Rapid venom evolution in pit vipers may be defensive
Research published recently in PLoS One delivers new insight about rapid toxin evolution in venomous snakes: pitvipers such as rattlesnakes may be engaged in an arms race with opossums, a group of snake-eating American marsupials. Although some mammals have long been known to eat venomous snakes, this fact has not been factored into previous explanations for the rapid evolution of snake venom. Instead, snake venom is usually seen as a feeding, or trophic, adaptation. But new molecular research on snake-eating opossums by researchers affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History suggests that predators factor into the rapid evolution of snake venom.
"Snake venom toxins evolve incredibly rapidly," says Robert Voss, curator in the Department of Mammalogy at the American Museum of Natural History. "Most herpetologists interpret this as evidence that venom in snakes evolves because of interactions with their prey, but if that were true you would see equally rapid evolution in toxin-targeted molecules of prey species, which has not yet been seen. What we've found is that a venom-targeted protein is evolving rapidly in mammals that eat snakes. That suggests that venom has a defensive as well as a trophic role."
Several groups of mammals are known for their ability to eat venomous snakes, including hedgehogs, mongooses, and some opossums. Opossums, which belong to the marsupial family Didelphidae, consist of about one hundred known and several dozen undescribed species. Most of these opossums live in Central and South America, although there is one representative in the north that is familiar to those who spend time outside at night: the Virginia opossum.
Some didelphids, including the Virginia opossum, are known to eat rattlesnakes, copperheads, and some species of tropical pitvipers known as lanceheads. All of these pitvipers have venom containing dozens of highly toxic compounds, including many that attack blood proteins, causing massive internal hemorrhaging in nonresistant warm-blooded prey species, mainly rodents and birds.
The new research came out of a previous phylogenetic study of marsupials, published as a Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, that suggested unusually rapid evolution in one gene among a group of snake-eating opossums. The rapidly evolving gene codes for von Willebrand's factor, an important blood-clotting protein that is known to be the target of several snake-venom toxins. The association of rapid evolution in a venom-targeted gene among just those opossums known to eat pitvipers was the essential clue that prompted further study.
"This finding took us by surprise," says Sharon Jansa, associate professor in the Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior at the University of Minnesota and a Museum research associate. "We sequenced several genesincluding the one that codes for von Willebrand Factor (vWF)to use in a study of opossum phylogeny. Once we started to analyze the data, vWF was a real outlier. It was evolving much more rapidly than expected in a group of opossums that also, as it turns out, are resistant to pitviper venom."
The recently published research demonstrates that the rate of replacement substitutions (nucleotide changes that result in amino-acid changes) is much higher than the rate of silent substitutions (nucleotide changes that have no effect on the protein) in the von Willebrand Factor gene among pitviper-eating opossums. Typically, high rates of replacement substitutions means that the gene is under strong, sustained natural selection. That only happens in a few evolutionary circumstances.
"Most nucleotide substitutions have little or no effect on protein function, but that doesn't seem to be the case with vWF in these venom-resistant opossums," says Jansa. "The specific amino acids in vWF that interact with toxin proteins show unexpectedly high rates of replacement substitutions. These substitutions undoubtedly affect protein function, suggesting that the vWF protein can no longer be attacked by these snake toxins."
"It is so uncommon to find genes under strong positive selection, that the exceptions are really interesting and often conform to one evolutionary circumstance when two organisms are coevolving with each other," says Voss. "We've known for years that venom genes evolve rapidly in snakes, but the partner in this arms race was unknown until now. Opossums eat snakes because they can."
Provided by American Museum of Natural History
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
What would stain as translucent on light-coloured fabric?
17 hours ago
-
How do I identify different bacteria on culture plates?
May 26, 2012
-
Why Do Dogs do Strange things...
May 25, 2012
-
What does exophillic and endophillic mean in terms of mosquito and their control?
May 24, 2012
-
Semen stains glows under black lights (uv light)?
May 23, 2012
-
Question on Human Chromosome 2
May 23, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Biology
More news stories
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
16 hours ago |
3.3 / 5 (17) |
51
More plant species responding to global warming than previously thought
(Phys.org) -- Far more wild plant species may be responding to global warming than previous large-scale estimates have suggested.
May 22, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (14) |
18
|
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
May 26, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (4) |
7
For monogamous sparrows, it doesn't pay to stray (but they do it anyway)
It's quite common for a female song sparrow to stray from her breeding partner and mate with the male next door, but a new study shows that sleeping around can be costly.
