Second computer worm 'hits Iran'
Iranians surf the internet at a cybercafe in central Tehran in January. Iran has been hit with new malicious software as part of cyber attacks against the country, a military officer told Mehr news agency on Monday without specifying the target.
Iran has been hit with new malicious software as part of cyber attacks against the country, a military officer told Mehr news agency on Monday without specifying the target.
"Certain characteristics about the 'Stars' virus have been identified, including that it is compatible with the (targeted) system," Gholam Reza Jalali, commander of the Iranian civil defence organisation, told the agency.
"In the initial stage, the damage is low and it is likely to be mistaken for governmental executable files," Jalali said, adding that Iranian experts were still investigating the full scope of the malware's abilities.
He did not say what kind of equipment the virus was targeting or when and how it had been spotted.
Tehran was hit with another computer worm, "Stuxnet," last year, reportedly designed to hurt the Islamic republic's controversial nuclear programme.
Iran has accused arch-foes Washington and Israel of launching Stuxnet, which was publicly identified last June and reportedly mutated and infected at least 30,000 computerised industrial equipment in the following months.
In December, Iran implicitly admitted its uranium enrichment plant in the central city of Natanz, which is regularly inspected by the UN nuclear watchdog, had been the victim of the worm.
Jalali urged the foreign ministry to take appropriate measures amid the ongoing "cyber attacks" against Iran, and said efforts to contain Stuxnet were still ongoing, Mehr reported.
"Confronting the Stuxnet virus does not mean that the threat has been fully removed, since viruses have a certain life span and it is possible that they continue their activity in a different form," he said.
Computer security firm Symantec said in November that Stuxnet might have been designed to disrupt the motors that power gas centrifuges used to enrich uranium -- the most controversial work of Tehran's nuclear programme.
Iran's atomic ambitions are at the heart of a conflict between Tehran and the West, which accuses the Islamic republic of seeking to develop a weapons capability under the guise of a civilian nuclear drive.
Tehran vehemently denies the charges.
(c) 2011 AFP
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
Need a rigid insulation material???
6 hours ago
-
magnets or EMF in car bumpers to protect from fender bender
23 hours ago
-
length of wire in a coil of known dimensions?
May 25, 2012
-
India Engineering Powerhouse
May 25, 2012
-
electromagnet core dereference between hard and soft iron
May 25, 2012
-
Measuring water pressure in an open tank
May 24, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Engineering
More news stories
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study
Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
3.6 / 5 (21) |
56
|
Delphi gasoline-injection engine technique rivals hybrid's edge
(Phys.org) -- Running a diesel like engine on gasoline is something Delphi is doing in notable fashion. They claim they are on to a promising way to enjoy an engine that gives the vehicle owner high efficiency ...
HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world
(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the companys ultimate vision, successfully producing ...
Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22
Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (11) |
18
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
Wake me up when they all go boom...
Silver out.
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (7)
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 4.6 / 5 (5)
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Not really of course, but you get the picture, it wouldn't take much to secretly build-up an arsenal of weapons right, and with today's political turmoil, now is the time to do, since the metaphorical dust is fogging everyone's vision.
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Only one country has ever done it secretly and that was Israel. It is in fact very difficult to do, and even more so to do so secretly. But that is beside the fact that Iran has already failed the secrecy test.
Also dont confuse our media's inability to see the forest for the trees with national intelligence services.
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (4)
Somebody is serious about screwing up Iran's plans. Their nuclear capabilities (or lack thereof) are a world-wide concern. This current attack doesn't necessarily have to have started in the west.
I would also like to have independent confirmation that this malware exists solely for the Iranians. Malicious Hacker buttholes speak many languages and wave many flags "doing it for teh Lulz."
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
First off, China only sent probes into EMAIL accounts, so there goes that philosophy, second, it was an inteligance gathering mission, not a shut down or re-routing of data, so the goes yet another one of those theories, next you'll be telling me that aliens hacked the program!
My information came from a report sent out from the DoD to the general public, from the white house, and more specifically, Politico.com.
Game, set, match.
Any questions?
Silver out.
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
From what Sophos are saying, it seems to have been carried by PDF or other document files as an attachment, so not too sophisticated an attack, Without an example of the payload it's too early to say who or what is responsible. As an additional note, I have to say that relying on the sources you cite as opposed to those who earn their living at the sharp end is not a good idea.
