Tampa airport runways renumbered due to magnetic north movement

Jan 10, 2011 by Lin Edwards report

(PhysOrg.com) -- The magnetic north pole is slowly moving, and the shift is affecting runways at airports in Tampa, Florida, with the major runway at Tampa International Airport closed until January 13th to allow for the signage to be changed and numeric designators at each end of the runway to be repainted.

The primary runway at the is designated 18R/36L, which means the runway is aligned along 180 degrees from north (that is, due south) when approached from the north and 360 degrees from north when approached from the south. Now the (FAA) has requested the designation be changed to 19R/1L to account for the movement of the magnetic . Similar changes are also taking place at the Peter O. Knight airport in Tampa. Later in the month Tampa International Airport’s east parallel and east-west runways will also be closed to allow their signage to be changed. Over 100 sign panels and 40 signs will need to be changed, along with painted signs on the runways.

The magnetic north pole is always slowly moving and is currently heading towards Russia from its current position in far northern Canada. The magnetic north pole moves by around 64 km (40 miles) a year because of changes within the Earth’s core (unlike the true north pole which moves very slowly due to tectonic plate movements). It has moved from extremes of around 10 degrees east in the late 16th century to 25 degrees west early in the 19th century, and is now at around 3 degrees west. The north and south magnetic poles can also switch places, and this last happened about 780,000 years ago.

According to FAA spokesman Paul Takemoto changes at other airports may not be required because magnetic fields vary from place to place. Takemoto said re-designation is rarely required. Such changes are not that unusual, however, with Stansted Airport in London having to do the same thing in 2009, redesignating its 3,000 meter runway 23/05 as 22/04. Stansted airport officials said they would have to renumber the runway again — in another 56 years or so.

Kathleen Bergen, also from the FAA, said runway designations were based on geomagnetic information, and that aviation uses information on latitude, longitude, and the magnetic poles. She said that the magnetic poles are constantly changing, and movements of more than three degrees can affect runway designations and numbering. In far northern areas, where the relative difference in location between true north and magnetic north has a greater effect, aviators tend to use true north as their reference instead of magnetic north.

Takemoto stressed the changes at the Tampa airports would have absolutely no effect on passenger safety.

Explore further: Mysterious source of ozone-depleting chemical baffles NASA

Related Stories

Ulysses Flyby of the Sun's North Pole

Jan 15, 2008

Consider it a case of exquisite timing. Just last week, solar physicists announced the beginning of a new solar cycle and now, Jan. 14th, the Ulysses spacecraft is flying over a key region of solar activity--the ...

New material is a breakthrough in magnetism

Apr 12, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers from Imperial College London have created a structure that acts like a single pole of a magnet, a feat that has evaded scientists for decades. The researchers say their new Nature Ph ...

Evidence of second fast north-south pole flip found

Sep 06, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- The Earth's magnetic poles flip around every 200,000 years or so, with north becoming south and vice versa. Normally, the process takes 4-5,000 years and it ought to be impossible for the ...

Lava flows reveal clues to magnetic field reversals

Sep 25, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- Ancient lava flows are guiding a better understanding of what generates and controls the Earth's magnetic field — and what may drive it to occasionally reverse direction.

Recommended for you

Canada to push Arctic claim in Europe

5 hours ago

Canada's top diplomat will discuss the Arctic with his Scandinavian counterparts in Denmark and Norway next week, it was announced Thursday, a trip that will raise suspicions in Russia.

Severe drought is causing the western US to rise

10 hours ago

The severe drought gripping the western United States in recent years is changing the landscape well beyond localized effects of water restrictions and browning lawns. Scientists at Scripps Institution of ...

A NASA satellite double-take at Hurricane Lowell

10 hours ago

Lowell is now a large hurricane in the Eastern Pacific and NASA's Aqua and Terra satellites double-teamed it to provide infrared and radar data to scientists. Lowell strengthened into a hurricane during the ...

