This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
reputable news agency
proofread
Air regulators roll back rule that let major Southern California polluters avoid millions in fees
Southern California air regulators have voted to impose millions of dollars in fees on the region's heaviest polluters, undoing a controversial program that made major sources immune from penalties.
Southern California does not meet federal clean air standards, so under U.S. law its large polluters are required to reduce their emissions by 20%. If they don't achieve those reductions, they must pay fees comparable to their emissions. The money is meant to be spent on clean air investments in the region.
For years, however, the South Coast Air Quality Management District used a controversial accounting rule it enacted in 2011 to shield polluters from having to pay. The rule allowed the agency to forgive the pollution fees if the air district dedicated a dollar-for-dollar match toward emission reduction initiatives.
Over the last decade, the air district could have collected more than $200 million in pollution fees from Southern California's largest polluters, according to government records obtained by Earthjustice, an environmental law nonprofit headquartered in San Francisco.
Last year, Earthjustice and other environmental groups petitioned the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to intervene and require the air district to revise its pollution fee program, arguing this loophole has removed the impetus for these facilities to curb their emissions.
The pollution fees will affect about 320 facilities, including oil refineries.
At a recent meeting, air district staff said that if the agency didn't collect pollution fees, as mandated by federal law, the U.S. EPA would collect the fees and those funds would go into the federal treasury.
But critics noted that the fees might pose a financial burden for regional hospitals, wastewater treatment facilities and other essential operations that may have to pay them.
The rule "will not improve our air quality in a significant way," said Brad Bowman, who expressed concern for the fiberglass-manufacturing business where he works. "You will not solve our non-attainment problem and will hurt our already struggling California economy."
Jane Williams, executive director of California Communities Against Toxics, said the action was long overdue.
"It's laudable that we will be finally going to be complying with federal law," she said.
2024 Los Angeles Times. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
