WikiLeaks accuses 'cowardly' Amazon of lying

Dec 03, 2010 by Chris Lefkow
The Amazon homepage pictured in Washington in September 2010. WikiLeaks lashed out at Amazon on Friday for kicking the whistleblower website off its servers, accusing the US company of lying and being "cowardly."

WikiLeaks lashed out at Amazon on Friday for kicking the whistleblower website off its servers, accusing the US company of lying and being "cowardly."

The accusations came after Amazon broke days of silence and provided its first explanation for its decision to no longer provide Web-hosting services to .org.

Amazon Web Services, in a statement on its website, said it cut off WikiLeaks because it had violated the company's terms of service and not because of any government pressure.

WikiLeaks fired back at Amazon with a message on its Twitter feed. "Amazon's press release does not accord with the facts on public record. It is one thing to be cowardly. Another to lie about it," WikiLeaks said.

Amazon is best known as an online retailer but it is also a major provider of Web-hosting services, renting out space on its computer servers to customers around the world.

In its statement, the Seattle-based Amazon said "there have been reports that a government inquiry prompted us not to serve WikiLeaks any longer. That is inaccurate."

"There have also been reports that it was prompted by massive DDoS attacks," the company said in a reference to distributed denial of service attacks on the WikiLeaks website.

"That too is inaccurate," Amazon said. "There were indeed large-scale DDoS attacks, but they were successfully defended against."

DDoS attacks occur when legions of zombie computers, machines infected with viruses, are commanded to simultaneously visit a website.

Amazon said Amazon Web Services rents computer infrastructure on a self-service basis and does not pre-screen its customers.

"But it does have terms of service that must be followed," the company said. "WikiLeaks was not following them."

Amazon's terms state that customers must "control all of the rights to the content" stored on its servers and that the content "will not cause injury to any person or entity."

"It's clear that WikiLeaks doesn't own or otherwise control all the rights to this classified content," Amazon said.

A photo taken December 3 shows a page on the WikiLeaks website featuring its founder Julian Assange. WikiLeaks lashed out at Amazon on Friday for kicking the whistleblower website off its servers, accusing the US company of lying and being "cowardly."

"Further, it is not credible that the extraordinary volume of 250,000 classified documents that WikiLeaks is publishing could have been carefully redacted in such a way as to ensure that they weren't putting innocent people in jeopardy," the company said.

"Human rights organizations have in fact written to WikiLeaks asking them to exercise caution and not release the names or identities of human rights defenders who might be persecuted by their governments," it said.

Some of the data stored by customers on Amazon's servers is controversial "and that's perfectly fine," the company said.

"But when companies or people go about securing and storing large quantities of data that isn't rightfully theirs, and publishing this data without ensuring it won't injure others, it's a violation of our terms of service, and folks need to go operate elsewhere," Amazon said.

EveryDNS.net, the US firm that had been hosting the WikiLeaks.org domain name, pulled the plug on the website late Thursday, saying the cyberattacks were threatening its other clients.

WikiLeaks was offline for several hours but reappeared on Friday with a new Swiss domain name, WikiLeaks.ch.

Another US company, Tableau Software, cut off the whistleblower website on Wednesday citing a violation of its terms of service. Tableau Software was being used by WikiLeaks to create charts of its cache of secret US diplomatic cables.

Explore further: Ebola.com domain sold for big payout

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

WikiLeaks website kicked off Amazon's servers

Dec 01, 2010

(AP) -- Amazon.com Inc. forced WikiLeaks to stop using the U.S. company's computers to distribute embarrassing State Department communications and other documents, WikiLeaks said Wednesday.

WikiLeaks dropped by domain name provider

Dec 03, 2010

(AP) -- WikiLeaks' American domain name system provider, EveryDNS, has withdrawn service to the wikileaks.org name after the secret-spilling website once again became the target of hacker attacks.

WikiLeaks under new cyber attack: Twitter feed

Nov 30, 2010

WikiLeaks said in a Twitter message on Tuesday that it was under a new cyber attack after a similar incident at the weekend just before the website began releasing secret US diplomatic cables.

WikiLeaks to defy US demands on leaked cables

Nov 28, 2010

(AP) -- The online website WikiLeaks says it will go ahead with the release of hundreds of thousands of classified State Department documents in defiance of U.S. demands not to publish the files.

WikiLeaks switches to Swiss domain after attacks

Dec 03, 2010

(AP) -- WikiLeaks was forced Friday to switch over to a Swiss domain name, wikileaks.ch, after a new round of hacker attacks on its system prompted its American domain name provider to withdraw service.

Recommended for you

Ebola.com domain sold for big payout

21 hours ago

The owners of the website Ebola.com have scored a big payday with the outbreak of the epidemic, selling the domain for more than $200,000 in cash and stock.

Facebook goes retro with 'Rooms' chat app

Oct 23, 2014

Facebook on Thursday released an application that lets people create virtual "rooms" to chat about whatever they wish using any name they would like.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

IvyMike
3 / 5 (2) Dec 03, 2010
"You" don't "need" "quotation marks" around cowardly.
dirk_bruere
not rated yet Dec 03, 2010
I'm not buying anything from Amazon this Xmas as a protest. Cowards and liars.
Roland
5 / 5 (3) Dec 03, 2010
Much ado about nothing. WL only needed temporary hosting to get the files out. It got that. It will do this again. There's no way AWS can check its customers' files in advance. Stopping WL will be an exercise in frustration, and a bad idea anyway.