Video: Could cancer be our oldest ancestor?

Mar 31, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Arizona State University researcher Paul Davies shares his theory about cancer being our evolutionary ancestor.
read more

Before the Cambrian flowering of multicellular life, there was a period of about a billion years where cells began to get together and form rudimentary colonies, says Davies, an astrobiologist who is one of two scientists proposing a theory that suggests are living fossils.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

"These rudimentary colonies, I think, were like the earliest tumors. So when people get now, these tumors represent a throwback to that time about a billion years ago – that first experimentation with multicellularity," Davies says.

Explore further: Micro fingers for arranging single cells

Related Stories

Conceptualizing cancer cells as ancient 'toolkit'

Feb 07, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Despite decades of research and billions of dollars, cancer remains a major killer, with an uncanny ability to evade both the body's defenses and medical intervention. Now an Arizona State ...

Astrobiology meets cancer research

Feb 08, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- In an interplanetary meeting of the minds, astrobiologists and oncologists have worked together to provide new insights into the origins of cancer, which remains a major killer despite the ...

Widening the search for extraterrestrial intelligence

Mar 01, 2010

"The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) has been dominated for its first half century by a hunt for unusual radio signals. But as he prepares for the publication of his new book The Eerie Silence: Are We Alone?," ...

Recommended for you

Micro fingers for arranging single cells

Apr 24, 2015

Functional analysis of a cell, which is the fundamental unit of life, is important for gaining new insights into medical and pharmaceutical fields. For efficiently studying cell functions, it is essential ...

Detailed structure of human ribosome revealed

Apr 24, 2015

A team at the Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC - CNRS/Université de Strasbourg/Inserm) has evidenced, at the atomic scale, the three-dimensional structure of the complete ...

How to kill a protein

Apr 24, 2015

For decades scientists have been looking closely at how our cells make proteins. But the inverse is equally important: how cells kill them.

How RNA machinery navigates our genomic obstacle course

Apr 24, 2015

Once upon a time, scientists thought RNA polymerase—the molecule that kicks off protein synthesis by transcribing DNA into RNA—worked like a wind-up toy: Set it down at a start site in our DNA and it ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Chibikiba
not rated yet Apr 01, 2011
Although this is an interesting concept and perhaps has some very mild amount of merit in very specific kinds of cancer I will point to the common occurrence of randomized aneuploidy in cancerous cells as an counter argument to the concept that cancer is somehow a regressed stable-state of multicellularity. There are also, in simplified form, three main accepted possibilities for the origin of multicellular colonies, none of which resemble the process of cancer development. This proposition seems quite like someone got the idea that because cancer often grows uncontrollably and with deadly disregard for any interests other than it's own propagation that perhaps, through natural selection, it is related to some viciously aggressive ancestor of multicellular organisms.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.