This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:



Exploring how substantially larger brains evolved in humans

How could we evolve such a huge brain?
A BaYaka boy climbs a tree to forage for food. Credit: Karline Janmaat

A new study, published in the journal Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, investigated the foraging behavior of children in a present-day forager society. Already from an early age, there was a gender-specific development of foraging skills. These new findings, combined with the high level of food sharing in forager societies, support the embodied capital theory, offering an explanation for the substantially larger brains in humans.

Foraging skills could have provided humans with a more stable energy and nutrient supply, which may ultimately have enabled large resource investments into the brain. The research was led by the University of Amsterdam (UvA), the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), and the Friedrich Schiller University Jena.

Humans have brains three times the size of other primate species. A diverse, high-quality diet and a prolonged childhood with sufficient time to learn complex food acquisition skills are thought to be important evolutionary drivers of our large brains. In contrast to the diet of other primates, the human diet is characterized by a diverse variety of high-quality and difficult-to-acquire foods, such as meat and fish, as well as tubers or many species of nuts and caterpillars. To collect these, complex skills are needed that are thought to be developed from an early age.

To better understand how humans learn these foraging skills, the international research team accompanied 27 children of a modern forager society, the BaYaka, in the Republic of the Congo for one year. The children start foraging independently in peer groups from as young as five years old. The researchers investigated the children's foraging methods, dietary composition, and botanical knowledge on their daily food-finding trips. Besides observing the behavior, they also conducted nutritional analyses of the collected food.

To achieve this, the researchers set up an interdisciplinary collaboration between a botanist and cognitive behavioral ecologists from the University of Leiden and Amsterdam, chemical ecologists from iDiv, the University of Jena, and UFZ, anthropologists from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig and nutritional ecologist from the Charles Perkins Centre from the University of Sydney. The fieldwork resulted in a unique dataset containing 798 hours of observational data.

The BaYaka children spent one-third of their time searching and acquiring food. Half of that time, they searched independently from adults and showed a high level of autonomy. "I was impressed to see how skilled the children were already at a very young age," says Jorin Veen, first author of the paper, who performed this study for his Master thesis at the UvA. "The largest share of the food were fallen fruits, seeds, and tubers, but the children also climbed 40 meters high trees to collect honey or fruits, which can be a risky endeavor."

Differences between boys and girls

The results revealed an early onset in the specialization in foraging skills. Foraging groups with more boys were more likely to eat fruits and seeds, which often requires risky climbing skills. Girls were more likely to collect tubers than boys. "Collecting tubers requires exceptional digging skills, as the lianas that lead to tubers are not easy to recognize and keep track off," explains Prof Karline Janmaat, supervisor of the lead author and researcher at the Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics at the UvA.

"This of a gendered-based specialization of foraging , combined with the high level of food sharing in forager societies, likely enabled the human species to have a more stable energy and nutrient supply—a supply that could have ultimately enabled us to afford a substantially larger brain than our closest living relatives."

"Our analyses revealed that especially the fruits, which made up 40 percent of the children's diet, contained more sugars, especially glucose and fructose, compared to other plant items," says co-author Prof Nicole van Dam. "No wonder that they put so much effort into obtaining them." Van Dam, who led the molecular analyses, headed the Molecular Interaction Ecology group at iDiv and the University of Jena until 2022, when she became the director of the Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ) in Grossbeeren.

More information: Jorin Veen et al, Development of embodied capital: Diet composition, foraging skills, and botanical knowledge of forager children in the Congo Basin, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (2023). DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2023.935987

Provided by German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research

Citation: Exploring how substantially larger brains evolved in humans (2023, February 9) retrieved 2 December 2023 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Testing the theory that human's long developmental period is due to difficulty in learning complex foraging skills


Feedback to editors