I know you, bad guy! Magpies recognize humans
Most people who have had the experience of having pet animals in their houses have the gut feeling that the animals can "recognize" us. They seem to recognize our faces, our voices and our smell. One way or another, they respond to us differently from other people.
Actually, this is not just a gut feeling. Numerous studies have shown that domesticated animals, such as honey bees, chickens, pigeons, sheep, dogs, llamas, penguins, seals, rabbits, horses, lizards and octopuses, can recognize humans individually. The common thing among these animals is that they are exposed to an environment where they see humans and interact with humans every day. Then the question is, can the wild animals recognize people too?
Although there are many anecdotes that wild animals do so, experimental evidence is surprisingly scant. Only very recently, Northern mockingbirds and American crows have been shown to recognize humans who threatened their nests or captured them.
Well, one more species is added on the list, the Black-billed Magpie. Every spring, researchers from Seoul National University (SNU) and Ewha Womans University are conducting a routine, annual survey of the breeding success of a magpie population within the SNU campus. But something was weird in 2009. One of the crew, Mr. Won Young Lee, a PhD student who was always climbing up the nests and taking out the eggs or chicks for the survey, and also the first author of the paper being printed in the journal Animal Cognition, started to be followed and scolded by the owners of the nests. "I remember", Mr. Lee says, "when a magpie came down from a nest tree scolding at me. I was with a second researcher at that time, and I tried to fool the magpie by giving my cap to the other person. But this did not work! When I moved away the bird followed me rather than the fellow observer wearing my cap". The owners of the nests that were not accessed by him did not show any response to his presence. Based on this "accidental" finding, the researchers quickly designed a field experiment. A pair of humans, a climber and one non-climber, wearing the same clothing, was presented to magpies to see whether magpies show selective responses to climbers. The result was that all the tested magpies showed aggressive responses to the climbers only.
"It was very unusual thing," says Dr. Sang-im Lee, the leader of the magpie survey team at Seoul National University. "We've been doing exactly the same survey every year for more than 15 years but nobody was followed by birds." Then, what was so special about this one, unfortunate, crew member? "Usually we take turns when we climb up the nests. But in 2009, Mr. Lee always climbed to the nests because he was putting cameras into the nests." So, repeated presentation of the same human as a threat to the nests could have facilitated the learning process of magpies, and could have led to the recognition of this crew member.
Since birds, such like magpies, are not that much sensitive to smell, and the distance between the experimenters and the magpies were more than 10 meters, it is not likely that the birds recognize smell of a person. It is more likely that they use vision. And because the climber and the non-climber wore the same clothing and walked similarly in the experiment, what remains the most different between the two humans is the face. Dr. Piotr Jablonski, who designed the experiment in this study, says "it is amazing that magpies can recognize one individual human out of twenty thousand people present in the campus." As a foreigner living in Korea, he confessed that he has had difficulties discriminating people, especially during the first year or two. "All Asian looked similar to me but probably not to the magpies."
Just as Dr. Jablonski's discriminatory skills get better with time and being exposed to more Korean people, the magpies in university campus could have been able to recognize humans who pose threat to their nests by having a lot of exposure to people. This process, hypothesized by the researchers, does not require high level of cognitive skills, which is indicated by a long list of domesticated animals (some of which does not seem to be really smart) that can recognize individual human.
Researchers call for more species to be tested and for future studies with species of clearly different cognitive abilities tested in a standard manner in two types of habitats: heavily human-populated urban areas and wild natural habitats where exposure to human presence is minimal. If the researchers are right, then the animals living in urban areas would show higher level of discriminatory skills to humans than those living in rural areas. How many different animals can recognize us individually and exactly how they recognize us will be revealed after more data is collected.
Provided by Seoul National University
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
What would stain as translucent on light-coloured fabric?
13 hours ago
-
How do I identify different bacteria on culture plates?
23 hours ago
-
Why Do Dogs do Strange things...
May 25, 2012
-
What does exophillic and endophillic mean in terms of mosquito and their control?
May 24, 2012
-
Semen stains glows under black lights (uv light)?
May 23, 2012
-
Question on Human Chromosome 2
May 23, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Biology
More news stories
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
13 hours ago |
3.5 / 5 (11) |
30
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
23 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (4) |
7
More plant species responding to global warming than previously thought
(Phys.org) -- Far more wild plant species may be responding to global warming than previous large-scale estimates have suggested.
