Marketing instructor predicts Olympic locales

Jul 13, 2011

Greg Dumont doesn't need a crystal ball to predict where the next Olympic Games will be held ... he has science on his side.

The University of Akron marketing instructor developed a model, as part of his doctoral dissertation, to discern which Olympic bidding criteria are most critical in differentiating a winning bid from competing alternatives. To do this, he analyzed competing bids for the 2008 Beijing Games, 2010 Vancouver Games, 2012 London Games, 2014 Sochi Games, 2016 Rio Games and 2018 Winter Games. His model accurately predicts the winning bid in five of the six aforementioned Olympiads while also predicting the voting results for the 2010, 2014, 2016 and 2018 in rank order.

The International Olympic Committee's July 6 announcement that Pyeongchang, South Korea, will be the host nation for the 2018 Winter Games further validated Dumont's model.

"The IOC's announcement both confirmed what my model predicted and justifies my confidence in this research as I prepare to defend my dissertation," Dumont says. "Outside of South Korea, I was probably the most excited individual to hear the IOC announcement.

"As more and more countries express interest in competing for the right to stage/host a finite number of global mega events, I am committed to revising the in an effort to better understand the unique bidding process of the FIFA World Cup, Commonwealth Games, political conventions and the like," he says.

Explore further: Hyperbolic homogeneous polynomials, oh my!

Provided by University of Akron

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Smithsonian holds vote on video games for exhibit

Feb 21, 2011

(AP) -- The Smithsonian American Art Museum is asking the public to help select video games that will be included in its first exhibit to explore the art and visual effects of gaming.

Message from space for Olympic athletes

Feb 27, 2006

From one international cooperation to another, the crew of the International Space Station (ISS), American William McArthur and Russian Valery Tokarev, yesterday congratulated the Olympic athletes gathered ...

An Olympic Forecast

Feb 15, 2010

The Vancouver Winter Olympics will not only challenge world-class athletes, but also a team of almost 100 meteorologists and atmospheric scientists tasked to provide the weather forecasts that keep the events ...

Recommended for you

Not just the poor live hand-to-mouth

13 hours ago

When the economy hits the skids, government stimulus checks to the poor sometimes follow. Stimulus programs—such as those in 2001, 2008 and 2009—are designed to boost the economy quickly by getting cash ...

Math modeling handbook now available

16 hours ago

Math comes in handy for answering questions about a variety of topics, from calculating the cost-effectiveness of fuel sources and determining the best regions to build high-speed rail to predicting the spread ...

Archaeologists, tribe clash over Native remains

17 hours ago

Archaeologists and Native Americans are clashing over Indian remains and artifacts that were excavated during a construction project in the San Francisco Bay Area, but then reburied at an undisclosed location.

Male-biased tweeting

19 hours ago

Today women take an active part in public life. Without a doubt, they also converse with other women. In fact, they even talk to each other about other things besides men. As banal as it sounds, this is far ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Squirrel
not rated yet Jul 13, 2011
So which did Greg Dumont get wrong of 2008 Beijing Games, 2010 Vancouver Games, 2012 London Games, 2014 Sochi Games, 2016 Rio Games and 2018 Winter Games?
antialias_physorg
3 / 5 (1) Jul 13, 2011
he analyzed competing bids for the 2008 Beijing Games, 2010 Vancouver Games, 2012 London Games, 2014 Sochi Games, 2016 Rio Games and 2018 Winter Games. His model accurately predicts the winning bid in five of the six aforementioned Olympiads while also predicting the voting results for the 2010, 2014, 2016 and 2018 Olympics in rank order.

Is this a joke? That's not even close to a representative sample to give this analysis any kind of power. Not by a long shot.

And he got a PhD for this? Laughable. His statistics supervisor should have thrown it out on the spot (and if he passed it HE should have been sacked on the spot).

More news stories

Male-biased tweeting

Today women take an active part in public life. Without a doubt, they also converse with other women. In fact, they even talk to each other about other things besides men. As banal as it sounds, this is far ...

Not just the poor live hand-to-mouth

When the economy hits the skids, government stimulus checks to the poor sometimes follow. Stimulus programs—such as those in 2001, 2008 and 2009—are designed to boost the economy quickly by getting cash ...

Archaeologists, tribe clash over Native remains

Archaeologists and Native Americans are clashing over Indian remains and artifacts that were excavated during a construction project in the San Francisco Bay Area, but then reburied at an undisclosed location.

When things get glassy, molecules go fractal

Colorful church windows, beads on a necklace and many of our favorite plastics share something in common—they all belong to a state of matter known as glasses. School children learn the difference between ...

FCC to propose pay-for-priority Internet standards

The Federal Communications Commission is set to propose new open Internet rules that would allow content companies to pay for faster delivery over the so-called "last mile" connection to people's homes.