Extreme solar storms may be more frequent than previously thought

Extreme solar storms may be more frequent than previously thought
This visualization depicts what a coronal mass ejection might look like like as it interacts with the interplanetary medium and magnetic forces. Credit: NASA / Steele Hill

Researchers propose in a new study why an extreme solar storm in 1859 was so damaging to Earth's magnetic field. They compared the storm with other extreme storms in history, suggesting this storm is not likely unique.

The September 1859 Carrington Event ejected concentrated solar plasma towards Earth, disrupting the planet's magnetic field and leading to widespread telegraph disturbances and even sporadic fires. New research in AGU's journal Space Weather indicates storms like the Carrington Event are not as rare as scientists thought and could happen every few decades, seriously damaging modern communication and navigation systems around the globe.

"The Carrington Event was considered to be the for space weather events against the modern civilization… but if it comes several times a century, we have to reconsider how to prepare against and mitigate that kind of space weather hazard," said Hisashi Hayakawa, lead author of the new study and an astrophysicist at Osaka University in Osaka, Japan and Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in the United Kingdom.

The Carrington Event is one of the most extreme solar storms observed in the last two centuries and was caused by a large coronal mass ejection, an emission of plasma from the sun's outmost atmosphere. Depending on a coronal mass ejection's strength and trajectory, it can significantly distort Earth's magnetic field, causing an intense magnetic , global auroras and damaging any technology that relies on electromagnetic waves.

Scientists previously thought events like the Carrington Event were very rare, happening maybe once a century. They knew the Carrington Event caused low-latitude auroras and failure of telegraph equipment throughout the globe, but they had mostly studied records from the Western Hemisphere, leaving a considerable data gap in the Eastern Hemisphere.

Extreme solar storms may be more frequent than previously thought
An image from NASA’s Solar Dynamic Observatory shows a giant sunspot present in 2014. The sunspot spanned 80,000 miles. Credit: NASA/SDO

In the new study, Hayakawa and his colleagues wanted to improve reconstructions of the Carrington event and compare this event with other . They organized an and compiled historical observations of auroras during the storm from the Eastern Hemisphere and Iberian Peninsula to fill the gaps in their knowledge from studying only the Western Hemisphere records.

The researchers collected observations of the storm's auroras from the Russian Central Observatory, Japanese diaries, and newspapers from Portugal, Spain, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico and Brazil. They then compared these observations to previous reports of the storm from the Western Hemisphere, like ship logs, contemporary scientific journals, and more newspapers.

The researchers also analyzed several unpublished sunspot drawings made by European astronomers during the 1859 storm. Analyzing these drawings allowed them to determine where on the sun the storm originated and track how the sunspot group grew and shrank over time.

The newly recovered historical documents suggest the Carrington sunspot group had probably launched multiple outbursts from early August to early October, including a preceding solar storm in late August 1859. The researchers estimate this event happened around August 27th, 1859 and sent out separate coronal mass ejections that were strong enough to impact Earth's . The August storm may have played a role in making the September Carrington Event so intense.

After reconstructing the storms around the Carrington Event, the researchers compared the solar storm to other storms in 1872, 1909, 1921, and 1989 and found two of them—those in 1872 and 1921—were comparable to this event. The 1989 event caused a serious blackout throughout all of Quebec, Canada. This means events like the Carrington may not be as legendary and elusive as once thought, and scientists need to consider the hazards of such events more seriously than before, according to Hayakawa.

"While the 1859 storm was certainly one of the most extreme events, this seems at best comparable to the 1872 storm and 1921 storm in terms of its intensity," he said. "So, the Carrington event is no longer something unique. This fact may require us to reconsider the occurrence frequency of this kind of 'worst-case scenario' of space weather events."


Explore further

Researchers simulate 1770 magnetic storm using data from historical documentation

More information: Hisashi Hayakawa et al. Temporal and Spatial Evolutions of a Large Sunspot Group and Great Auroral Storms around the Carrington Event in 1859, Space Weather (2019). DOI: 10.1029/2019SW002269

This story is republished courtesy of AGU Blogs (http://blogs.agu.org), a community of Earth and space science blogs, hosted by the American Geophysical Union. Read the original story here.

Citation: Extreme solar storms may be more frequent than previously thought (2019, October 7) retrieved 20 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-10-extreme-solar-storms-frequent-previously.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
264 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Oct 08, 2019
"Extreme solar storms may be more frequent than previously thought"
"Probability of catastrophic geomagnetic storm lower than estimated"
Yin & Yang, Action & Reaction, Concave & Convex, Sow & Reap...... 'round & round we go!
'Reminds me of those incessant arguments splayed down dozens of scrolls of comments on most PHYS-ORG Astrophysics-related articles.
You know?
The same usual group of retired, time-devaluing intellectual-wannabees with no better place to stake their pride, than a forum of trolls trying to out-troll each other with accusations of being a troll.
.
Opps. Did I write that out loud?
I'm in for it now!
But lemme demonstrate how much I care.
Despite your endless investments in attempting to elicit the following, you will never, ever see it again. (Applicable to your squabble of choice)
"GOSH! I STAND CORRECTED! YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!! WHAT THE HELL WAS I THINKING? I SURRENDER MY INEPTNESS TO YOUR SUPERIOR ACUMEN!!!"
"Will you be my hero...sweety?"


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more