of efficiency - a more successfull pack can sustain larger numbers.
jsdarkdestruction
1 / 5 (1) Oct 28, 2011
yeah, its pretty obvious....how could the author of the study miss that?its obvious working in a group/pack makes it easier to run down and surround and catch prey. also where was it shown a large pack was less effective? social interaction and communication might not be as important as we thought but that in no way proves a large hunting group is less effective than a small one.
jsdarkdestruction
1 / 5 (1) Oct 28, 2011
The pack may not need to be very large

Pack size shouldn't be the determining factor. Expected gain per wolf (i.e. amount of food per wolf per unit of time) should be the determining factor.

Increased pack size will increase the chance of a successfull hunt while decreased pack size will increase the amount of food per wolf per kill. This in turn needs to be balanced with availability of prey animals.

I.e. if prey animals are sparse then we have the competing factors of
1) Success per hunt is important (which favors a large pack)
2) Number of hunts is low (which favors a small pack).

Optimum in this 'scarcity' case may be either a large pack or a lone wolf.

If prey animals are plentiful then - even though a smaller number of wolves can amass enough food with only a moderate amount of efficiency - a more successfull pack can sustain larger numbers.

very well said. i was going to touch on the ideal number depending on the situation but im lazy.
Jeddy_Mctedder
1 / 5 (3) Oct 28, 2011
no doubt our military is too damn stupid to be looking at research like this and extracting obvious strategies of behavior for programming drones.

theyre also too damn stupid to correct their own mal investment into dozens of multibillion dollar failures like the fa22 and to spend effort refocussing on the most important military weapon, the patriotic liberty loving disciplined and dutiful american. instead you get a military hopped on techno crack rife with fraud and infiltrated by gang members and fatsoes
jsdarkdestruction
3 / 5 (2) Oct 29, 2011
nice rant about the military, how precisely would this help drone attacka though? ya know what? dont bother answering that.

More news stories

Researchers successfully clone adult human stem cells

(Phys.org) —An international team of researchers, led by Robert Lanza, of Advanced Cell Technology, has announced that they have performed the first successful cloning of adult human skin cells into stem ...

Plants with dormant seeds give rise to more species

Seeds that sprout as soon as they're planted may be good news for a garden. But wild plants need to be more careful. In the wild, a plant whose seeds sprouted at the first warm spell or rainy day would risk disaster. More ...

Airbnb rental site raises $450 mn

Online lodging listings website Airbnb inked a $450 million funding deal with investors led by TPG, a source close to the matter said Friday.

Health care site flagged in Heartbleed review

People with accounts on the enrollment website for President Barack Obama's signature health care law are being told to change their passwords following an administration-wide review of the government's vulnerability to the ...