User comments : 13

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rgwalther
4 / 5 (6) Jan 10, 2011
Just to be safe, I blame AGW, both George Bushs, Obama and Clinton. Oh yes, organized religion also.
gvgoebel
4.6 / 5 (10) Jan 10, 2011
Why rgw, surely you could have thought of many more people to blame? Alas, no matter how hard sane people try, we can never convincingly duplicate the madness of the truly crazy.
rgwalther
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 10, 2011
So many guilty, so little time.
Sean_W
1 / 5 (1) Jan 10, 2011
Why can't they just use the real directions and let the navigators compensate for their own compasses instead of repainting the numbers every time the drift gets too large? If it gets to a point where a plane has no GPS or computers capable of compensating for the compass then the plane is probably in an emergency situation and under the guidance of the tower long before they see the runway, right? Has anyone before these runway closures taken off and gotten confused and spent several hours flying in the wrong direction? I think there is a larger problem here than what is painted on the runway.
kevinrtrs
1.8 / 5 (13) Jan 10, 2011
The north and south magnetic poles can also switch places, and this last happened about 780,000 years ago.


So how does the magnetic pole alignment tie up with the pole reversal? Did the core swing around completely, doing a 180 degree movement first and then later on come back another 180 degrees?
If so, how long did that change take and how long did the field stay in that position? I do wish the researchers / reporters wouldn't just make a statement and leave the questions up in the air.

From volcanic lava flows, it would appear the reversal were very rapid, within a matter of weeks, not thousands of years.

Question that does remain on this item is how does magnetic field reversal tie up with magnetic field strength diminishing at such a rapid rate? I don't think it has anything to do with each other and that the field is diminishing in strength independently. And of course it has implications for origin of the earth since it cannot have lasted for 4.5By at this rate.
rgwalther
4.7 / 5 (12) Jan 10, 2011
The Poles were aligned with the USSR until that Empire deflated. The Poles then reversed that forced alignment and joined the EU.
PaulieMac
5 / 5 (8) Jan 10, 2011
@kevinrtrs

Even the most cursory glance around would have answered your questions...

From wikipedia:

:quote

A geomagnetic reversal is a change in the orientation of Earth's magnetic field such that the positions of magnetic north and magnetic south become interchanged. These events often involve an extended decline in field strength followed by a rapid recovery after the new orientation has been established...

:end quote

No slivers of evidence to be found here for a young earth, I'm afraid!
shavera
5 / 5 (3) Jan 10, 2011
@kevintrs, poles drift as well as flip. You're right that the flips are very rapid reversals of magnetic field. I don't know if the timescale is weeks or couple of years, but all very short geologically.

As for field strength, the field strength has varied considerably since the last reversal. Some times stronger some times weaker. I don't think that anyone's tied field strength to a flip.
ab3a
5 / 5 (2) Jan 10, 2011
Slow. News. Day.

Repainting runway numbers is not that uncommon as the magnetic north moves. The runway 36R and 36L had actually been aligned to 6.5 degrees north for some time. It should be relabeled runway 01R and 01L instead. Look up KTPA on Airnav.com and take a close look at the FAA's airport diagram...
Rohitasch
not rated yet Jan 10, 2011
Runways being fixed because the Poles change alignment. Hmmm! Deja vu anyone?
rgwalther
not rated yet Jan 11, 2011
Runways being fixed because the Poles change alignment. Hmmm! Deja vu anyone?

No, but it reminds me of something....?
houseofspears
5 / 5 (2) Jan 14, 2011
Geographic North is a Magnetic South pole and physicsorg.com should know that. TV getting this screwed up is ok but a physics site should understand that a compass needle that points north is a north pole and north poles are attracted to south. The magnetic south pole is what is moving and it is located in the north..
electrodynamic
not rated yet Jan 15, 2011
There was a short story about this some time ago nova or something. Anyway they can pretty much see a picture of the magnetic field around earth, and have computer simulations of what they think a shift will look like. And though they usually show a quick reversal there is a lot of other things going on during the simulation. For one thing there are multiple poles, more than one north or south pole. Another thing the article doesn't mention is the protection we get from the solar winds, and other cosmic radiation because of the earths magnetic envelope of protection. Protection that is lost when the field has more then one pole because the lost field strength of the overall circuit is spread out over many small magnetic circuits instead of one large one like it is now, giving you a large decrease in the size of the magnetic bubble or the degeneration of it all together. At the points where the magnetic fields enter the earth the Charged particles can find their way in etc.