Experiencing extreme weather is not enough to convince climate chance sceptics

October 1, 2018, University of Exeter
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Experiencing extreme weather is not enough to convince climate change sceptics than humans are damaging the environment, a new study shows.

Political bias and partisan news reporting influence whether people report experiencing certain events, the research suggests.

But Americans who lived in areas where a variety of extreme events were recorded—flood, tornado, hurricane, and —were ultimately no more likely to share the same beliefs about climate change as scientists.

Dr. Ben Lyons, from the University of Exeter, who led the research, said: ""Extreme plays a limited long-term role in forming people's beliefs about climate change. Instead, their views and beliefs can alter the way they perceive the weather. We have found when an extreme weather event is ambiguous, as with polar vortex and drought, people are more likely to see the event through a partisan lens. If there is grey area, people are more comfortable applying their preferred label."

The University of Exeter, University of Michigan and University of Texas research found that Republicans were less likely to report experiencing a polar vortex, while those exposed to liberal media were more likely.

However the weather can be sometimes so extreme that it overshadows personal views—the researchers found that partisanship and media use did not affect the way people in the American Northeast—where the 2014 and 2015 polar vortex events hit hardest—reported the weather they had experienced.

Those who favoured liberal news sources such as the Huffington Post or the Daily Show reported experiencing drought more often than national weather data would suggest they actually did.

Dr. Lyons said: "Very extreme weather accompanied by constant media coverage is harder for people to deny. But on the other end of the scale, droughts can take longer to have an effect, so people have some difficulty perceiving their onset and this may allow them to bring their biases to the table."

Academics surveyed 3,057 people in the USA to ask them about the extreme weather they had experienced over a five-year period, and also if they believed in climate change, human causation, and the scientific consensus on the matter. They also asked where they lived. The experts were then able to compare these answers to official weather reports for that region for the same time period.

Data about the weather was taken from the Storm Events Database compiled by NOAA's National Weather Service (NWS). The data included droughts, floods, tornadoes, and hurricanes.A total of 21.7 per cent of respondents reported experiencing a , 41.0 per cent a drought, 19.8 per cent a tornado, 29.3 per cent flood, and 16.7 per cent a hurricane in the past five years. However the data shows 21.3 per cent lived in a county where a flood was recorded over the time period, 25.3 per cent a tornado, 4.3 per cent a hurricane, and 4.4 per cent drought.

A total of 59.2 per cent of respondents agreed that "there is solid evidence that the average temperature on earth has been getting warmer over the past few decades." Of respondents who agreed with this statement, 74.2 per cent agreed that the Earth was warming mostly due to "human activity such as burning fossil fuels".

Dr. Lyons said: "This research shows 's perception of extreme weather can be processed through partisan lenses. This means efforts to connect with may do more to rally those with liberal beliefs than convince those with more conservative views that humans are having an impact on the ."However, it's important to note that we take a big-picture look rather than focus on specific events. Particularly intense events—a 100-year flood or catastrophic hurricane—might be most capable of influencing attitudes."

Enduring Extremes? Polar Vortex, Drought, and Climate Change Beliefs is published in the journal Environmental Communication.

Explore further: Extreme weather has limited effect on attitudes toward climate policies

More information: Benjamin A. Lyons et al, Enduring Extremes? Polar Vortex, Drought, and Climate Change Beliefs, Environmental Communication (2018). DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1520735

Related Stories

Teachable moments about climate change

October 14, 2014

First-hand experience of extreme weather often makes people change their minds about the realities of climate change. That's because people are simply more aware of an extreme weather event the closer they are to its core, ...

2016 extreme weather events and ties to climate change

December 14, 2017

According to a new research report published today in a special edition of the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, the 2016 global average temperature and extreme heat wave over Asia occurred due to continued ...

Recommended for you

A glimmer of hope for the world's coral reefs

December 10, 2018

The future of the world's coral reefs is uncertain, as the impact of global heating continues to escalate. However, according to a study published today in Nature Climate Change, the response of the Great Barrier Reef to ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

aksdad
2.1 / 5 (7) Oct 01, 2018
The reason why "extreme" weather fails to sway skeptics is because it's weather not climate. The difference between informed skeptics and alarmists is that alarmists think that recent weather has never happened before. Skeptics know that extreme weather has happened many times before. They can point to data that shows that there is nothing unprecedented about current weather and there are no trends showing that weather is worsening. The IPCC acknowledges this in AR5 Chapter 2 - Observations: Atmosphere and Surface, pp.208-217. There are no discernible global trends in the measured data. The fact that alarmists claims of worsening weather still hasn't appeared in the data should be proof that their various theories predicting more extreme weather are wrong, but one should never underestimate the capacity for self-deception of true believers.
MR166
1 / 5 (3) Oct 01, 2018
:" "Very extreme weather accompanied by constant media coverage is harder for people to deny. ........."

Yea it is the constant media coverage that makes it true! It is an affront to science that this person has a doctorate degree.
Parsec
5 / 5 (3) Oct 01, 2018
The idea that extreme weather events have not yet appeared in the data or that there are no discernable global trends yet is not just partisan nonsense, its an outright falsehood.

I find it ironic in the extreme about your put down of true believers, when you demonstrate you are one of those simple minded true believers who have to make up stuff you probably know is untrue to justify your own blindness.

How many consecutive years of 200-1000 year extreme events do you need to see the truth dude?
MR166
1 / 5 (4) Oct 01, 2018
Yup, every weather event is a 1000 year event. Oh wait,,,,,we are not convincing people yet let's call tje next one a 10,000 year event .

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.