Rise in atmospheric CO2 accelerates as economy grows, natural carbon sinks weaken

Oct 22, 2007

Human activities are releasing carbon dioxide faster than ever, while the natural processes that normally slow its build up in the atmosphere appear to be weakening. These conclusions are drawn in a new study in the early online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, October 22-26. The report states that “together, these effects characterize a carbon cycle that is generating stronger-than-expected climate forcing sooner than expected.”

Between 2000 to 2006, human activities such as burning fossil fuels, manufacturing cement, and tropical deforestation contributed an average of 4.1 billion metric tons of carbon to the atmosphere each year, yielding an annual growth rate for atmospheric carbon dioxide of 1.93 parts per million (ppm).

“This is the highest since the beginning of continuous monitoring in 1959,” states the report. The growth rate of atmospheric carbon dioxide is significantly larger than those for the 1980s and 1990s, which were 1.58 and 1.49 ppm per year, respectively. The present atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide is 381 ppm, the largest concentration in the last 650,000 years, and probably in the last 20 million years.

While the worldwide acceleration in carbon dioxide emissions had been previously noted, the current analysis provides insights into its causes. “The new twist here is the demonstration that weakening land and ocean sinks are contributing to the accelerating growth of atmospheric CO2,” says co-author Chris Field, director of the Carnegie Institution’s Department of Global Ecology.

Changes in wind patterns over the Southern Ocean resulting from human-induced global warming have brought carbon-rich water toward the surface, reducing the ocean’s ability to absorb excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. On land, where plant growth is the major mechanism for drawing carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, large droughts have reduced the uptake of carbon.

Emissions from the burning of fossil fuels constituted the largest source of anthropogenic carbon, releasing an average of 7.6 billion metric tons each year between 2000 and 2006, a significant jump from 6.5 billion tons in the 1990s. Emissions generated by land-use changes such as deforestation have remained constant, but shifted in geographic focus.

Source: Carnegie Institution

Explore further: Pact with devil? California farmers use oil firms' water

Related Stories

Why haven't Madagascar's famed lemurs been saved yet?

Jun 30, 2015

Lemurs are cute – there is no denying it. Their big eyes and fluffy faces mean they really are the poster animals of Madagascar, an island known internationally for its unique flora and fauna. But the plight ...

What is the habitable zone?

Jun 30, 2015

The weather in your hometown is downright uninhabitable. There's scorching heatwaves, annual tyhpoonic deluges, and snow deep enough to bury a corn silo.

China announces climate target for Paris deal

Jun 30, 2015

Top carbon polluter China confirmed it will try to cap its rising emissions before 2030 while the U.S. and Brazil pledged to boost renewable energy sources in a series of announcements Tuesday in anticipation ...

Recommended for you

Gimmicks and technology: California learns to save water

Jul 03, 2015

Billboards and TV commercials, living room visits, guess-your-water-use booths, and awards for water stinginess—a wealthy swath of Orange County that once had one of the worst records for water conservation ...

Cities, regions call for 'robust' world climate pact

Jul 03, 2015

Thousands of cities, provinces and states from around the world urged national governments on Thursday to deliver a "robust, binding, equitable and universal" planet-saving climate pact in December.

Will climate change put mussels off the menu?

Jul 03, 2015

Climate change models predict that sea temperatures will rise significantly, including in the tropics. In these areas, rainfall is also predicted to increase, reducing the salt concentration of the surface ...

As nations dither, cities pick up climate slack

Jul 02, 2015

Their national governments hamstrung by domestic politics, stretched budgets and diplomatic inertia, many cities and provinces have taken a leading role—driven by necessity—in efforts to arrest galloping ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

NotParker
3.7 / 5 (3) Oct 23, 2007
Facts:

1) The Southern Hempisphere is cooling and has been for 5 years
2) More sunshine is reaching the earth
3) CO2 is released by oceans when they warm up
Elenneth
4 / 5 (2) Oct 23, 2007
The capacity for a liquid to hold a dissolved gas (i.e. dissolved carbon dioxide in ocean water) decreases as the temperature of the liquid increases. For example, an opened can of soda at room temperature will loose its carbonation much faster than an opened can of soda in the refrigerator.

Therefore, the warmer the temperature of the ocean, the less of an ability it has to hold carbon dioxide and the greater its rate of dissolved carbon dioxide release. In this case, carbon-rich water, as it moves from a lower depth (read: cooler temperature) to a shallower depth (read: warmer temperature), it would make sense that it would release stored carbon dioxide.

I am not certain that I have heard of that statement that more sunshine is reaching the earth. From where do you draw this?
mikiwud
3.5 / 5 (2) Oct 25, 2007
If there are less clouds more heat reaches the Earth thus warming the oceans.The heating could be caused by thermal action from the Earth's core.As the greenhouse effect signature predicted by the computer models is not visible in the recorded data,this is more likley than AGW.
Elenneth
5 / 5 (1) Oct 25, 2007
Cloud coverage also serves as insulation to keep the heat in. That is why deserts, which are often devoid of cloud cover, can reach extreme daytime temperatures, while at night experience a drastic plummet in the temperature because of a lack of cloud cover to insulate against lost heat.
mikiwud
4 / 5 (2) Oct 26, 2007
Elenneth,
That is the local effect felt anywere it happens.
Globaly the effect is more cloud,less heat reaches the earth also more is reflected back into space and vice versa.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.