What's to blame for wild weather? 'La Nada'
June 28, 2011 By Dauna Coulter
The blue and purple band in this satellite image of the Pacific Ocean traces the cool waters of the La Niņa phenomenon in December 2010. Credit: Ocean Surface Topography Mission (OSTM)/Jason-2 satellite, NASA JPL
(PhysOrg.com) -- Record snowfall, killer tornadoes, devastating floods: Theres no doubt about it. Since Dec. 2010, the weather in the USA has been positively wild. But why?
Some recent news reports have attributed the phenomenon to an extreme "La Niña," a band of cold water stretching across the Pacific Ocean with global repercussions for climate and weather. But NASA climatologist Bill Patzert names a different suspect: "La Nada."
"La Niña was strong in December," he says. "But back in January it pulled a disappearing act and left us with nothing La Nada to constrain the jet stream. Like an unruly teenager, the jet stream took advantage of the newfound freedom--and the results were disastrous."
La Niña and El Niño are opposite extremes of a great Pacific oscillation. Every 2 to 7 years, surface waters across the equatorial Pacific warm up (El Niño) and then they cool down again (La Niña). Each condition has its own distinct effects on weather.
This satellite image, taken in April 2011, reveals La Niņa's rapid exit from the equator near the US coast. The cool (false-color blue) water was gone by early spring. Credit: Ocean Surface Topography Mission (OSTM)/Jason-2 satellite, NASA JPL
The winter of 2010 began with La Niña conditions taking hold. A "normal" La Niña would have pushed the jet stream northward, pushing cold arctic air (one of the ingredients of severe weather) away from the lower US. But this La Niña petered out quickly, and no El Niño rose up to replace it. The jet stream was free to misbehave."By mid-January 2011, La Niña weakened rapidly and by mid-February it was 'adios La Niña,' allowing the jet stream to meander wildly around the US. Consequently the weather pattern became dominated by strong outbreaks of frigid polar air, producing blizzards across the West, Upper Midwest, and northeast US."
The situation lingered into spring -- and things got ugly. Russell Schneider, Director of the NOAA-NWS Storm Prediction Center, explains: "First, very strong winds out of the south carrying warm, moist air from the Gulf of Mexico met cold jet stream winds racing in from the west. Stacking these two air masses on top of each other created the degree of instability that fuels intense thunderstorms."
Extreme contrasts in wind speeds and directions of the upper and lower atmosphere transformed ordinary thunderstorms into long-lived rotating supercells capable of producing violent tornadoes.
In Patzert's words, "The jet stream -- on steroids -- acted as an atmospheric mix master, causing tornadoes to explode across Dixie and Tornado Alleys, and even into Massachusetts."
All this because of a flaky La Niña?
"La Niña and El Niño affect the atmosphere's energy balance because they determine the location of warm water in the Pacific, and that in turn determines where huge clusters of tropical thunderstorms form," explains Schneider. "These storms are the main energy source from the tropics influencing the large scale pattern of the jet stream that flows through the US."
In agreement with Patzert, he notes that the very strong and active jet stream across the lower US in April "may have been related to the weakening La Niña conditions observed over the tropical Pacific."
And of course there's this million dollar question: "Does any research point to climate change as a cause of this wild weather?"
"Global warming is certainly happening," asserts Patzert, "but we can't discount global warming or blame it for the 2011 tornado season. We just don't know ... Yet."
What will happen next? And please don't say, "La Nada."
Provided by Science@NASA
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
11 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (13) |
37
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
What's the big deal about private space launches?
(AP) -- The first private spaceship is headed to the International Space Station. Some questions and answers about the cargo mission by Space Exploration Technologies, known as SpaceX:
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (6) |
32
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...

Jun 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
This was good for a drought in the southern region, but it came at an expense. Major campgrounds still have feet of snow to melt, which would be gone by the first week of June typically.
Lots of thunder-snow this year as well, as well as high winds as high pressures ran headlong into strong low pressures. Both unusual for Sal Lake City snowstorms. These conditions came with nearly every major front.
Jun 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Jun 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Jun 28, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Maybe the government has found out how to manipulate the weather, like that Swiss company Meteo Systems with their "WEATHERTEC";-P Or otherwise I guess all this is due to some natural forces(?)
Jun 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Jun 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
Few may be alive to remember, but that is why records are kept.
Jun 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Jun 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (8)
It is, in fact, the violently unstable solar core [2] that controls our fate.
Giant moderators here (air and oceans) and surrounding the solar core (iron-rich mantle and H-rich atmosphere) moderate the solar core's impulsive violence.
