Assange: Financial blockade may close WikiLeaks (Update)

Oct 24, 2011 By RAPHAEL G. SATTER , Associated Press
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange talks to members of the media during a news conference in London, Monday, Oct. 24, 2011. Assange said Monday that financial problems may lead to the closure of the notorious secret-spilling site at the end of this year. (AP Photo/Lefteris Pitarakis)

(AP) -- WikiLeaks - whose spectacular publication of classified data shook world capitals and exposed the inner workings of international diplomacy - may be weeks away from collapse, the organization's leader warned Monday.

Although its attention-grabbing leaks spread outrage and embarrassment across military and diplomatic circles, WikiLeaks' inability to overturn the block on donations imposed by American financial companies may prove its undoing.

"If WikiLeaks does not find a way to remove this blockade we will simply not be able to continue by the turn of the new year," founder told journalists at London's Frontline Club. "If we don't knock down the blockade we simply will not be able to continue."

As an emergency measure, Assange said his group would cease what he called "publication operations" to focus its energy on fundraising. He added that WikiLeaks - which he said had about 20 employees - needs an additional $3.5 million to keep it going into 2013.

WikiLeaks, launched as an online repository for confidential information, shot to notoriety with the April 2010 disclosure of footage of two Reuters journalists killed by a U.S. military strike in Baghdad.

The Pentagon had claimed that the journalists were likely "intermixed among the insurgents," but the helicopter footage, which captured U.S. airmen firing on prone figures and joking about "dead bastards," unsettled many across the world.

The video was just a foretaste. In the following months, WikiLeaks published nearly half a million secret from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. As a whole the documents provided an unprecedented level of detail into the grueling, bloody conflicts. Individually, many raised concerns about the actions of the U.S. and its local allies - for example by detailing evidence of abuse, torture and worse by Iraqi security forces.

Although U.S. officials railed against the disclosures, claiming that they were putting lives at risk, it wasn't until WikiLeaks began publishing a massive trove of 250,000 U.S. State Department cables late last year that the financial screws began to tighten.

One after the other, MasterCard Inc., Visa Europe Ltd., Bank of America Corp. Western Union Co. and Ebay Inc.'s PayPal stopped processing donations to WikiLeaks, starving the organization of cash as it was coming under intense political, financial and legal pressure.

Assange said Monday that the restrictions - imposed in early December - had cut off some 95 percent of the money he believes his organization could have received.

WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson defended the estimate as "conservative," noting that in 2010 the average monthly donation to WikiLeaks had been more than 100,000 euros ($140,000), while in 2011 the amount had fallen to between 6,000 and 7,000 euros.

Each company has given its own explanation for the blockade, expressing some level of concern over the nature of the secret-spilling site. But WikiLeaks supporters often point out that MasterCard and Visa still process payments for fringe groups such as the American KKK or the far-right British National Party and that neither WikiLeaks nor any of its staff have been charged with any crime.

Assange said his group was being subjected to corporate censorship, a sentiment backed by Dave Winer, a visiting scholar at New York University's Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute.

"This was done without due process, without any charges, and has been in place since December last year," he said in a blog post about the blockade. "If I want to give $100 to WikiLeaks, and if I want to use my credit card to do so, who are they to say I can't?"

WikiLeaks has recently taken steps to work around the , including a series of auctions and moves toward cell phone-enabled donations. Assange said Monday that his group was switching its focus from soliciting small-time donations, which typically net about $25, to getting money from a "constellation of wealthy individuals."

He didn't elaborate, but Assange has several wealthy backers, including Frontline Club founder Vaughan Smith, whose manor house in eastern England has been put at Assange's disposal while he fights extradition to Sweden on sex crime allegations.

A decision on whether to extradite him is expected in the next few weeks. Speaking to journalists after Monday's appearance, Assange put his chances of being extradited without the possibility of appeal at "30 percent."

Also looming in the background is a U.S. grand jury investigation into WikiLeaks' disclosures. Earlier this month a small California-based Internet provider became the second company to confirm it was fighting a court order demanding customer account information as part of the American inquiry.

WikiLeaks' suspected source, U.S. Army intelligence analyst Bradley Manning, remains in custody at Fort Leavenworth prison in Kansas.

