Your job might disappear, but don't blame artificial intelligence for that

October 25, 2018 by Anthony Hussenot, The Conversation
Credit: Shutterstock

When we talk about the jobs at risk, artificial intelligence is often seen as the main threat. However, this technology is still at its very beginning, while a lot of jobs are already transforming and even disappearing. Conversely, other jobs seem to resist, even if technologies already exist to replace them.

The extinction of some jobs

You don't need to be an expert to observe how some jobs are already dying, and the supermarket cashier is one of the most typical examples. For some years, increasing numbers of cashiers have been replaced by self-checkout machines, several of which can be run by one employee… The same can be seen in the fast-food restaurants, at the cinema, at the airport, etc. More and more companies are implementing machines based on apps, tablets, printers, and more, replacing people formerly in charge of the ordering, registering or payment processing. The remaining employees only check the machines and assist customers if needed.

The disappearance of these jobs has nothing to do with the rise of , as the technologies used have been on the market for a while. More precisely, any job based on delimited tasks, following a specific order, and making predefined choices could already be replaced by the existing technologies.

This is not a new phenomenon. Throughout the last century, a lot of jobs were replaced by machines. Who remember the ticket punchers, aircraft listeners, lamplighters or knockers up? All of these jobs disappeared decades ago, and were being replaced by machines. Actually, they were easily replaced by machines because they were designed as clear-cut, measurable and regularly scheduled tasks. Inherited mainly from the industrial and bureaucratic era, most of these jobs were designed based on the model of the machine. At the end of the day, it was not so difficult to design machine to replace them.

Resisting the rise of automation

However, some jobs resist the rise of automation, in spite of technologies already available on the market. A good example is the librarian: Even if we can consult or buy any book online, librarians have transformed public libraries to stay relevant. The same applies for booksellers, bartenders, florists and more. For instance, in spite of the implementation of numerous automatic coffee machines in most of the public places (train stations, universities, libraries, etc.), people still go and spend time in coffee shops. In a way, the success of chains such as Starbucks can seem a bit anachronistic, as it is cheaper to buy a coffee at the automatic coffee-machine.

Of course, there are many reasons to go to the coffee-shop rather than just grabbing a cup of coffee at the automatic coffee machine, and if we put the quality of the coffee aside, one of the main reasons seems to be the social experience we live. In a 2018 book, Palaces for the People, Eric Klinenberg suggests that places such as are social infrastructures that play an increasingly important role in our social lives. In a time when people can easily feel isolated, we need more and more places to connect people – and the that make them possible.

Why do some jobs resist while other are dying?

According to a 2013 Oxford University study are facing the same issue.

Conversely, the bartender and the bookseller provide a social experience that people like. It is unlikely – this is always a risky bet to predict the future – that robots will replace the bartenders as they participate in providing a good when we go to the bar or the restaurant. This is even, one might guess, one of the main reason why we go to a bar. Of course, the artificial intelligence will sooner or later affect the world of work as this will even be able to perform some creative and cognitive tasks or to express emotions, but we do not need to wait for it to think the future of work.

If you are doing a more technical job than a social one, then your position is at risk (except maybe if you're doing a creative one). Not in the next 5 to 10 years, but right now. It means that some people might face unemployment, whatever the evolution of technologies. However, if one considers that the social skills will be more and more important – the technical ones can already be partly or entirely automated – qualities such as the empathy, emotional intelligence, and even kindness could well be rewarded on the job market. At the end of the day, no robot or app will replace a smile, a glance or a friendly gesture. At least, not yet.

Explore further: Study suggests smaller cities likely to see more job loss due to automation

Related Stories

Few jobs can be completely replaced by new technologies

February 12, 2018

Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotics can perform an increasingly wider variety of jobs, and automation is no longer confined to routine tasks. Nevertheless, the automation potential for non-routine tasks ...

Machine learning will redesign, not replace, work

June 26, 2018

The conversation around artificial intelligence and automation seems dominated by either doomsayers who fear robots will supplant all humans in the workforce, or optimists who think there's nothing new under the sun. But ...

Recommended for you

Nanoscale Lamb wave-driven motors in nonliquid environments

March 19, 2019

Light driven movement is challenging in nonliquid environments as micro-sized objects can experience strong dry adhesion to contact surfaces and resist movement. In a recent study, Jinsheng Lu and co-workers at the College ...

OSIRIS-REx reveals asteroid Bennu has big surprises

March 19, 2019

A NASA spacecraft that will return a sample of a near-Earth asteroid named Bennu to Earth in 2023 made the first-ever close-up observations of particle plumes erupting from an asteroid's surface. Bennu also revealed itself ...

The powerful meteor that no one saw (except satellites)

March 19, 2019

At precisely 11:48 am on December 18, 2018, a large space rock heading straight for Earth at a speed of 19 miles per second exploded into a vast ball of fire as it entered the atmosphere, 15.9 miles above the Bering Sea.

Revealing the rules behind virus scaffold construction

March 19, 2019

A team of researchers including Northwestern Engineering faculty has expanded the understanding of how virus shells self-assemble, an important step toward developing techniques that use viruses as vehicles to deliver targeted ...

Levitating objects with light

March 19, 2019

Researchers at Caltech have designed a way to levitate and propel objects using only light, by creating specific nanoscale patterning on the objects' surfaces.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Oct 25, 2018
what a dumb article, just plainly stupid.....

The person who wrote it never has read about this topic, it is very evident....

Many news outlets had published hundreds of papers showing in detail the problem with AI replacing jobs.

Does the author know that amazon is about to open thousands of stores without employees inside them? Does he know that those stores are already operating in China?
What about the replacing of physicians, lawyers, etc? it has been published by the BBC, the new york times, etc....
Did he see a video of the robots of boston dynamics?

Of course, the goal of the paper is that people that can not find a job must blame themselves, not the rich pushing them out to replace them with a machine. But the rich are about to see what happens to sales when there are nobody receiving a paycheck !!!!
1 / 5 (1) Oct 25, 2018
Automated tills are coming to stores mainly because people are negotiating their wages higher than the cost of the machines.

Many news outlets had published hundreds of papers showing in detail the problem with AI replacing jobs.

And pretty much all of it is Kurtzweilian bunk. It actually costs more to replace people with automation, because then you're left with sustaining the people by welfare and high taxes, and the public backlash which negates the benefit of using automation.

The problem is merely that people are demanding too much - everybody wants simple entry level jobs without education or experience requirements to pay a middle class income, basically make their McJob a career instead of trying for other opportunities. Everybody wants to live in the city, the city wants more taxpayers, but then there's not enough jobs and the wages go down, so they are trying to force the wages back up through the state.

Well, the business picks the next cheaper option.
not rated yet Oct 25, 2018
amazon is about to open thousands of stores without employees inside them?

Amazon is already a webstore that has no front desk employees. Those stores are essentially just distribution points to avoid paying the delivery.
5 / 5 (1) Oct 25, 2018
Actually, they were easily replaced by machines because they were designed as clear-cut, measurable and regularly scheduled tasks.

In the immortal words of a system admin:
"Don't get on my nerves or I'll replace your job with a script"

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.