Record companies plan music downloading appeal

Aug 22, 2011

(AP) -- Recording industry attorneys are appealing a recent ruling that reduced the amount of money a Minnesota woman must pay for willfully violating the copyrights of 24 songs.

U.S. District Judge Michael Davis ruled last month that the $1.5 million penalty imposed by a jury was unreasonable, and that Jammie Thomas-Rasset of Brainerd should instead pay $54,000.

The judge also ruled that making copyrighted works available on file-sharing networks does not constitute distribution - a decision that could prevent from telling Thomas-Rasset to stop sharing songs in the future.

Attorneys for the recording industry filed documents Monday indicating they'll appeal both points.

The sued Thomas-Rasset in 2006 for illegally on the file-sharing site Kazaa. The case has seen multiple appeals.

Explore further: Digital dilemma: How will US respond to Sony hack?

5 /5 (4 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Industry wants to ban Minn. woman from downloading

Jul 06, 2009

(AP) -- Just weeks after a federal jury ruled that a Minnesota woman must pay $1.92 million for illegally sharing copyright-protected music, the recording industry wants to make sure she doesn't do it again.

Minnesota song-sharing case heads for 3rd trial

Jan 28, 2010

(AP) -- A trade group representing the major music labels said Wednesday it will reject a reduced penalty for a central Minnesota woman found guilty of sharing 24 songs over the Internet, and will instead begin preparing ...

Atty: MN woman can't pay for sharing songs

Nov 05, 2010

(AP) -- A Minnesota woman ordered to pay a recording industry trade group $1.5 million for illegally sharing music online doesn't plan to pay those damages as her attorneys continue to argue the amount is unconstitutional, ...

Judge slashes 'monstrous' fine in music piracy case

Jan 25, 2010

Condemning a two-million-dollar fine meted out to a Minnesota woman for illegally downloading music over the Internet as "monstrous and shocking," a judge has slashed the penalty to 54,000 dollars.

Recommended for you

Digital dilemma: How will US respond to Sony hack?

Dec 18, 2014

The detective work blaming North Korea for the Sony hacker break-in appears so far to be largely circumstantial, The Associated Press has learned. The dramatic conclusion of a Korean role is based on subtle ...

UN General Assembly OKs digital privacy resolution

Dec 18, 2014

The U.N. General Assembly has approved a resolution demanding better digital privacy protections for people around the world, another response to Edward Snowden's revelations about U.S. government spying.

Online privacy to remain thorny issue: survey

Dec 18, 2014

Online privacy will remain a thorny issue over the next decade, without a widely accepted system that balances user rights and personal data collection, a survey of experts showed Thursday.

Spain: Google News vanishes amid 'Google Tax' spat

Dec 16, 2014

Google on Tuesday followed through with a pledge to shut down Google News in Spain in reaction to a Spanish law requiring news publishers to receive payment for content even if they are willing to give it away.

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jonnyboy
5 / 5 (2) Aug 22, 2011
about time
racchole
4.3 / 5 (3) Aug 22, 2011
Chalk up another misstep for the recording industry. Five years of legislation for a $50,000 fine should result in at least a few people losing their jobs at the RIAA.
Jeddy_Mctedder
4 / 5 (4) Aug 22, 2011
they are appealing this? is it not ok for her to pay a multiple for the music?
this is just a punitive fine , the government is in the business of punishing people for thefts of less than 24$.

this is retarded.
Graeme
3.8 / 5 (5) Aug 22, 2011
The government should make clear legislation on the circumstances of music sharing and set penalties, and not let courts and lawyers come up with ridiculous penalties.
Jeddy_Mctedder
3 / 5 (2) Aug 22, 2011
they want to permanently bankrupt somone for a theft of less than 24 dollars.
this is just insane.
Pattern_chaser
3.7 / 5 (3) Aug 23, 2011
Record companies are no longer needed or wanted. If we download direct from the artists, we can pay an awful lot less, and they will still receive more. Record companies have never cared about music or artists, only their own profits. Now they're reaping what they sowed. I shan't miss them.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.