Global governance must overcome 'zeitgeist of mistrust' to tackle world's environmental issues

November 5, 2018, University of Sussex

The growing mistrust and hostility towards global intuitions must be overcome if the world is to successfully tackle the environmental challenges it faces, the head of the University of Sussex's global sustainability research centre has warned.

Professor Joseph Alcamo, Director of the Sussex Sustainability Research Programme (SSRP), said high-quality research and closer engagement with citizens around the world was needed to overcome the growing zeitgeist that viewed organisations such as the UN as meddling amid a geopolitical backdrop of cancelled treaties, neglected obligations and frozen negotiations.

Delivering his keynote speech at the 2018 Utrecht Conference on Earth System Governance this morning, Prof Alcamo said: "To many people earth system governance is not beautiful, it is worrisome, it means loss of control over their lives, and this mistrust is a big part of the national retrenchment going on.

The former UN Environment Chief Scientist also said: "The research community must find a way to fight in the global institutions needed for implementing the Sustainable Development Goals, and to figure out how to implement the goals efficiently."

Prof Alcamo warned those who believed in global governance would need to act in order to ensure that the major milestones achieved in 2015 including The Paris Climate Agreement, the 2030 Development Agenda, and the Sendai Framework were not part of the last wave of environmental globalism before the era of national retrenchment.

He said he believed there was a latent interest in global governance, illustrated by the one million tourists visiting the UN headquarters every year, and that engagement and cooperation through local civil society organisations and on-line could be vital to help rebuild trust.

Prof Alcamo said: "Even though I personally believe that we are morally obliged to achieve the SDGs—there are probably not enough important people in the world that feel the same way. But maybe, just maybe, they'll be enough self-interest in the governments of the rich countries and private sector to propel the SDGs forward.

"Environmental protection and other societal goals are not a zero sum game. We can have it all and in fact we can't have one without the other. Unfortunately this fallacy, this false dichotomy of a clash between economy and environment still has legs."

Explore further: Leading sustainability experts call for more efficient approach to deliver UN goals

Related Stories

Sustainable Development Goals must sustain people and planet

March 20, 2013

In the wake of last week's meetings at the UN on the definition of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), a group of international scientists have published a call in the journal Nature today, arguing for a set of six ...

The world's new sustainable development goals

September 22, 2015

On September 25 world leaders will meet in New York to formalise the new Sustainable Development Goals. These 17 goals will guide efforts to reduce poverty and increase well-being, without destroying the Earth. The Conversation ...

Recommended for you

Long-term study shows atmospheric biome fluctuates by season

November 13, 2018

A team of researchers with the LTER Environmental Monitoring Observatory in the Aigüestortes National Park in Spain has found that there is seasonal variation in atmospheric microbes. In their paper published in Proceedings ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

aksdad
not rated yet Nov 05, 2018
Yes, global governance is the solution. Only because pixie dust hasn't been tried yet.

Think about the impossibility of this. Who is going to take over the world and become the global government? Who has the absolute power and resources to do that? No one.

Without force to compel countries to subject themselves to a global government, how do you get them to submit? You don't.

And if you magically got every country on earth to subject themselves to a global government, how do you prevent it from becoming tyrannical and unaccountable to the people being governed? You can't, human nature being what it is.

The U.S. government, with its constitutional limitations on government, division of powers, checks and balances, and its relinquishing of powers to local government that are not specifically detailed in the constitution is the closest thing to accountable, representative, un-oppressive government there is on earth and still oppressive bureaucratic rules are made.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.