Protests, democracy not always good for women's rights

Mar 25, 2011 By Amy Patterson Neubert

Social movements, such as those currently gaining momentum in the Middle East and North Africa, can open the door for democracy, but that does not always benefit women's rights, says a Purdue University sociologist.

"We call this the democracy paradox because history shows that during some postprotest periods, women's can disappear or return to the status quo," says Valentine Moghadam, director of women's studies and a professor of sociology who is an expert in social change and movements in the Middle East and North Africa. "Unless women and women's groups are visible during the negotiations and invited to be part of the new leadership, a nation's new sense of freedom may not be shared by all."

Moghadam, who focuses on issues related to gender, is the author of "Modernizing Women: Gender and Social Change in the Middle East" and "Globalizing Women: Transnational Feminist Networks." She says women's rights experienced a setback when the Communist era ended in Eastern Europe. Before the revolution, women were guaranteed seats in parliament. When the communist governments collapsed, women were not supported as candidates in the new democratic elections, and the proportion of female officials declined from an average of 30 percent to lows of 4 percent.

"This is a fear in Tunisia where women have strong rights, and they are fighting to keep those rights," she says.

Women may lose out in some cases of political transition, but not always, Moghadam says. Women's groups and rights emerged stronger after revolutions in Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Morocco, South Africa and . Today the presidents of Brazil and Argentina are women, and there is a very high representation of Argentine women in the country's parliament. In Morocco, an 11-year campaign by women's rights groups for reform of the country's very discriminatory family law succeeded in 2003, resulting in greater rights for within families.

Moghadam also says that women's issues played a role that led to the chain of events sparking the protests in Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, Jordan, Iran and Libya. The 2002 Arab Human Development report included gender inequality as among the region's greatest problems.

"In general, people's grievances and frustration have been bubbling for the past decade because of the widening of social inequality, unemployment, persistence of poverty, suppression of any dissent and lack of social and economic justice," she says.

This build-up of frustration is fueling demonstrations and helps explain why protests are erupting in multiple areas, she says.

Explore further: Soccer's key role in helping migrants to adjust

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Google logo, maps mark International Women's Day

Mar 08, 2011

Google marked International Women's Day Tuesday by dedicating its logo to the 100th anniversary of the celebration of women's achievements and by giving Google Maps' icon Pegman a female sidekick -- Pegwoman.

Children aware of white male monopoly on White House

Oct 05, 2008

Challenging the idea that children live in a color or gender blind world, a new study from The University of Texas at Austin reveals most elementary-school-age children are aware there has been no female, African-American, ...

Recommended for you

Soccer's key role in helping migrants to adjust

2 hours ago

New research from the University of Adelaide has for the first time detailed the important role the sport of soccer has played in helping migrants to adjust to their new lives in Australia.

Congressional rift over environment influences public

Jul 31, 2014

American citizens are increasingly divided over the issue of environmental protection and seem to be taking their cue primarily from Congress, finds new research led by a Michigan State University scholar.

Decoding ethnic labels

Jul 30, 2014

If you are of Latin American descent, do you call yourself Chicano? Latino? Hispanic?

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Corban
not rated yet Mar 25, 2011
I see this as a differential equation. Representation in post-protest spots is a function of involvement both before and during the protests; risk your life more, get more kudos later. To make this causal relationship different for groups is discrimination and inequitable.

It would also be a disgrace to all the people who did risk their lives during the protests. Thus, to get the same they must do the same. I encourage the women and women's groups to not just be involved in the negotiations and leadership, but also in the catalysts beforehand.

Get involved in the riots!