Southwest headed for permanent drought

Jan 31, 2011 By David Funkhouser
Aerial view of Lake Powell in Arizona. The prominent white rings surrounding the edges of the cliffs are due to steadily receding water levels.

( -- The American Southwest has seen naturally induced dry spells throughout the past, but now human-induced global warming could push the region into a permanent drought in the coming decades, according to Lamont-Doherty scientist Richard Seager and others who have been studying the area’s climate.

Seager, who focuses on climate variability and climate change, began his work studying droughts by looking into the past using sea surface temperature records gathered by ships plying the oceans in the 19th century. He and colleagues used computer models to recreate a climate history that showed periodic droughts. Focusing on North America, they also used tree rings to look back as far as the Middle Ages, when the Southwest experienced a lasting hundreds of years.

“You begin to see that there’s a natural cycle of droughts, large and small,” says Seager, the Palisades Geophysical Institute/Lamont research professor at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. “But when you add in the human effects from rising greenhouse gases, we could be pushing subtropical regions like the American Southwest into a permanent state of aridity. There are signs it’s already underway.”

In a 2007 paper, Seager and colleagues used computer models to show the Southwest is on the verge of a transition to a more arid climate. And in the December 2010 issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Seager and Gabriel Vecchi of NOAA pinned the drying to a drop in winter precipitation and showed how this is caused by changes in atmospheric circulation and water vapor transports induced by warming temperatures.

The warming also shortens the snow season, reduces the snow mass that serves as natural storage for water, and forces an earlier spring melt, disrupting the supply system that waters much of the Southwest—the region from the western Great Plains to the Pacific, and the Oregon border to southern Mexico.

That is ominous news for a region that has seen explosive growth in population, land use and water demands in recent decades. A reduction in the flow of important water resources such as the Colorado River will have serious consequences.

“I’m curious how the Southwest is going to handle this,” Seager says.

He says the natural variations between wet and dry periods are driven mostly by the El Niño/La Niña cycle of sea surface warming and cooling in the Pacific. “The anthropogenic signal is currently small compared to the natural variability,” Seager says. “But you can see it, and it’s consistent with the climate models. It works across the whole subtropics. Right now the human effect is small, but it will become a serious problem in the decades down the road.”

Local water system managers want to know how much will be available in coming years, but Seager can’t offer information that detailed. Still, almost all of the models point to a much drier region by around 2050. “You could wait to the middle of the century and say, well, did this happen, or didn’t it happen?” Seager says. “But that’s not a very sensible thing to do.”

Explore further: New study confirms water vapor as global warming amplifier

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

'Killer' Southeast drought low on scale, says study

Oct 01, 2009

A 2005-2007 dry spell in the southeastern United States destroyed billions of dollars of crops, drained municipal reservoirs and sparked legal wars among a half-dozen states—but the havoc came not from exceptional ...

Climate is warming - despite 'ups and downs'

Dec 28, 2010

Periodic short-term cooling in global temperatures should not be misinterpreted as signalling an end to global warming, according to an Honorary Research Fellow with CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Barrie Hunt.

Abrupt climate shifts may move faster than thought

Dec 19, 2008

The United States could suffer the effects of abrupt climate changes within decades—sooner than some previously thought--says a new government report. It contends that seas could rise rapidly if melting of polar ice continues ...

Recommended for you

Huge waves measured for first time in Arctic Ocean

5 hours ago

As the climate warms and sea ice retreats, the North is changing. An ice-covered expanse now has a season of increasingly open water which is predicted to extend across the whole Arctic Ocean before the middle ...

New research reveals Pele is powerful, even in the sky

11 hours ago

One might assume that a tropical storm moving through volcanic smog (vog) would sweep up the tainted air and march on, unchanged. However, a recent study from atmospheric scientists at the University of Hawai'i ...

Image: Wildfires continue near Yellowknife, Canada

11 hours ago

The wildfires that have been plaguing the Northern Territories in Canada and have sent smoke drifting down to the Great Lakes in the U.S. continue on. NASA's Aqua satellite collected this natural-color image ...