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (2) |
7
|
Study uncovers secret to speedy burrowing by razor clams
(Phys.org) -- If you look at a razor burrowing clam sitting in a bucket, youd never guess that it could burrow itself down into the soil, much less do it with any speed. Razor clams look like fat straws, ...
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Not that we'll see KevinRTS on this one... too much evidence for evolution works the same way as garlic and sunshine...
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (5)
I am visualizing Lamarck in some other world ... I'm not sure if he's happy to realize that people are still hanging on to his ideas after all these centuries, or in despair over the fact that in all that
time nobody's come up with a better argument for them.
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 0.7 / 5 (49)
The random-string-of-characters username, 2 day old regdate, and only having posted in this topic kind of give it away.
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (8)
Jul 19, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Jul 19, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
[sarcasm mode on]
Yes, and the mind certainly can control quantum states of individual atoms in your body.
[sarcasm mode off]
You have to take into account what the mind can do via electric impulses viz: Control over muscles, senory apparatus and glands (i.e. anything that is enervated via nerve cells).
DNA does not fit that bill.
Jul 19, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Jul 19, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
FH, you're trying too hard. TK's pseudo-Lamarckian ideas predate modern evo science, no matter how hard TK tries to dress them up in whizzy bafflegab.
In a previous existence, I suggested I was serving a useful purpose by providing opportunities to those who like to argue over slender pretexts. I am pleased to see I am doing the same in my new existence.
Jul 19, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
The DNA trepair mechanism is one (of many) autonomous mechnaisms working in the body (e.g. our immune system or the system that keeps our pH balance within acceptable limits)
Consider yourself scoffed.
Jul 19, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Have you talked to Deepak Chopra about this? I am sure he would be fascinated. But no doubt he would suggest adding in comments about quantum physics, too.
I am not ruling out that TK is taking the mickey. But that would make talking to Deepak C even more fun.
Jul 19, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
"When you're out of scoff ... you're out of jeer."
Jul 19, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
You remind me of a boy in an English boarding school, "mum doesn't come around very much"; smart and lonely. You don't make any real rebuttal, you just snipe and expect to hide behind the backs of others who share your predispositions.Make a scientific-based argument that disproves my assertions.
Jul 19, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Eh? I was half-thinking you were joking. I found it hard to believe you were serious.
But it seems you aren't. If you're challenging me to give you a clue, I concede defeat as fast as I possibly can: "MISSION IMPOSSIBLE!"
If you do want to get refutations, I suggest you offer a $10,000 prize to anyone who can convince you that you're wrong. Admittedly, anyone with sense knows that really means: "I'll give away $10,000 before I'll admit that I'm wrong." Offer as big a prize as you like, your money is safe.
Jul 19, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Another thing that I'm right about is that your histrionics are a weak attempt to weasel your way out of a direct challenge. You have nothing at all to say.
Jul 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Oh, I never thought it was much, I was just being silly. But the difference between you and me is that I'm silly on purpose.
Bored now. THE END.
Jul 19, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Yes, but he said it in such an eloquently whimsical way, you gotta give him props.
Jul 20, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (3)
Jul 20, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Sorry, but yes, I do.
Not really. He's pretty much stated his case and signed off.
Jul 20, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
"Not really. He's pretty much stated his case and signed off."
- in a huff.
Jul 24, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
So, 'possums are good for something besides speed bumps.
Jul 24, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
"Why did the chicken cross the road?"
"To show the possum it could be done."
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Now there IS a mechanism for increasing the rate of mutation but there is no way to controll where the mutations occur. When an organism is under stress it produces various chemicals that can increase mutation rates. Mutations are random and not directed. The direction of evolution comes from the environment not some magical knowledge of how all the chemicals interact.
Now that one you got right. He seems to be an evader.
Ethelred
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
http://gvgpd.prob...read=631
I am pretty he is the Administrator on that thread.
Ethelred
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Tired yes, waspish no. I have well learned not to rise to the bait any longer when a troll demands that I "refute his claims" ... that is, give him a clue.
"I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that." If I have a serious argument to make, I'm going to make it in a serious fashion and not in weary online exchanges with people who are playing the clown.
Mind you, I'm perfectly willing to play the clown if it amuses me, but when I do so it is very much on purpose.