Scientists discover new planet orbiting dangerously close to giant star

November 18, 2008
The scientists used the Hobby-Eberly Telescope, one of the largest and most powerful telescopes in the world, to make its discovery of the extrasoslar planet. Credit: Thomas Sebring, Hobby-Eberly Telescope

A team of astronomers from Penn State and Nicolaus Copernicus University in Poland has discovered a new planet that is closely orbiting a red-giant star, HD 102272, which is much older than our own Sun. The planet has a mass that is nearly six times that of Jupiter, the largest planet in our solar system.

The team includes Alexander Wolszczan, the discoverer of the first planets ever found outside our solar system, who is an Evan Pugh Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics and the director of the Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds at Penn State; and Andrzej Niedzielski, who leads his collaborators in Poland. The team suspects that a second planet may be orbiting HD 102272, as well. The findings, which will be published in a future issue of The Astrophysical Journal, shed light on the ways in which aging stars can influence nearby planets.

Scientists already know that stars expand as they age and that they eventually may gobble up adjacent planets. In fact, scientists expect our own planet to be swallowed up by the Sun in about a billion years. But what scientists don't yet understand fully is how aging stars influence nearby planets before they are destroyed. The team's newly discovered planet is interesting because it is located closer to a red-giant star than any other known planet.

"When red-giant stars expand, they tend to eat up the nearby planets," said Wolszczan. "Although the planet we discovered conceivably could be closer to the star without being harmed by it, there appears to be a zone of avoidance around such stars. Our discovery pushes it back to about 0.6 astronomical units, which is the size of the new planet's orbit. It is important to find out why planets don't want to get any closer to stars, so one of our next steps is to try to figure out why this zone of avoidance exists and whether it occurs around all red-giant stars."

The team used the Hobby-Eberly Telescope of McDonald Observatory in south-western Texas to make its discovery. Through the telescope, which is equipped with a precise spectrograph, the scientists observed a pattern of alternating shifts of spectral lines in the light coming from the star, which is located 1,200 light-years from the Earth in the constellation Leo. These tiny, alternating shifts represent the fingerprint of a star that is moving alternately toward and away from Earth as it wobbles in space responding to the gravitational pull of an orbiting planet. Because of the Doppler effect, the light from the star becomes bluer as it moves toward the Earth and then redder as it recedes from it, which is reflected by the measured shifts of the spectral lines. The specific pattern of these shifts, which the research team observed, allowed the scientists to determine that one planet -- and possibly two planets -- orbit the star. If the second planet exists, the system would become the first multiplanet system discovered around a red-giant star.

Wolszczan said that he is particularly interested in applying to our own solar system the knowledge he gains about the effects of aging stars on planets orbiting other stars. "Our own Sun one day will become a red giant and it is interesting to think about what will happen to the outer planets of our solar system as the Sun expands," he said. "For example, Europa, one of Jupiter's moons, is covered by ice, but if it were to exist closer to the Sun, it might become a warm ocean world that could possibly support life."

Source: Penn State

Explore further: How strong is the force of gravity on Earth?

Related Stories

How strong is the force of gravity on Earth?

December 7, 2016

Gravity is a pretty awesome fundamental force. If it wasn't for the Earth's comfortable 1 g, which causes objects to fall towards the Earth at a speed of 9.8 m/s², we'd all float off into space. And without it, all us terrestrial ...

ALMA measures size of seeds of planets

December 5, 2016

Researchers using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), have for the first time, achieved a precise size measurement of small dust particles around a young star through radio-wave polarization. ALMA's high ...

Image: Linear dunes, Namib Sand Sea

December 9, 2016

An astronaut aboard the International Space Station (ISS) used a long lens to document what crews have termed one of the most spectacular features of the planet: the dunes of the Namib Sand Sea.

Recommended for you

Hubble catches a transformation in the Virgo constellation

December 9, 2016

The constellation of Virgo (The Virgin) is especially rich in galaxies, due in part to the presence of a massive and gravitationally-bound collection of over 1300 galaxies called the Virgo Cluster. One particular member of ...

Scientists sweep stodgy stature from Saturn's C ring

December 9, 2016

As a cosmic dust magnet, Saturn's C ring gives away its youth. Once thought formed in an older, primordial era, the ring may be but a mere babe – less than 100 million years old, according to Cornell-led astronomers in ...

Khatyrka meteorite found to have third quasicrystal

December 9, 2016

(Phys.org)—A small team of researchers from the U.S. and Italy has found evidence of a naturally formed quasicrystal in a sample obtained from the Khatyrka meteorite. In their paper published in the journal Scientific Reports, ...

10 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jeffsaunders
5 / 5 (4) Nov 18, 2008
Scientists discover new planet orbiting dangerously close to giant star


I had better read this article again. I cannot see anywhere where it says how lose the planet orbits the sun.

The team's newly discovered planet is interesting because it is located closer to a red-giant star than any other known planet.


ok we don't have an estimated distance just a relative distance of closer than any other one found so far. Just how close is that?
jonnyboy
4 / 5 (6) Nov 18, 2008
More importanyly, exactly how is this dangerous?

to who?

when?

another BS title
ofidiofile
not rated yet Nov 19, 2008
perhaps this is the distance?

"Although the planet we discovered conceivably could be closer to the star without being harmed by it, there appears to be a zone of avoidance around such stars of about 0.6 astronomical units".

though it's nothing more than implied here.

and "dangerously close"-- it made you read the article, didn't it? :)
Trippy
5 / 5 (1) Nov 19, 2008
DYOR - the original article isn't hard to find.

http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.1710
ofidiofile
not rated yet Nov 19, 2008
ah, cool. thanks!
axemaster
4 / 5 (1) Nov 19, 2008
So, the planet is at a semimajor axis of .62AU - wow that's actually insanely close for a red giant.
zevkirsh
5 / 5 (1) Nov 19, 2008
what if this planet is actually dangerously far away from the star becasue there are sentient pain feeling beings living on that planet that need a much warmer climate and they are actually far too cold right now?

the article might be titled ...dangerously far away.

Modernmystic
1 / 5 (1) Nov 26, 2008
I would think if it's a red giant and the planet is orbiting that close it could be getting some huge drag on the matter being sluffed off by the star in this phase...that's REALLY close.

I wouldn't be surprised if it's orbit doesn't degrade to the point where it spirals in within a few million years.
Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet Dec 04, 2008
Modernmystic:

Of course you won't be surprised. You won't be here to witness it!
Modernmystic
1 / 5 (1) Dec 04, 2008
Modernmystic:

Of course you won't be surprised. You won't be here to witness it!


Mmmmmkay...your right. Very clever.

*pats QC on the head and gives him a lollypop*

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.