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (2)
But you are right, we do more than a little hacking ourselves, and do we admit officially that we do? Not even close. SOOOO, Kudos.
Any Questions?
Silver out.
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (2)
First of all, its called Stuxnet there's no "r". Secondly your statement of it being a military operation, especially one so organized, is a complete fabrication based on conjecture. Of course it wouldn't take much to convince you this was the US military, it took literally no evidence to convince you it was the US military before. People like you need to read more and share their opinions less, go polish your gun and make a new aluminum foil cap.
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Oh dear (deity of choice, or none), I've seen some silly responses, but that takes the biscuit.
You sir, are a fool.
Any questions?
Apr 25, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
I can only laugh out loud.
Are you a Red Army intel op? That would explain your position.
Apr 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Apr 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Apr 26, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Apr 26, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Free of historic knowledge, yes.
Apr 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Yes, the US is naught but a paranoid entity that is fast losing prestiege and power in comparison to some of its "allies" and "enemies", but it is not the ONLY one that is worried about Iran. If you look at NATO, it is made up of multiple countries, and for it to do anything, i.e. send a nuclear program watchdog, It needs to be voted on, and for all its pomp and circumstance, the US is still but one vote.
If i am so ignorant on the matters, please send an email containing relevant data on the matter to the email address listed on my profile page. Spam is not appreciated.
Any Questions?
Silver out.
Apr 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
sory im dumb
Apr 27, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Apr 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
You did though and speculations on that sort of thing really dont belong here on physorg.
No matter your intent (unfortunately i can't see one that does not involve some measure of racism) the comment is far from appropriate.
Apr 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Apr 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Not to bring up semantics, but "muslim" is not a "race"...
Apr 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Apr 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Any questions?
Silver out.
(P.S. look up the furry movement, just dont believe EVERYTHING you see on it. Some of the stuff is post-children age, if you catch my drift....)
Apr 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Apr 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Since there's no proof about who is doing this, any guess is really more of a probability estimate. With that in mind, I tend to agree that the US Government ranks high in the list of suspects. I am not so sure it would be the millitary though. The NSA or CIA would be a better fit.
However, it's cheap and easy to create a virus, so...
It could be college students in Iran or ouside Iran who's upset about the politics there. It could be a regional enemy State like the Saudi's. The motivation could even be somewhat personal or trade related, as in a bullying tactic or extortion. It could even be a random jokester who's studied in a nuclear physics lab and worked with that kind of equipment, and is messing with things he aught not be messing around with. The tinfoil hat people might even say it's credible that Symantic or McCaffee (ooohh or maybe Microsoft, sssshhhhh) created it. How about an anti-nuke enviro activist college professor? Any of those here?
Apr 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Israel and the US did it. It's no mystery. The head of Israeli security is a very, very dour man. When he responded to the news on Iran's equipment he was beaming like a father at his son's graduation. The US grabbed the delivery mechanism, an Iranian scientist, loaded up his equipment with the code and drop shipped him home unknowingly carrying a little surprise.
Apr 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Your theory is sound. The irony here is that whether we did exactly what you said or not, the perceived threat that we are capable of it is obvious around the world. If we did something like this to South Korea the world would never hear about it, so have we? I'm kinda surprised that the news was released from Iran. I mean, why let the culprits know they succeeded?
Apr 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
If you think we're a threat, imagine the cyber warfare potentials of China.
Apr 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
We did it.
Apr 30, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
I'm surprised that ALL millitary hardware doesn't have to be 100% designed and produced in the same country.
But I guess tenders get the cheapest price, and thus TROJAN chips will make their way in.
Apr 30, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Apr 30, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Simple answer, no. Slightly more complex answer, if they had, white-hats, and others, would have spotted it. I'm aware of the rumours about Huawei, and afaic, they are baseless. I'm not aware of any credible evidence to support the suggestion of h/w backdoors in chinese built network gear.
May 01, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Frajo thinks wars start when a military crosses a border. Technically Iran is experiencing a similar fate- it has been invaded digitally. What recourse does it have? It has an aging and top-heavy military which is becoming politically dangerous as did husseins right before he sent it against Kuwait, only to be obliterated in the desert. Conveniently for both he and the west. THIS is conspiracy.
May 01, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 02, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 02, 2011
Rank: not rated yet