This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

In search of Planet 9: An unconventional detection approach

In search of Planet 9
The colored lines indicate the predicted temperature T of the satellite for different values of orbital eccentricity (es = 0.1, es = 0.5 and es = 0.9). Here, we have neglected the solar heating effect and we have assumed R = 100 km. Credit: arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2301.13471

There is a mystery in our solar system surrounding the orbits of Kuiper belt objects. More than one trillion icy objects smaller than our moon orbit the sun in a donut-shaped ring beyond Neptune. Oddly, a cluster of outer Kuiper belt objects all ellipse in a similar way, as though being gravitationally pulled in one direction. The leading hypothesis is that an unseen object, five to 10 times the mass of Earth, is causing the pulling effect. The mystery object has been dubbed Planet 9.

Observations have yet to discover the source of this gravity from the usual optical, microwave, infrared or electromagnetic wave spectrums, leading to speculation that it could be a rogue planet core, a , or even a cluster of dark matter. Any of these would make the object extremely difficult, if not impossible, to detect.

An unconventional detection approach has been proposed by Man Ho Chan, associate professor in the Department of Science and Environmental Studies at The Education University of Hong Kong. In his paper "What if planet 9 has satellites?" which has been accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal, Chan focuses on the potential existence of satellites orbiting Planet 9.

While looking for moons around a planet that hasn't been found might initially sound like a more difficult task than finding the planet itself, Chan illustrates that if Planet 9 has objects, those objects would have fluctuating heat signatures as they due to the process of tidal heating. These heat signatures would be 2.5 times higher than the expected range for Planet 9 itself, and would also be much higher than any known Kuiper belt objects. Signatures in this range should be detectable by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Observatory (ALMA), which has recently undergone a capability upgrade.

It is known that objects within the Kuiper belt can have satellites. Pluto, the smaller than our moon and former ninth planet in our , is within the Kuiper belt and has five moons.

Is there really a Planet 9?

Astronomers Mike Brown and Konstantin Batygin of the California Institute of Technology, after initially attempting to prove that no such planet was required, have given the strange outer orbits a .02% to .04% chance of naturally occurring without a Planet 9 type body affecting their orbit. Despite initial skepticism, in 2016, they published a paper in the Astrophysical Journal titled "Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System," and have since narrowed down the mass and potential orbital locations of Planet 9.

According to Chan, the CalTech astronomers' proposed mass for Planet 9 could accommodate as many as 20 satellites, increasing its chances of observable tidal force heat signatures.

Why haven't we already found it?

If it is a rogue planet or a remnant planetary core, having survived an early solar system game of planetary billiard balls, it could have an eccentric orbit. As good as we are at spotting things far away, those objects tend to be trackable over time because orbits are mostly on the same plane and moving in the same direction around the sun. An orbit not on that plane and going in a different direction, regardless of size, would be exceedingly hard to track.

If a black hole is causing the pull, one measured in Earth masses and not the usual solar masses, it would be small enough to fit nicely into an elementary school backpack. This makes and gamma-ray emissions too faint to register and would require an expansion of the standard model to accommodate its existence.

And is so named precisely because it has avoided all methods of detection except gravitational influence on much larger scales.

Yet any of these possible objects could support satellites. Thanks to Chan's work, we now have a good strategy for finding them. Since there are no other astrophysical mechanisms past Neptune that could increase temperatures to the ranges detailed in his paper, the satellites should stand out against the colder background and offer a clear signal that Planet 9, no matter how dark, is out there.

More information: Man Ho Chan, What if planet 9 has satellites?, arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2301.13471

Journal information: Astrophysical Journal , arXiv

© 2023 Science X Network

Citation: In search of Planet 9: An unconventional detection approach (2023, February 22) retrieved 24 May 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2023-02-planet-unconventional-approach.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

If Planet 9 is out there, here's where to look

257 shares

Feedback to editors