DARPA looking to master propaganda via 'Narrative Networks'
October 20, 2011 by Bob Yirka
(PhysOrg.com) -- Sometimes you just dont know whether to laugh, cry or be alarmed when hearing about what the boys in secretive back rooms are doing in the name of antiterrorism, or homeland security, or whatever else they wish to call it. This time it seems, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the semi-secret agency charged with coming up with new and cool ways to protect the citizens of the United States from foreign bad guys, wants to hire someone to figure out how vulnerable some people are to narratives (oral stories, speeches, propaganda, books, etc. that cause people to think) and then, supplant such messages with better messages to head off the path that for such people might lead them to becoming a terrorist.
Called the Narrative Networks project, DARPA has released a solicitation for research proposals by those that have both the know-how and the technology to implement such a program, which is divided into two parts. The first part would involve analyzing what happens to people when they hear or see a message. Its thought that certain messages or images actually cause a change in the brain to accommodate the new ideas.
The second part of the study, quite naturally, would involve developing a means for taking advantage of what is learned in the first part. Or, in other words, to come up with a way to find out who is vulnerable to messaging, and then to blast them with a message that would overwrite any undesirable brain changes that occurred as the result of that person being subjected to bad messages, so that they would behave themselves.
At first blush, such a program would appear to be scary as all get out; after all, if our government gets its hands on technology that could reprogram people who have come to feel things the government doesnt like, it seems like a really good way to control them, including its own population. On second thought though, as reality starts to kick in, it appears that while some research in this area might bear some fruit, its highly doubtful that any such program would meet with much success. After all, governments (and other entities) have been trying to figure out how to brainwash people for thousands of years with very little to show for their efforts.
On the other hand, the folks at DARPA seem to think that new advances in technology might have changed the game a little bit. New types of brain scans can, for example, can actually show a brain being changed due to a received message. And new highly sophisticated electronic sensing devices are able to pick up even the slightest nuances in facial expressions. If the two technologies could be brought together, the thinking goes, perhaps people could be scanned without their knowledge and found to be either vulnerable to messaging or already changed in some way by messaging from a suspect source. In such case, they could be targeted for specialized messaging that has been shown through research to be effective in overriding what has occurred in their unknowing noggins.
Each phase is supposed to go for 18 months though there doesnt appear to be any component of the project that calls for publicly publishing results found or describing product deliveries after completion.
© 2011 PhysOrg.com
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
3 comments
-
Ideas to mitigate risk of 911 calls being misdirected
May 24, 2012
-
Live scribe pen?
May 10, 2012
-
Shallow water flow simulation
May 07, 2012
-
Tablet for taking notes?
May 05, 2012
-
Best fit tablet for me?
May 05, 2012
-
Measure of Informaton
May 04, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Computing & Technology
More news stories
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
8 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
3
Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study
Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
3.6 / 5 (22) |
56
|
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world
(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the companys ultimate vision, successfully producing ...
Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22
Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (12) |
18
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
Same gene that stunts infants' growth also makes them grow too big: research
UCLA geneticists have identified the mutation responsible for IMAGe* syndrome, a rare disorder that stunts infants' growth. The twist? The mutation occurs on the same gene that causes Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, which makes ...
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
All that said, a neat form of brainwashing *is still brainwashing*. I find it hard to believe that the people working on this are dumb enough to think that it would be misused almost immediately upon creation.
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (7)
When I was 20 years old and read the book, I honestly didn't think stuff like that would happen in my lifetime ... now, I'm 45 years old and much of it already has. And they even have the audacity to advertise it.
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
WRONG - It got a totally unqualified community organizer elected as president of the (at the time) most powerful country in the world.
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
someone is gonna get fired for this project.
everytime darpa gets away from hard engineering or sometimes even pure science, they waste money and get in trouble.
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (8)
Where is this going? Economics, physics, chemistry, and statistics, all require this math as a base. The other hard and soft sciences have all reached the point where they can't be understood absent the other sciences.
Without math the individual is left to choose whichever narrative they will believe. Often this choice is made based on a pretty irrational basis. In a sane world, who would care about the economic beliefs of movie stars or fashion models? The math is there. Anyone who wants to can work through the math and verify most of modern economics. If you can't, then what you are taught in church, or temple, or mosque must be true, right?
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I think this statement qualifies as propaganda itself. The first goal is to try to convince people they are not being propagandized.
Propaganda achieved its goal in WWI & WWII in convincing the American public that all Germans were evil and deserved death. And now it convinces the public that Israel is not evil despite using the same methods against their neighbors that Germany did.
