Climate models fail to simulate recent air-pressure changes over Greenland

October 16, 2018, University of Lincoln
Climatologists may be unable to accurately predict climate change because computer model simulations fail to accurately include air pressure changes that have taken place in the Greenland region, pictured, over the last three decades. Credit: Professor Edward Hanna

Climatologists may be unable to accurately predict regional climate change over the North Atlantic because computer model simulations have failed to accurately include air pressure changes that have taken place in the Greenland region over the last three decades.

This deficiency may mean predictions for the UK and parts of Europe could be inaccurate, according to new research published today.

Researchers compared real data with simulation data over a 30 year period and found that the simulations on average showed slightly decreasing in the Greenland region, when in fact, the real data showed a significant increase in high air pressure—or so-called 'Greenland blocking' - during the summer months. These simulations are widely used by climate scientists worldwide as a basis for predicting .

The findings raise serious questions about the accuracy of regional climate projections in the UK and neighbouring parts of Europe because meteorological conditions in those regions are closely linked to air-pressure changes over Greenland.

Researchers warn that record wet summers in England and Wales such as those experienced in 2007 and 2012 could become more frequent if Greenland air pressure continues to strengthen over the next few decades, but such a trend might not be predicted due to inaccurate regional climate simulations.

A failure of computer simulation models to include real data on climate change in Greenland could mean regional climate predictions for the UK and parts of Europe could be inaccurate. Pictured is the Greenland region. Credit: Professor Edward Hanna

The study, carried out by the University of Lincoln, UK, and the University of Liège in Belgium, also concluded that current models of melting on the Greenland Ice Sheet—a vast body of ice which covers more than 80 per cent of the surface of Greenland—may significantly underestimate the global sea-level rise expected by 2100.

Professor Edward Hanna led the study with Dr. Richard Hall, both from the University of Lincoln's School of Geography, and Dr. Xavier Fettweis of University of Liège. Professor Hanna said: "These differences between the estimates from the current climate models and observations suggests that the models cannot accurately represent recent conditions or predict future changes in Greenland climate.

"While there is natural variability in the climate system, we think that the recent rapid warming over Greenland since the early 1990s is not being fully simulated by the models, and that this misrepresentation could mean that future changes in atmospheric circulation and the jet stream over the wider North Atlantic region may not be properly simulated.

"Until now, no-one has systematically examined the projections to see how they represent the last few decades and future changes—up to the year 2100—from a Greenland regional perspective. Previous work reported a tendency for global warming to result in a slightly more active jet stream in the atmosphere over the North Atlantic by 2100 but our results indicate we may actually see a somewhat weaker jet, at least in summer."

The research is the first to systematically compare global data and observational data of air pressure changes for the Greenland region. The study, Recent changes in summer Greenland blocking captured by none of the CMIP5 models has been published in the European Geosciences Union journal, The Cryosphere.

Explore further: Study links natural climate oscillations in north Atlantic to Greenland ice sheet melt

More information: Edward Hanna et al, Recent changes in summer Greenland blocking captured by none of the CMIP5 models, The Cryosphere Discussions (2018). DOI: 10.5194/tc-2018-91

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Study: With Twitter, race of the messenger matters

February 23, 2019

When NFL player Colin Kaepernick took a knee during the national anthem to protest police brutality and racial injustice, the ensuing debate took traditional and social media by storm. University of Kansas researchers have ...

After a reset, Сuriosity is operating normally

February 23, 2019

NASA's Curiosity rover is busy making new discoveries on Mars. The rover has been climbing Mount Sharp since 2014 and recently reached a clay region that may offer new clues about the ancient Martian environment's potential ...

Researchers engineer a tougher fiber

February 22, 2019

North Carolina State University researchers have developed a fiber that combines the elasticity of rubber with the strength of a metal, resulting in a tougher material that could be incorporated into soft robotics, packaging ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.6 / 5 (7) Oct 16, 2018
Climate models were likewise unable to project the global atmospheric ~2000-2017 zero T-slope. That's not the real problem however, but rather the unwillingness of (most) climatologists to accept the data and their implications, but rather employ a scatter-gun volley of papers attributing the phenomenon to stochastic variation, statistical noise, etc. or deny the whole thing altogether and point to melting ice.
2 / 5 (4) Oct 16, 2018
where's the local 'troll patrol' of warming loonies now ' ?
4.6 / 5 (9) Oct 16, 2018
The usually cherry-pickers are here to cast doubt on the basic science while ignoring the other conclusion of the study, which is that projections of melting and sea level rise may be underestimating the effect.
2 / 5 (4) Oct 16, 2018
of course they did ,what else would you expect ?
4 / 5 (4) Oct 16, 2018
That's because of your ignorance @snoosebaum!
5 / 5 (3) Oct 17, 2018
I may be wrong about predicting which lamp post a car spinning out of control is going to hit, but it doesn't take a genius to know that something bad is going to happen as a consequence of that car's behavior.

Similarly, climate models are models, based on data input by humans, trying to predict with specificity what will happen. Unfortunately, there is a learning curve in deciding what data is relevant to the model. Thus, specificity in forecast is reduced, but that doesn't argue against the fact that climate change is a'comin'.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.