Explore further: Facebook goes retro with 'Rooms' chat app

More information:
WikiLeaks: http://wikileaks.ch/

Frontline Club: http://www.frontlineclub.com/

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

WikiLeaks getting credit card funds

Jul 07, 2011

WikiLeaks has again begun accepting credit card donations, a company affiliated with the secret-spilling site said Thursday.

Visa again blocks funds for WikiLeaks

Jul 08, 2011

(AP) -- Visa said Friday it has closed a donation channel to WikiLeaks after a payment processor briefly accepted money transfers to the anti-secrecy site.

WikiLeaks' payment processor to sue card companies

Dec 09, 2010

(AP) -- WikiLeaks' payment processor said Thursday that it was preparing to sue credit card companies Visa and MasterCard over their refusal to process donations to the secret-spilling website.

WikiLeaks auctions memorabilia to raise funds

Sep 19, 2011

Fancy a signed version of a WikiLeaks diplomatic cable, or a sachet of coffee smuggled out of jail by Julian Assange? Then the cash-strapped whistleblowing website has the auction for you.

Recommended for you

Facebook goes retro with 'Rooms' chat app

Oct 23, 2014

Facebook on Thursday released an application that lets people create virtual "rooms" to chat about whatever they wish using any name they would like.

Some online shoppers pay more than others, study shows

Oct 23, 2014

Internet users regularly receive all kinds of personalized content, from Google search results to product recommendations on Amazon. This is thanks to the complex algorithms that produce results based on users' profiles and ...

User comments : 10

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

GeekBoy
5 / 5 (1) Oct 24, 2011
There are other ways to send money when the government puts the screws to you.
Gift Cards, Cash, Checks.
Collection Agency but not for past due accounts.
kaasinees
4.5 / 5 (8) Oct 24, 2011
Perfect evidence that the banks are the real government.
OverweightAmerican
1 / 5 (7) Oct 24, 2011
It would be a real shame if wikileaks did collapse. But again, I would blame their internal management not being able to mitigate the situation instead of the banks / government. There are other ways to accept donations, as Geek Boy said.
plasticpower
1.5 / 5 (2) Oct 24, 2011
It would be a shame, but damn $3.5 million to pay 20 employees for a year? That's 175k a year. Pretty damn good salary.
Voleure
4.5 / 5 (2) Oct 24, 2011
um plastic... I think the money is soaked up by lawyers...
what do you think? or do you?
rawa1
not rated yet Oct 25, 2011
Principles of private property apparently don't count in capitalistic society, when it comes to principles of free information spreading. How is it possible, the society proclamativelly based on principles of free market blocks the proponents of free exchange of information?

Well, it's the same emergent mechanism, like the situation, when scientific society blocks the cold fusion research. When some principle is applied at sufficiently global scope, it will start to negate itself in the same way, like the dispersive spreading of ripples at the water surface. One important principle of Hegelian dialectics is the transition from quantity to quality.
MarkyMark
1 / 5 (2) Oct 25, 2011
Good riddence to mr god complex. Really posting informants names and addresses and saying tuff luck i care more about myself than there lives, really adds support to the claims of his mental problems that reduces his sence of empathy.
LivaN
5 / 5 (1) Oct 25, 2011
OverweightAmerican
I would blame their internal management not being able to mitigate the situation instead of the banks / government. There are other ways to accept donations, as Geek Boy said.

To blame an organisation's internal management for being unable find a way around the entire international financial system's illegal action is pathetic.

plasticpower
damn $3.5 million to pay 20 employees for a year? That's 175k a year. Pretty damn good salary.

An organisation that has no overheads? Unbelievable. I mean, having most nations and the entire corporate banking system opposing you...must result in a least some costs?
LivaN
5 / 5 (3) Oct 25, 2011
um plastic... I think the money is soaked up by lawyers...
what do you think? or do you?


Security: $300,000
Campaigns: $300,000
Publications Research: $500,000
Technical Information: $500,000
Productions: $400,000
Legal Costs: $1,200,000
Salaries/Staff Expenses: $500,000

http://wikileaks....ade.html

So yes, legal costs do make up the majority.
Eric_B
1 / 5 (1) Oct 29, 2011
"MarkyMark
Good riddence to mr god complex. Really posting informants names and addresses and saying tuff luck i care more about myself than there lives, really adds support to the claims of his mental problems that reduces his sence of empathy."

Such as the case with the leakers in the Bush administration, of course. DOH! Sorry, you are a repugnican voter...