Backlash and gender fatigue. Why progress on gender equality has slowed

Backlash and gender fatigue. Why progress on gender equality has slowed
Pink pussy hats are out at International Women’s Day events, but they are facing opposition. Credit: Mark Dixon/Wikimedia, CC BY

We are in the midst of an outpouring of feminist activism kicked off by the pink pussy hat movement in the United States and propelled by #MeToo, which has spread to Australia where a range of luminaries have been named as harassers.

And yet we are also in the midst of a backlash, a concern that gender equality has moved too fast, aided by "gender fatigue".

Twenty-seven years ago, Susan Faludi created a furore by documenting what she said was a backlash against women. She said it wasn't new, as evidenced by penalties imposed on childless and unwed women in ancient Rome, and witch burnings of medieval Europe. Each was a response to perceptions that women were gaining ground.

This time it is taking the form of a resurgence of the men's rights movement, and also in the cries of #notallmen. It is evident in the trolling occurring on feminist websites, in the media and the rape, violence and death threats inflicted on feminist activists.

That's in social media and society. What about the workplace?

Backlash in the form of fatigue

It can be as simple as organisational silence and inaction. Even in organisations where managers and workers are committed to the idea of equality, it can take the form of resistance to specific initiatives.

It is aligned to gender fatigue, or seeing further advances in gender equality as a "non-issue".

My colleagues (Associate Professor Linda Colley, Dr. Meraiah Foley and Professor Rae Cooper) and I have examined managers' and employees' understanding of gender equality and have often been told "gender is not an issue here".

It is as if they are tired of hearing about it and want it to be "done".

While we have found many organisations which are well advanced in their journey, we have yet to find one in which it is actually done.

What's worth aiming for

Sometimes women are told that the remaining gender inequality is their own fault. #Metoo has been blamed for men being afraid to mentor women. Women are told to "lean in" – to focus on empowering individuals rather than in general.

British researchers Hazel Conley and Margaret Page say real change will only be achieved when there is "an understanding of gendered power and its intersections with other forms of inequality, individual commitment to act on this knowledge and the collective organisation to approach gender ."

That understanding might lead to non-hierarchical organisational structures with different concepts of power. It might subvert the concept of so that it is no longer regarded as the guiding force of lives. It might mean working to live, not living to work. It might mean that there isn't paid work and other work, just "work".

It might make future backlash unnecessary, and fatigue redundant.


Explore further

Top jobs still don't come with top pay for top women

Provided by The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.The Conversation

Citation: Backlash and gender fatigue. Why progress on gender equality has slowed (2019, March 8) retrieved 23 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-03-backlash-gender-fatigue-equality.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
2 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 27, 2019
Equality is a perennial topic because it can never be perfectly met. Reaching it is like reaching the North Pole - when you're close enough, taking too large a step towards it makes you overshoot and go further away from it.

That's what the backlash and fatigue is about. The closer we get to true equality where the practical differences between the genders are vanishing and the true reasons for the disparity are found elsewhere in society, the larger the steps taken by the moral entrepreneurs.

The resulting backlash is taken as anti-equality that demands more action: more campaigning, more marching and fundraising, more political activity... after all, when you're trying to gain power and wealth through other peoples' social issues, finding the issues solved would mean losing power and wealth, and that's not the point of the moral entrepreneurs.

Questioning the premise is also interpreted as anti-equality. In questions of social justice, opposition is wrong by default.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more