Australians urged to consider environment as well as health when reaching for sweets and pastries

Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

Keen to do your bit for the environment? Cut back on sweets, pastries, fried foods and processed meat. According to a new study published this month, reducing these foods in our diet is not only better for our health but also the planet.

Australia and New Zealand households eat more discretionary and junk foods than recommended by dietary guidelines, contributing to -related greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe) and other environmental impacts.

University of South Australia (UniSA) dietitian Sara Forbes, who led a review examining 20 studies on the environmental impacts of food consumption in both countries, says the findings highlight the need for more sustainable dietary choices.

According to a Federal Government report released in 2020, Australia emitted an estimated 510 metric tons of carbon dioxide, with food-related emissions accounting for 14.2 percent of this total. The report found that the average Australian produces the equivalent of 19.7kg of carbon dioxide each day via their diets.

Another report from 2017 found that comprises approximately six percent of Australia's GHGe, considering the water, energy and pesticides used in food production and packaging that ends up in landfill, where it releases even more methane as it decomposes.

Unlike New Zealand, current Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADG) do not consider environmental impacts of food and need to be updated, researchers say.

These core foods are estimated to contribute between 67–73 percent of total food-related GHGe in Australia, with meat, grains and dairy contributing the most emissions. Fruit and vegetables are two of the lowest contributors.

Non-core or 'discretionary' foods include sugar-sweetened drinks, alcohol, confectionary and processed meats, accounting for between 27–33 percent of food-related GHGe. While the percentage is lower than core food emissions, the fact that Australians are consuming large amounts of avoidable energy-rich, nutrient-poor foods is not helping the environment.

In New Zealand, the highest greenhouse gas emitters are meat, seafood and eggs (35 percent), followed by highly processed foods such as pastries and ice cream (34 percent).

Other studies examined the environmental impacts of water use in food production.

Australian irrigators soak up eight million megalitres of water each year to grow crops, but the majority are exported, making it difficult to accurately reflect the nation's water footprint.

The researchers assessed 20 articles in their study, published in the past decade, with varying findings. Despite the differences, clear trends emerged.

"Discretionary foods have a higher cropland, water scarcity and Ecological Footprint. Meat also emits greenhouse gases, although its water scarcity footprint is lower compared to dairy products, cereals, grains, fruit and vegetables," Forbes says.

"It is time we better acknowledged the environmental impacts of the type and amount of food we eat, considering the planet as well as our health.

"By 2050, the world's population is projected to reach 10 billion people. There is no way we can feed that amount of people unless we change the way we eat and produce food."

Worldwide, food consumption and production account for one quarter of total global emissions. Half of the world's habitable land is used for agriculture which has led to a 60 percent biodiversity loss. Furthermore, an estimated two thirds of the world's freshwater is used for irrigation.

More information: Sara Forbes et al, A Rapid Review of the Environmental Impacts Associated with Food Consumption in Australia and New Zealand, Current Nutrition Reports (2021). DOI: 10.1007/s13668-021-00374-0

Citation: Australians urged to consider environment as well as health when reaching for sweets and pastries (2021, November 5) retrieved 16 April 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Three ways to reduce the carbon footprint of food purchased by US households


Feedback to editors