See:
1. Stuart Clark, The Sun Kings: The Unexpected Tragedy of Richard Carrington and the Tale of How Modern Astronomy Began (Princeton University Press, 2007) 217 pages
http://books.goog...0KokYsIC
2. O Manuel, Neutron Repulsion, The APEIRON Journal, in press, 19 pages (2011):
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Jun 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jun 29, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
----------------------------------------------------------
The "certainly" part is an overstatement. The data don't support that; the late '90s were a near-cycle peak, apparently. One "certainly" shouldn't rely on the disputed, massaged temperature data from the agenda-driven IPCC for confirmation of warming.
Jun 29, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Its a sad world when people start ignoring irrefutable data because of political beliefs.
Jun 29, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jun 29, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
Yes it is certainly sad when AGWites censor, ignore and ridicule data that supports the impact of the sun on the earth's climate. Instead they have faith in GCMs that fail and disregard a fundamental tenet of science, correlation is not causation.
12000 years ago CT was covered by glaciers. Fortunately the weather has warmed since then.
Jun 29, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
The Suns violently unstable neutron core gave birth to the Solar System five billion years ago, including the material that comprises us and planet Earth [1-4].
Continued emissions from the solar core bath us with photons, particles and fields (sunlight, heat and energy) that sustain us.
Despite all his knowledge and illusion of power and self-importance, mankind is totally dependent on the forces of Nature.
That unpalatable truth in the main conclusion to my research career [5].
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
1. Nature 262, 28 (1976)
www.nature.com/na...8a0.html
2. Science 195, 208 (1977)
www.omatumr.com/a...enon.pdf
3. Nature 277, 615 (1979)
www.nature.com/na...5a0.html
4. Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002)
http://arxiv.org/.../0501441
5. "A Journey to the Core of the Sun", in process.
Oliver K. Manuel
Jun 29, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
isn't ryggesogn2 the same person as marjon? It's only convenient for you to use the "records" when they fit your view of things buddy.
---------------------------------
On a separate note, colorado has seen record snowfalls this winter and we're just getting the melt in our rivers now. Later than usual. A lot wetter spring as well and we were still getting snow in may I think. some of our sky stations are still open ahah. Weird weather alright
as a side note, it isn't only the US experiencing weird weather. I know France has a record drought going.
------------------
Last but not least, as always the trolls come by. omatur with his sun = iron = omg article spam post. Marjon with his/her head in the sand. HI TROLLS !!! /wave
Jun 29, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Jun 30, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Last Ice age as evidence??? OF WHAT, that you've got pre-determined ideas on science?
Really. With scientists such as these for support, even I, who am unconvinced of either position, am starting to wonder.
Jun 30, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I've also often said we should be saving up all this fossil CO2 for use when earth really needs it, to avoid falling into the next ice age, perhaps in a century or five. But no, we'll waste it all now, and dessertify our croplands while we do it. Idiots, dumber than yeast.
Jun 30, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (4)
The finding confirms previous data that elevated levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere lagged behind the initial warming event - by about 1000 years - and that the principal driver of climate change is the sun, with carbon dioxide ( CO2 ) amplifying the effects."
http://www.rsc.or...0702.asp
Since there were no SUVs 19000 years ago, what started the glaciers to melt?
Jun 30, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (3)
And that "1000 year lag" argument is not proof of anything except that the natural GHG feedback cycle DOES, agreed, need some other trigger event to get it started. A VERY slight, fractional-degree warming from Milankovitch cycles, usually.
But a bunch of stupid apes burning everything in sight can also act nicely as a trigger. And a big warming trigger, started at the height of a warm period in the Milankovitch cycle, can very possibly send the system into completely unknown territory.
We're absolutely crazy to be doing this experiment, with unknown results, on the only spaceship in the universe we know of which can support our species.
Jun 30, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (4)
Jun 30, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (5)
They ignored the Sun and scared us about global cooling in 1974:
www.time.com/time...,00.html
They ignored the Sun and changed the story to global warming.
Whether or not propaganda artists like it, the Sun is Earth's heat source:
Superfluidity in the Solar Interior:
Implications for Solar Eruptions and Climate
Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002)
http://arxiv.org/.../0501441
Earth's Heat Source - The Sun
Energy & Environ. 20, 131-144 (2009)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0905.0704
"Neutron Repulsion", APEIRON
J. in press, 19 pages (2011)
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Jun 30, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (4)
Jul 03, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Jul 04, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Jul 04, 2011
Rank: not rated yet