Excavated ship traced to Colonial-era Philadelphia

13 hours ago

Four years ago this month, archeologists monitoring the excavation of the former World Trade Center site uncovered a ghostly surprise: the bones of an ancient sailing ship. Tree-ring scientists at Columbia ...

User comments : 9

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.7 / 5 (7) Jan 31, 2011
Too bad this global warming thing is bringing us more moisture than ever. Last winter the mountains in Tucson had over a 10 foot base of snow. Sounds like a drought for sure.
3.5 / 5 (6) Jan 31, 2011
Too bad this global warming thing is bringing us more moisture than ever. Last winter the mountains in Tucson had over a 10 foot base of snow. Sounds like a drought for sure.

You should probably learn what a drought is.

Beyond that, the Southwest was a desert before we irrigated it. This appears to be an article about water management, not desertification.
2.3 / 5 (9) Jan 31, 2011
This is backwards: ". . . now human-induced global warming could push . . ."

It seems to be more propaganda than science.

1. First establish that human-induced global warming exists.

2. Then speculate on all the possible consequences.
4.5 / 5 (2) Jan 31, 2011
Lake Powell is a reservoir damned by the Glen Canyon Dam, and so its level is controlled by other than natural forces. To use it's varying levels is disingenuous at best. I left the Sierra Club for its ineffectual response to the *proposal* to build the boondoggle that is Glen Canyon Damn. It was doomed to sedimentation ab initio.

Predicting rainfall so far in the future as a basis for investment is not appreciably different from predicting earthquakes at the same remove.
5 / 5 (2) Feb 01, 2011
Desertification is more a consequence of geology and not of climatology. The SW US is a desert because of the Sierra Nevada range. We're actually getting more snow fall in the last 3 years than we have before. Maybe it's due to the warmer temperatures over the Pacific.
1 / 5 (1) Feb 01, 2011
This appears to be an article about water management

Well, the study may have been about water management, but this article is about anthropogenic global warming causing human catastrophy.

You are right that there is more than one definition of a drought. Depending on what field you are working in, it could mean decreased precipitation or it could simply mean that people are using too much water, or a combo of both. Unfortunately, most people today have come to think that drought just means no rain, and the way this article is written supports that myth.

I actually read a study a couple months ago that was based on defining what a drought is. It cited numerous cases where the different variations of the term are used to abuse the systems for government aid and to avoid water control laws, as well as to make sensational headlines. They said that even amongst leading authorities, there are many different official definitions of "drought".
1 / 5 (1) Feb 01, 2011
Lake Powell is a reservoir damned by the Glen Canyon Dam, and so its level is controlled by other than natural forces. To use it's varying levels is disingenuous at best. I left the Sierra Club for its ineffectual response to the *proposal* to build the boondoggle that is Glen Canyon Damn. It was doomed to sedimentation ab initio

lol, yes. If you use lake level, then Cumberland Lake in Kentucky is in trouble (they drained it about half way down because of questions about the dam's safety).

On the good side, if you are right that the Glen Canyon Dam was a bad idea, then there's always the option to drain it and tear the dam down. Dams can be undone and I bet nature would return to that area VERY quickly. All that accumulated sediment would make PRIME growing soil. That would be a really interesting experiment. I wonder what would happen if they drained some of the dams here in South Carolina, and returned them to swampland. They mostly run those power plants on coal anyway.
1 / 5 (1) Feb 01, 2011
In the interest of proving my point about nature returning when you let water out of a dam, the forst around Cumberland lake has already grown back down to the new water level. It's kinda funny that the forest extended down to the water faster than some of the boat launches did. There's still docks and boat launches that don't reach the water now. I guess people figured that they would fill the lake back up by now.
3 / 5 (4) Feb 01, 2011
There is no justification for the predictions of drought and desertification. Those are the results of computer models and outright crystal ballery. We have as much reason to believe climate change will result in a greener, more verdant world, with longer growing seasons and more favorable plant conditions. The only reason why the alarmists bang their little bells about the desertification of the world is to create a hysteria. There is nothing these climate scientists can do about climate change; their efforts stem from social ideologies, not science.