Plasticine models may underestimate predation bias

Plasticine models may underestimate predation bias
Various invertebrates observed on live mealworms (Tenebrio molitor) deployed in a monsoonal tropical rainforest of south-eastern China: (A) ant, (B) dermapteran, (C) platyhelminth, (D) centipede (also a fly), (E) opilionid, (F) beetle, (G) land snail, and (H) spider. Credit: Thilina S. Nimalrathna

Predation (including parasitism) is an ecological process through which biodiversity is shaped and maintained. Sentinel plasticine prey has been increasingly used to estimate predation pressure. However, the use of plasticine caterpillars may bias the estimation of predation pressure, as the method is designed for visually oriented predators.

In a study published in Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, the potential estimation bias caused by the use of plasticine models was evaluated by a team of young researchers who have received training at the Advanced Field Course in Ecology and Conservation—Xishuangbanna (AFEC-X).

The researchers compared predator attack rates between real —dead and live mealworms (Tenebrio molitor L.) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)—and plasticine models in a monsoonal tropical rainforest of south-eastern China.

They found higher invertebrate predation on mealworms than on plasticine caterpillars, which suggest the possibility of underestimated predation intensity by invertebrates using plasticine caterpillars. Plasticine models, irrespective of their shapes, may attract and perhaps nonpredators, potentially undermining the assumption that predators distinguish the shapes of plasticine models and attack only caterpillar-shaped models.

The researchers then assessed the generality of the premise that predators distinguish the shapes and preferentially attack plasticine caterpillars over plasticine models in different shapes. The results showed that the attack rates on models of different shapes depend on predator composition of a particular locality at a given time.

Plasticine models may underestimate predation bias
Bite and scar imprint likely left by (A, B) ants, (C, D) non-ant invertebrates, and (E, F) vertebrates (rodents) on plasticine (A, C, E) caterpillars and (B, D, F) cubes deployed in a monsoonal tropical rainforest of south-eastern China. Credit: Thilina S. Nimalrathna

Furthermore, the use of dead prey is likely to attract non-predatory scavengers, but the use of live prey is not an unbiased method to estimate pressure either. Nevertheless, live prey will attract predators that otherwise cannot be detected using conventional plasticine models.

"In light of the results of our study, we suggest that, whenever possible, plasticine experiments should be 'calibrated' by employing other methods (e.g., using real live prey), so that the discrepancies between predators that attack plasticine caterpillars and those that do not could be estimated," said Akihiro Nakamura of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG).

More information: Thilina S. Nimalrathna et al, Estimating predation pressure in ecological studies: controlling bias imposed by using sentinel plasticine prey, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata (2022). DOI: 10.1111/eea.13249

Citation: Plasticine models may underestimate predation bias (2022, October 28) retrieved 23 July 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2022-10-plasticine-underestimate-predation-bias.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Fake caterpillar study reveals global pattern in predation

17 shares

Feedback to editors