Propaganda rules.
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
When reading anything the inconsistencies and contradictions nullify the contents to the point of meaninglessness.
So the meaninglessness is stored in 'back-burner' 'mode'.
So what purpose is there to store (remember) gibberish?
It is what led to the nonsense that is valuable.
The 'thinking'(analytic)that uncovers the flaws to the specific nonsense is of value - for all further information - past, present and future.
The gibberish is simply a reference feature to recognize similar gibberish so you don't waste time applying a different analytic to uncover the same inconsistencies and contradictions.
Barring physical damage to the brain it's 'all' there.
The methods to access 'all' ,to put it mildly, have been pathetic. Not even wrong.
Hire me.
Not.
You don't want everyone recalling everything - just a select few. I have a problem with that.
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Oct 21, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Absolutely. I don't know where you are from but, in my country we had a tax reform early this year. It never ceases to amaze me how people can't do the simple arithmetics. What the government did was to transfer part of tax burden from the earning part of it (income tax) to spending (VAT/GST or whatever name is used in your country).
They were VERY careful to make sure the change is not only [almost] neutral but, in fact, slightly in favor of the tax payer. Not by much but some.
This can be proven with a calculator and some basic maths. Yet, both myself and the few people who can count are fighting a losing rear-guard action against those who can't balance their own cheque books and think they were ripped off.
Oct 21, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Oct 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Oct 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
lol
Oct 22, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (4)
This is one of the most egregiously ignorant and dangerous statements I have ever read on an otherwise respectable site.
I am curious, how can the author, Bob Yirka, make such a profoundly false statement? One with even the most elementary knowledge of history and knows the opposite to be true.
If governments (and other entities) weren't successful at brainwashing how do wars get started? How can populations of different regimes have such radically different perspectives? Hell, how would lay people have such strong opinions regarding AGW?
This author, Bob Yirka, is either incredibly ignorant or is himself an active part of the very propaganda he writes of.
Oct 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Oct 22, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Oct 23, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Of course, you're supposed to think that... *evil laugh*
Oct 23, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Oct 23, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
--------
People, people, people. When I became re-interested in learning science, physics and math a few years ago, which admitedly I have large, but rapidly filling gaps in my understandings, I started to notice that in almost all cases in public forums, whenever anything approaching science comes up for discussion, you can learn proper science by reading the laypeople statements ( which are sometimes not even wrong ), looking up the correct information, which in most cases is the opposite of what is usually bantied around. Incredible ! I've learned a great deal by this method. I honestly am in awe at some of the things people believe. This is frighteneing how easily sophisms and syllogistic fallacies are used to deceive people.
Wait a minute...my lower chakras are starting to tingle....the rupture...it's happening....my frequency is being raised....
..oh no, sorry..my ass fell asleep from sitting too long.
Oct 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
So, if Vonnegut wrote a book about it 50 years ago, who's to say it isn't already happening on some level, right now?
Oct 23, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Here is the kicker. The only way to permanently alter thought is by continual manipulation, or/, by destroying the neurons permanently which leaves all thoughts impossible other than those allowed (programmed).
If the continual signal is lost, regular logical deduction ensues. The brain resets to normal.
This study is worthless unless their plan is to create permanently disabled brains.
It is easy to temporarily affect thinking but given time a person is able to reason back to reality.
What I'm saying is this: this study is either a waste of taxpayers money, or, it is the most evil plan for population control ever conceived. This is straight out of a madscientists handbook
Oct 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Just ranting here, but damn, you can't just say it's "a simple matter of changing energy paths".
Oct 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Any human being that takes an anti-socialistic political stance is a mentally sick individual.
Oct 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
It is easy to affect a persons thoughts. Admittedly, it is difficult to generate a preconceived thought within that individual. Nothing a few nights of study can't discover though.
Oct 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
"I did." -
Bradley Manning
Oct 24, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
In short, being good at math is useless without a critical evaluation of the context of the mathematical outcome.
Oct 24, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
@Gammakozy, would you like some sugar with your tea? :-)
Oct 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Just take a couple billion people living in awful conditions, poor, uneducated and unlikely to ever be anything more. Next, begin spreading the rumor that all of your problems are really the fault of the Great Satan. Let's say the USA for short. And explain that Allah is certain to expect you to kill as many of these people as possible in order to make it all better.
Works like a charm.
Oct 24, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Works like a charm."
-Fixed.