A plan for better banking: Researchers propose model of systemwide diversification

Jul 25, 2011 By Paul Massari
“You want the banks to be diversified, but in different ways, so that the conditions that would cause one bank to fail would be different than the conditions that would cause another bank to fail,” said David Rand, a researcher at Harvard’s Program for Evolutionary Dynamics. Credit: Cole Latimer/Harvard Staff

As much of the developed world continues to dig out from the impact of the 2008 financial crisis, a team of researchers at Harvard and in London has created a model of bank failure aimed at helping economies avoid crashes. Their work highlights a fundamental dilemma for regulators: Improving the safety of individual banks may make the financial system as a whole more dangerous.

Developed by Nicholas Beale, chairman of Sciteb, a consulting firm based in London, and David Rand and Martin Nowak, researchers at Harvard’s Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, the model considers risks to financial systems rather than those faced only by individual banks. The team’s paper, Individual Versus Systemic Risk and the Regulator’s Dilemma, appears online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science Early Edition.

“We used a simple model to illustrate an idea that, on reflection, people understand instinctively,” says Rand. “When many banks do the same thing, simultaneous bank failures become very likely.”

Therefore, the authors argue, it is not enough to ensure that every bank is diversified and pursuing a low-risk strategy.  “You want the banks to be diversified,” Rand says, “but in different ways, so that the conditions that would cause one bank to fail would be different than the conditions that would cause another bank to fail.” Regulators should therefore promote “diverse diversification,” and encourage individual banks to pursue risk strategies that are distinct from those of their competitors, even if this increases the risk that any one bank might fail.

The good news, according to Rand and Beale, is that the has spurred regulators to think about the stability of financial systems as a whole. In this climate, the authors hope regulators will encourage banks to pursue more distinctive strategies in order to create a more resilient financial system. “We believe this can be achieved without a central authority directing the banks in particular areas,” says Beale.

Instead, he envisions a regulatory scheme that encourages diversity by basing the amount of capital a bank is required to hold on the extent to which its investment strategy contributes to systemic risk. “With the right regulations, market forces will encourage the banks to make a more robust system. But unless these problems are addressed, having a more uniform global regulatory system could actually make the next crash much worse,” says Beale.

“Beale, et al., have contributed an important insight that individual bank-risk diversification does not add up to system diversification,” says Professor Andrew Sheng of Tsinghua University, who is chief adviser to the China Banking Regulatory Commission.

Beale says that the team’s focus now is building a global alliance for financial and economic resilience.

“We’re bringing together leading academics, regulators, , and investors,” he says. “Provided a systemic risk capital is set in a sensible way, we have a chance of avoiding the next crisis.”

This work was supported in the United Kingdom by the Man Group and Fidelity Investments, and at Harvard by the John Templeton Foundation. Beale, Rand, and Nowak’s team also included Heather Battey, Karen Croxson, and Robert M. May.

Explore further: A third of U.S. low-wage workers are only earners in household

Related Stories

Bodies for sale

Dec 22, 2010

For some people, intellectual property is about faster computers and better apps. But for Kara Swanson, a new professor at the Northeastern University School of Law, it’s about body products — literally.

New banking bureaucracy may not help consumers

Jul 22, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- There's a better way to help banking customers than the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) that opened for business July 21, says a banking expert at Washington University in St. Louis.

Banks have difficulty adapting in crisis: study

May 18, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Can the financial sector regulate itself? A study carried out by EPFL’s Swiss Finance Institute, involving 350 American institutions, shows that those that perform poorly in times of ...

Recommended for you

Drugmaker GSK slashes annual profits forecast

Jul 23, 2014

British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline on Wednesday slashed its 2014 profits forecast as second-quarter earnings sank on the back of weak US trade, adverse currency moves and a Chinese bribery probe.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (1) Jul 25, 2011
"Regulators should therefore promote diverse diversification, and encourage individual banks to pursue risk strategies that are distinct from those of their competitors, even if this increases the risk that any one bank might fail."
"We believe this can be achieved without a central authority directing the banks in particular areas, says Beale."
Really?
The only way this can happen in the USA is for the elimination of the Federal Reserve system.
Jotaf
not rated yet Jul 25, 2011
That's right, you can have multiple actors following the optimal strategy (in this case, the banks), and still not get optimal results; not due to bad luck, but because under some conditions all actors must agree on a sub-optimal strategy (from their point of view) for the global outcome to be optimal.

For example, stealing may be better than working hard from your point of view; but if everyone did that, society as a whole would be much worse. See Nash equilibrium and all that.

The author's suggestion of basing the minimum capital on the impact of a bank to the systemic risk is spot on IMO. You calculate the systemic risk with and without the bank, and the capital must be proportional to the difference. Seems pretty robust -- banks will naturally gravitate to cover all niches and strategies.
stealthc
1 / 5 (1) Jul 26, 2011
I'll pass on the banks, jesus warned us to be wary of those people they are called "money changers". They will fool us to place value on something so worthless that they will make hell on earth; a place where people will work as slaves for nothing. Another word for inflation is "banker tax".