Rise in atmospheric CO2 accelerates as economy grows, natural carbon sinks weaken

October 22, 2007

Human activities are releasing carbon dioxide faster than ever, while the natural processes that normally slow its build up in the atmosphere appear to be weakening. These conclusions are drawn in a new study in the early online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, October 22-26. The report states that “together, these effects characterize a carbon cycle that is generating stronger-than-expected climate forcing sooner than expected.”

Between 2000 to 2006, human activities such as burning fossil fuels, manufacturing cement, and tropical deforestation contributed an average of 4.1 billion metric tons of carbon to the atmosphere each year, yielding an annual growth rate for atmospheric carbon dioxide of 1.93 parts per million (ppm).

“This is the highest since the beginning of continuous monitoring in 1959,” states the report. The growth rate of atmospheric carbon dioxide is significantly larger than those for the 1980s and 1990s, which were 1.58 and 1.49 ppm per year, respectively. The present atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide is 381 ppm, the largest concentration in the last 650,000 years, and probably in the last 20 million years.

While the worldwide acceleration in carbon dioxide emissions had been previously noted, the current analysis provides insights into its causes. “The new twist here is the demonstration that weakening land and ocean sinks are contributing to the accelerating growth of atmospheric CO2,” says co-author Chris Field, director of the Carnegie Institution’s Department of Global Ecology.

Changes in wind patterns over the Southern Ocean resulting from human-induced global warming have brought carbon-rich water toward the surface, reducing the ocean’s ability to absorb excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. On land, where plant growth is the major mechanism for drawing carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, large droughts have reduced the uptake of carbon.

Emissions from the burning of fossil fuels constituted the largest source of anthropogenic carbon, releasing an average of 7.6 billion metric tons each year between 2000 and 2006, a significant jump from 6.5 billion tons in the 1990s. Emissions generated by land-use changes such as deforestation have remained constant, but shifted in geographic focus.

Source: Carnegie Institution

Explore further: Intensity of desert storms may affect ocean phytoplankton

Related Stories

Intensity of desert storms may affect ocean phytoplankton

August 27, 2015

Each spring, powerful dust storms in the deserts of Mongolia and northern China send thick clouds of particles into the atmosphere. Eastward winds sweep these particles as far as the Pacific, where dust ultimately settles ...

Saving Louisiana's coast

August 27, 2015

It was Day Nine after Katrina struck in 2005 when Sarah Mack's bosses at the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans called her back to work.

Earth's extremes point the way to extraterrestrial life

August 26, 2015

Bizarre creatures that go years without water. Others that can survive the vacuum of open space. Some of the most unusual organisms found on Earth provide insights for Washington State University planetary scientist Dirk ...

China, US seek 'clean coal' agreement as industry struggles

August 25, 2015

U.S. and China officials took a major step Tuesday toward an agreement to advance "clean coal" technologies that purport to reduce the fuel's contribution to climate change—and could offer a potential lifeline for an industry ...

Porous material converts CO2 into carbon monoxide and oxygen

August 21, 2015

(Phys.org)—A team of researchers with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the University of California has developed a porous material that is able to split carbon dioxide molecules into carbon monoxide and oxygen. ...

Recommended for you

New study sheds light on end of Snowball Earth period

August 24, 2015

The second ice age during the Cryogenian period was not followed by the sudden and chaotic melting-back of the ice as previously thought, but ended with regular advances and retreats of the ice, according to research published ...

Earth's mineralogy unique in the cosmos

August 26, 2015

New research from a team led by Carnegie's Robert Hazen predicts that Earth has more than 1,500 undiscovered minerals and that the exact mineral diversity of our planet is unique and could not be duplicated anywhere in the ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

NotParker
3.7 / 5 (3) Oct 23, 2007
Facts:

1) The Southern Hempisphere is cooling and has been for 5 years
2) More sunshine is reaching the earth
3) CO2 is released by oceans when they warm up
Elenneth
4 / 5 (2) Oct 23, 2007
The capacity for a liquid to hold a dissolved gas (i.e. dissolved carbon dioxide in ocean water) decreases as the temperature of the liquid increases. For example, an opened can of soda at room temperature will loose its carbonation much faster than an opened can of soda in the refrigerator.

Therefore, the warmer the temperature of the ocean, the less of an ability it has to hold carbon dioxide and the greater its rate of dissolved carbon dioxide release. In this case, carbon-rich water, as it moves from a lower depth (read: cooler temperature) to a shallower depth (read: warmer temperature), it would make sense that it would release stored carbon dioxide.

I am not certain that I have heard of that statement that more sunshine is reaching the earth. From where do you draw this?
mikiwud
3.5 / 5 (2) Oct 25, 2007
If there are less clouds more heat reaches the Earth thus warming the oceans.The heating could be caused by thermal action from the Earth's core.As the greenhouse effect signature predicted by the computer models is not visible in the recorded data,this is more likley than AGW.
Elenneth
5 / 5 (1) Oct 25, 2007
Cloud coverage also serves as insulation to keep the heat in. That is why deserts, which are often devoid of cloud cover, can reach extreme daytime temperatures, while at night experience a drastic plummet in the temperature because of a lack of cloud cover to insulate against lost heat.
mikiwud
4 / 5 (2) Oct 26, 2007
Elenneth,
That is the local effect felt anywere it happens.
Globaly the effect is more cloud,less heat reaches the earth also more is reflected back into space and vice versa.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.