The ocean garbage patch is tiny compared to our carbon footprint

January 9, 2019 by Sarah Burns, Earth Institute, Columbia University
Litter on a beach in Singapore. Credit: Vaidehi Shah via Wikimedia Commons

Last summer, I volunteered in Indonesia on the islands of Simeulue and Bangkaru. During this unique opportunity, I helped to monitor and protect the local green sea turtle population, and I witnessed firsthand the effects of waste on the environment. Despite Bangkaru's lack of human inhabitants—aside from the occasional small group of volunteers and two wildlife rangers—nearly all of its shores were bordered with large amounts of trash, primarily plastic.

Like the trash on Bangkaru Island, carbon emissions have far-reaching impacts on the environment. And the effects of climate change, caused by the of greenhouse gases (GHGs), are often far removed from the greatest emitters.

Trash can sometimes seem like a larger problem than climate change. That is partly because the pollutants are much larger. Trash is often tangible and visible to the unaided eye. Dumping it far away may allow us to temporarily forget about the waste we produce, but the —littered beaches and giant garbage patches in the ocean—can quickly disrupt this illusion. GHGs, on the other hand, are more or less invisible. Sometimes we can see them at the source, but seconds after they're created, the gases disperse, their molecules disappearing into the air into which they are dumped. It is very difficult to track the location of these gases once they are released.

It may not seem like it, but the average American generates a lot more than trash. According to the World Bank, in 2014, the average American released approximately 36,700 pounds of carbon dioxide (CO2) the most common GHG. That's approximately 23 times greater by weight than the amount of trash each American threw away in 2013: 1,600 pounds. And that ratio is probably an underestimate, since the World Bank excludes GHG emissions from air and sea transportation. Plus, CO2 only accounts for 82 percent of total emissions—there are other GHGs that we're not counting here.

Each of the world's oceans houses a colossal trash island. The largest and most well-known is the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, which is possibly twice as large as Texas or as large as the continental U.S. As of March 2018, researchers estimated that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch weighed approximately 87,000 tons, as compared to the 7,600,000,000 tons of CO2 the U.S. emitted in 2014. If we try to picture those CO2 emissions in terms of geography, the area would be roughly 295 times larger than the Great Pacific Garbage Patch—or about the difference in size between the U.S. state of Georgia and all of Asia. Here's what that looks like:

The ocean garbage patch is tiny compared to our carbon footprint
Visual comparison of weight of trash in Great Pacific Garbage Patch compared to that of U.S. CO2 emissions. The continent of Asia (blue) represents U.S. CO2 emissions in 2014, covering an area approximately 295 times larger than the state of Georgia (green), which represents the amount of trash in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. Credit: Sarah Burns and Comparea

Making matters worse, we must also consider that people have been emitting CO2 for over 70 years longer than we've been producing plastics, the material that comprises the majority of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.

From the image above, we see that in terms of mass alone, CO2 emissions are much greater than from the Patch. Does this mean that we should put more emphasis on reducing and regulating emissions, rather than recycling and minimizing waste? Has your view of how much we should prioritize limiting or eliminating CO2 emissions changed based on this visualization?

If we can imagine the true size of the pollutants we release into the atmosphere on a daily basis, it is easier to develop the motivation to help create a permanent change within our power to limit anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions.

Explore further: Huge barrier isn't trapping plastic waste in Pacific Ocean

Related Stories

Trash burning worldwide significantly worsens air pollution

August 26, 2014

Unregulated trash burning around the globe is pumping far more pollution into the atmosphere than shown by official records. A new study led by the National Center for Atmospheric Research estimates that more than 40 percent ...

Marine debris study counts trash from Texas to Florida

December 28, 2018

Trash, particularly plastic, in the ocean and along the shoreline is an economic, environmental, human health, and aesthetic problem causing serious challenges to coastal communities around the world, including the Gulf of ...

Oceans of garbage prompt war on plastics

December 15, 2018

Faced with images of turtles smothered by plastic bags, beaches carpeted with garbage and islands of trash floating in the oceans, environmentalists say the world is waking up to the need to tackle plastic pollution at the ...

Recommended for you

Nanoscale Lamb wave-driven motors in nonliquid environments

March 19, 2019

Light driven movement is challenging in nonliquid environments as micro-sized objects can experience strong dry adhesion to contact surfaces and resist movement. In a recent study, Jinsheng Lu and co-workers at the College ...

OSIRIS-REx reveals asteroid Bennu has big surprises

March 19, 2019

A NASA spacecraft that will return a sample of a near-Earth asteroid named Bennu to Earth in 2023 made the first-ever close-up observations of particle plumes erupting from an asteroid's surface. Bennu also revealed itself ...

The powerful meteor that no one saw (except satellites)

March 19, 2019

At precisely 11:48 am on December 18, 2018, a large space rock heading straight for Earth at a speed of 19 miles per second exploded into a vast ball of fire as it entered the atmosphere, 15.9 miles above the Bering Sea.

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.