May 22, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (14) |
18
|
For monogamous sparrows, it doesn't pay to stray (but they do it anyway)
It's quite common for a female song sparrow to stray from her breeding partner and mate with the male next door, but a new study shows that sleeping around can be costly.
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
7
|
Study uncovers secret to speedy burrowing by razor clams
(Phys.org) -- If you look at a razor burrowing clam sitting in a bucket, youd never guess that it could burrow itself down into the soil, much less do it with any speed. Razor clams look like fat straws, ...
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
May 13, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Are you Fing serious? Is the assumption here that our pets cant tell the difference between their owners and anyone else? This is written as if people actually would ever think that way. "Hey man, I swear Im not like, a hippie or anything, but sometimes I think my dog like, recognizes me, or something. I dont know, I guess thats just crazy though right?"
May 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
May 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
May 14, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
No, you don't understand. If there hasn't been a specific 'scientific' study done then it isn't real. The only place in which you can find any real answers is the journals in which they write this crap down. Why do you even bother spreading your worthless opinions about animals. They are, at best cardboard cut-outs until enough 'studies' have been done to give them properties. I'd even be hesitant to say that they're made of flesh if I hadn't read that study they did on that...
May 14, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
http://www.spring...1784t0u/
2. No animal model suggests that birds use vision to recognize human faces, which makes it extremely unlikely!
3. If they can visually recognize the faces of humans, they are probably able to use their same highly developed visual acuity and specificity to recognize the facial features of the most physically attractive potential mates.
4. Retroactively, using a vague model of human visual recognition, even the explanation for conspecific sex identification via colorful plumage may fall by the way to favor face recognition in birds as an aspect of sexual attraction. Next we can discuss face recognition in both the birds and the bees!
5. We could then take comfort in claims that we are more like birds than we are like other mammals or insects that use olfactory acuity and specificity to sniff out the most reproductively fit mate.
6. But first
May 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
2) if animal models don't incorporate face recognition then maybe that's a problem with the model, not the birds!
Corvids might not have the same visual acuity as raptors, but it won't be very poor, especially in combination with UV vision, which might show us up in a different light, who knows?
3) Why would face recognition take precedence over plumage? It doesn't necessarily in humans when there are other parts of the anatomy on display! :)
May 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
6. But first we must ignore any neurophysiological link from olfaction to hormones and behavior in birds, bees, and mammals to then favor some unknown mechanism that links what they see to behavior.
7. Three cheers for the potential revival of the innate releasing mechanism, a dated, bird-brained concept if ever there was one neurophysiologically speaking, of course.
Re: study design. Studies of mammals show that once the response is conditioned by pheromones to occur, visual and or other sensory stimuli will elicit the same changes in hormones and behavior. The mask would not avoid the confound of conditioning. It is this conditioned response that many people fail to consider when they present results that are relatively meaningless if perception develops due to epigenetic effects of environmental stimuli on genetically predisposed behaviors (as has been recently suggested).
May 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Yes, there's nothing wrong with the article. No doubt, the researchers know full well how intelligent animals are. My problem was with whoever wrote the introduction.
May 17, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Maybe not, JVK, but the point would still be made or denied that it was the visual appearance of the face to the bird that was what determined who was perceived as the "enemy" and who the "friend".
May 17, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
I was thinking it should be possible to devise an objective method, that didn't depend on what anyone wanted the answer to be.
On the issue of pigeon navigation, I think they are flexible about that, because while it has been shown that smell is used when there are no convenient roads to follow, for example (as in the Italian experiment), it has also been noted that they tend to follow motorways for routine "commuting" when that happens to give a good, short route for them.
May 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
1. Mammalian social odors chemically act on olfactory receptors to elicit electrical activity in neurons.
2. The electrophysiological transduction of these social odors from chemical signals to electrical signals, allows them to effect gene expression.
3. Social odors effect gene expression in neurons of the brain that initiate the secretion of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH). The change in GnRH secretion is a hormone response that occurs in neurons of the mammalian brain. It is a neuroendocrine response.
The same neurophysiological mechanism is found in birds.
May 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet