The greenest paper of them all

March 9, 2009 By Sandy Bauers

Wondering which paper towel or toilet paper is the greenest? The nonprofit advocacy group Greenpeace has released a pocket guide to paper products -- an updated version of the old National Resources Defense Council guide. The products also include facial tissues and paper napkins, although many people suggest ANY paper napkin is not a good thing. Use cloth until it's dirty, wash it with the rest of the clothes and skip the ironing.

Anyway, among the brands recommends are Green Forest, Natural Value, Seventh Generation, 365 and Trader Joe's. It suggests you avoid Kleenex Cottonelle, Charmin, Quilted Northern, Angel Soft and even Scott Naturals.

You can download the guide at .

Greenpeace uses three benchmarks in making its ratings. The recommended brands are made from 100 percent overall , a minimum of which is 50 percent post-consumer recycled content, and are not bleached with chlorine or toxic chlorine compounds.

The guide lists those recommended, those that "can do better" and those that should be avoided. With each brand, it lists the percentage of recycled content and specifies the bleaching process.

" that are made from recycled content help to reduce our impact on ancient forests, protecting and wildlife," said Greenpeace forest campaigner Lindsey Allen in a statement. "By using our guide and voting with their dollars, shoppers can help save endangered forests."

Critical among them is the Canadian Boreal, which provides nesting grounds for millions of songbirds. But it is being heavily logged, and Greenpeace contends many of the trees go straight into products.

Greenpeace has had a long-standing battle with Kimberly-Clark, the largest tissue product company in the world. Greenpeace gave an "avoid" rating to these Kimberly-Clark brands: Kleenex, Scott, Cottonelle and Viva.


(c) 2009, The Philadelphia Inquirer.
Visit Philadelphia Online, the Inquirer's World Wide Web site, at>

Explore further: Genetically modified rice could pose risks

Related Stories

Genetically modified rice could pose risks

June 14, 2005

BEIJING, June 14 (UPI) -- Greenpeace China has warned that experimental, genetically modified rice is being illegally sold in southern China, posing possible risks to consumers.Researchers from the environmental group collected ...

Greenpeace opposes Italian gas terminal

October 29, 2007

Environmental activists want to block Italian plans to install a floating natural gas terminal in the middle of a whale and dolphin sanctuary.

Greenpeace takes on tuna fishing

April 23, 2008

Greenpeace says it confronted a U.S. tuna boat in the South Pacific this week as part of an effort to fight overfishing by commercial fishing fleets.

Recommended for you

Climate scientist hits out at IPCC projections

October 13, 2015

As a new chairman is appointed to the Intergovernmental Panel on climate Change (IPCC) a University of Manchester climate expert has said headline projections from the organisation about future warming are 'wildly over optimistic.'

'Bridge' fuel may escalate atmospheric greenhouse gas

October 13, 2015

While the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) suggests there has been a decline in measurable atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel use in the U.S. for the past seven years, a Cornell scientist says ...

Study sees powerful winds carving away Antarctic snow

October 13, 2015

A new study has found that powerful winds are removing massive amounts of snow from parts of Antarctica, potentially boosting estimates of how much the continent might contribute to sea level. Up to now, scientists had thought ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (3) Mar 10, 2009
Greenpeas talk about toxic chemicals then push the use of "hybrids" so you can carry 100s of pounds of toxic chemicals (battery) around with were ever you go. That is until they need to dispose of it as toxic waste!
2.3 / 5 (3) Mar 10, 2009
Greenpeas talk about toxic chemicals then push the use of "hybrids" so you can carry 100s of pounds of toxic chemicals (battery) around with were ever you go. That is until they need to dispose of it as toxic waste!

Yes, how dare they! They should be using those green, citric-acid batteries, and physically peddling those vehicles up hills...what a bunch of whiners -:)

5 / 5 (1) Mar 10, 2009
Anyone else notice the hilarity in the fact that Greenpeace printed and distributed pamphlets about using "greener" paper products?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.