This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

preprint

trusted source

proofread

T. rex not as smart as previously claimed, scientists find

T. rex: About as smart as your average crocodile
Estimated relative size of the telencephalon (excluding olfactory bulb and tracts) and cerebellum in T. rex. (a): The log-transformed mass of the telencephalon in extant non-telluravian birds and non-avian sauropsids is plotted as a function of the mass of the rest of the brain (total brain—telencephalon—cerebellum volume). Green dots show the maximum, mid and minimum estimates for the mass of the T. rex telencephalon The orange dotted line represents the regression line for non-telluravian bird species obtained from PGLS while the pink one represents the same for non-avian sauropsids. (b): Analogous plot to (a), but for the cerebellum. Credit: The Anatomical Record (2024). DOI: 10.1002/ar.25459

An international team of scientists including two neurobiologists from the University of Alberta is weighing in on the latest controversy over the brain power of Tyrannosaurus rex.

Dinosaurs have been extinct for more than 60 million years, but they can still cause a bit of a ruckus. It was as though an asteroid hit the world of dinosaur research in 2023 when prominent neuroscientist Suzana Herculano-Houzel of Vanderbilt University claimed that dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus rex were far more intelligent than had been believed.

In an article in the Journal of Comparative Neurology, she argued that T. rex had an exceptionally high number of neurons, the cells that carry and send information in the brain. In fact, Herculano-Houzel said there were so many neurons in the brain of a theropod such as T. rex that it may have been as smart as a baboon and capable of cultural transmission of knowledge and tool use.

It was a provocative study that was immediately greeted with skepticism in the scientific community. And now an international team of paleontologists, neuroanatomists and cognitive psychologists has conducted a new study, published in the journal The Anatomical Record, that refutes Herculano-Houzel's claims.

Cristian Gutierrez-Ibanez, a research associate in the University of Alberta's Department of Biological Sciences, was one of the leaders of this new study debunking the notion that the T. rex was as smart as a baboon.

"There were a lot of people who thought the record needed to be set straight," he says. "Particularly because it did make it into the press. You end up with this popular idea that T. rex was super smart and could use tools and have culture and you go, 'Whoa!'"

An academic firestorm

Herculano-Houzel had touched off an academic firestorm, and lots of scientists wanted to respond. Gutierrez-Ibanez says a group of scientists eventually decided to combine their efforts and author a single paper to refute her findings. "We said there is no point in eight different things being written to say this is wrong. Why don't we just put them all together?"

It was a project unlike anything he had been a part of, with academics from a range of disciplines working together. Doug Wylie, a professor in the U of A's Department of Biological Sciences, says a project like that can be a challenge, with a lot of cooks in the kitchen. But thankfully, a couple of people took control of the process. Wylie credits Gutierrez-Ibanez for being one of them, particularly in the analysis of data.

The team examined the techniques that Herculano-Houzel used to estimate dinosaurs' brain size and number of neurons in their brains, and found that her assumptions were unreliable. Despite the temptation to think of them as big birds, dinosaurs were reptiles, and reptile brains are far different from those of mammals and birds.

For one thing, they don't fill up the skull cavity. There is a lot of cerebrospinal fluid taking up space as well. "The first time I dissected an alligator brain, I took the top of the skull off and I went, 'Where is the brain?'" says Wylie. "Because there is this big space in there."

Then there is the animal size factor. An adult male baboon can range from 14 to 40 kilograms. A T. rex could be in the neighborhood of 7 tons. According to Gutierrez-Ibanez, the number of neurons scales with the body size.

"We don't know why it's true, but it is true. A larger animal needs more neurons." That means T. rex needed a lot of neurons for just doing the basics with such a large body, with none left over for using tools and transmitting cultural knowledge.

Reptile brains are also packed more loosely with neurons than the brains of mammals and birds. "She's focused on the neuron number, and they are too high anyway," Wylie says of Herculano-Houzel's study.

And reptiles don't have the same kinds of connections and circuits in their brains that mammals and birds have. Gutierrez-Ibanez says that would limit the complexity of their social behaviors.

So, T. rex was probably only about as smart as a crocodile, not a baboon, the team concludes. That was likely a very good thing for the animals being hunted by T. rex. But it doesn't mean the theropod didn't have a decent reptile brain. After all, they were also able to dominate the world for millions of years, which is no mean feat.

We are not dissing T. rex," Gutierrez-Ibanez says. "We are just saying that claiming T. rex had the intelligence of a baboon and culture might be taking it too far.

More information: How smart was T. rex? Testing claims of exceptional cognition in dinosaurs and the application of neuron count estimates in palaeontological research', The Anatomical Record (2024). anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wile … doi/10.1002/ar.25459

On bioRxiv: DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.10.575006

Journal information: bioRxiv

Citation: T. rex not as smart as previously claimed, scientists find (2024, April 29) retrieved 14 June 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2024-04-rex-smart-previously-scientists.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Phylogenetic bracketing suggests some dinosaurs' neuron density was equal to that of modern primates

511 shares

Feedback to editors