Novel geothermal technology packs a one-two punch against climate change

Jun 06, 2011

Two University of Minnesota Department of Earth Sciences researchers have developed an innovative approach to tapping heat beneath the Earth's surface. The method is expected to not only produce renewable electricity far more efficiently than conventional geothermal systems, but also help reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) -- dealing a one-two punch against climate change.

The approach, termed CO2-plume geothermal system, or CPG, was developed by Earth sciences faculty member Martin Saar and graduate student Jimmy Randolph in the university's College of Science and Engineering. The research was published in the most recent issue of . The researchers have applied for a patent and plan to form a start-up company to commercialize the new technology.

Established methods for transforming Earth's heat into electricity involve extracting hot water from rock formations several hundred feet from the Earth's surface at the few natural around the world, then using the hot water to turn power-producing turbines. The university's novel system was born in a flash of insight on a northern Minnesota road trip and jump-started with $600,000 in funding from the U of M Institute on the Environment's Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment (IREE). The CPG system uses high-pressure CO2 instead of water as the underground heat-carrying fluid.

CPG provides a number of advantages over other geothermal systems, Randolph said. First, CO2 travels more easily than water through , so it can extract heat more readily. As a result, CPG can be used in regions where conventional geothermal electricity production would not make sense from a technical or economic standpoint.

"This is probably viable in areas you couldn't even think about doing regular geothermal for ," Randolph said. "In areas where you could, it's perhaps twice as efficient."

CPG also offers the benefit of preventing CO2 from reaching the atmosphere by sequestering it deep underground, where it cannot contribute to . In addition, because pure CO2 is less likely than water to dissolve the material around it, CPG reduces the risk of a geothermal system not being able to operate for long times due to "short-circuiting" or plugging the flow of fluid through the hot rocks. Moreover, the technology could be used in parallel to boost fossil fuel production by pushing natural gas or oil from partially depleted reservoirs as CO2 is injected.

Saar and Randolph first hit on the idea behind CPG in the fall of 2008 while driving to northern Minnesota together to conduct unrelated field research. The two had been conducting research on geothermal energy capture and separately on geologic CO2 sequestration.

"We connected the dots and said, 'Wait a minute – what are the consequences if you use geothermally heated CO2?'" recalled Saar. "We had a hunch in the car that there should be lots of advantages to doing that."

After batting the idea around a bit, the pair applied for and received a grant from the Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment, which disburses funds from Xcel Energy's Renewable Development Fund to help launch potentially transformative projects in emerging fields of energy and the environment. The IREE grant paid for preliminary computer modeling and allowed Saar and Randolph to bring on board energy policy, applied economics and mechanical engineering experts from the University of Minnesota as well as modeling experts from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. It also helped leverage a $1.5 million grant from the U.S. Department of Energy to explore subsurface chemical interactions involved in the process.

"The IREE grant was really critical," Saar said. "This is the kind of project that requires a high-risk investment. I think it's fair to say that there's a good chance that it wouldn't have gone anywhere without IREE support in the early days."

Saar and Randolph have recently applied for additional DOE funding to move CPG forward to the pilot phase.

"Part of the beauty of this is that it combines a lot of ideas but the ideas are essentially technically proven, so we don't need a lot of new technology developed," Randolph said.

"It's combining proven technology in a new way," Saar said. "It's one of those things where you know how the individual components work. The question is, how will they perform together in this new way? The simulation results suggest it's going to be very favorable."

Explore further: NASA sees Tropical Depression Polo winding down

Related Stories

Zero-emission electricity studied to power the Galilee Basin

Feb 10, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- In the wake of mining billionaire Clive Palmer’s announcement to build six mines in the Galilee Basin, UQ research is investigating the possibility of emission-free electricity from a plentiful underground ...

Mines could provide geothermal energy

Jul 27, 2009

Mine shafts on the point of being closed down could be used to provide geothermal energy to local towns. This is the conclusion of two engineers from the University of Oviedo, whose research is being published ...

New funding will stimulate alternative energy research

Nov 16, 2009

Initiatives to provide geothermal heating or power at the Pueblo of Jemez and the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology campus are receiving Los Alamos National Laboratory assistance, thanks to recent American Reinvestment ...

The Inexhaustible Energy Source Beneath Our Feet

May 24, 2004

According to the expert Willy Gehrer, the environmentally friendly generation of electricity from geothermal sources is going to play an important role in the future of energy production. “I’m convinced that ...

Underground CO2 storage study to begin

Oct 25, 2007

The University of Texas has received a $38 million subcontract to conduct the first U.S. long-term study of underground carbon dioxide storage.

Recommended for you

Study links changing winds to warming in Pacific

20 hours ago

A new study released Monday found that warming temperatures in Pacific Ocean waters off the coast of North America over the past century closely followed natural changes in the wind, not increases in greenhouse ...

NASA image: Wildfires in Khabarovsk Krai, Russia

20 hours ago

Most of the fires captured in this image burn in Khabarovsk Krai, a territory occupying the coastline of the Sea of Okhotsk. Dozens of red hotspots, accompanied by plumes of smoke mark active fires. The smoke, ...

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

fmfbrestel
5 / 5 (1) Jun 06, 2011
Sounds promising. Best of luck to ya!
Bob_Kob
1 / 5 (2) Jun 06, 2011
One two punch, makes electricity and removes waste heat from the core thus lowering global warming! We humans have it all figured out...
zevkirsh
2.4 / 5 (5) Jun 06, 2011
what a load of nonsense. 600k washed down the drain. but i applaud the effort.

hot , high pressure c02 is incredibly reactive and will destroy the rock by dissolving it far quicker than water. further more, it will gum up the circulation pipes with dissolved minerals far faster than hot water. so this idea is total shit.
jimbo92107
not rated yet Jun 06, 2011
A classic case of fortune favoring the prepared mind.
Bradfield
5 / 5 (1) Jun 06, 2011
For those who doubt the feasibility of this project the following proves interesting reading

http://skemman.is...gler.pdf

It'd be 600k well worth spent
astro_optics
1 / 5 (2) Jun 06, 2011
NEW Zealand all over again, when you stuff around with Geothermal energy, you cool down the earth's crust, hence more likely you'll have earthquakes...this should have been learned from New Zealand experience...
Caliban
2.3 / 5 (3) Jun 07, 2011
what a load of nonsense. 600k washed down the drain. but i applaud the effort.

hot , high pressure c02 is incredibly reactive and will destroy the rock by dissolving it far quicker than water. further more, it will gum up the circulation pipes with dissolved minerals far faster than hot water. so this idea is total shit.


Bingo!

Plus, pressurized CO2 would bubble right through any relict oil or gas trapped in a decomissioned well.

I'm really surprised that Physorg even printed this story, much less that it was printed in such an entirely uncritical fashion.