A call to protect much more land and sea from human encroachment

September 14, 2018 by Bob Yirka, Phys.org report
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

A noted figure in the science world has paired with a colleague to pen an editorial for the journal Science. Jonathan Baillie, executive VP and chief scientist at the National Geographic Society and Ya-Ping Zhang with the Chinese Academy of Sciences have published a paper strongly supporting the idea of establishing many more land and sea areas as protected sites. Failure to do so, they warn, could spell doom for many species, perhaps including our own.

The writers open their paper by asking a simple question: How much of planet Earth should be protected from human interference? They note that the human population has grown to enormous levels, and will likely continue to grow ever larger. That has led to a need for more land and sea resources to support them. They note that despite this need, humans must find a way to preserve natural ecosystems—and a lot more of them than current protocols are calling for. They suggest that the governments of the world need to unite behind a common goal—setting aside 30 percent of the world's land and oceans by 2030 and then raising that amount to 50 percent by 2050. The researchers acknowledge that achieving such a goal presents formidable challenges, but argue that doing anything less will likely result in mass extinctions and could jeopardize our own future, as well.

The authors note that currently, just 14.7 percent of the Earth's total land area and 3.6 percent of ocean areas are protected, highlighting the urgency of this issue. They further note that in 2010, the world's major players met to discuss strategies for maintaining biodiversity in the face of growing human demands. They came up with 20 targets, one of which called for designating 17 percent of the land and 10 percent of the world's oceans as protected. Baillie and Zhang suggest such targets would be "woefully inadequate." They propose that more realistic targets need to be established—though they acknowledge that identifying such targets is extremely challenging, considering the limited understanding of how the world's ecosystems actually work. They believe it would be appropriate to err on the side of caution by designating more of the planet as protected than current targets. They also point out that logic suggests that the land and sea areas that are designated as protected should include those that need it most—those that are the most biologically diverse.

Explore further: Protected areas alone won't save all threatened species

More information: Jonathan Baillie et al. Space for nature, Science (2018). DOI: 10.1126/science.aau1397

Related Stories

Bolder targets needed to protect nature for people's sake

June 18, 2018

University of Queensland (UQ) and Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) researchers argue that the world needs more diverse, ambitious and area-specific targets for retaining important natural systems to safeguard humanity. ...

Three urgent steps for better protected areas

November 5, 2015

A group of scientists have developed a three-point plan to ensure the world's protected areas meet new biodiversity targets set by the 193 signatory nations of the Convention on Biological Diversity's (CBD). They recognize ...

Recommended for you

Carbon goes with the flow

November 13, 2018

Many people see the carbon cycle as vertical—CO2 moving up and down between soil, plants and the atmosphere.

Long-term study shows atmospheric biome fluctuates by season

November 13, 2018

A team of researchers with the LTER Environmental Monitoring Observatory in the Aigüestortes National Park in Spain has found that there is seasonal variation in atmospheric microbes. In their paper published in Proceedings ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

V4Vendicar
not rated yet Sep 16, 2018
These communist efforts are fundamentally Anti-God.

His commandment was to be fruitful and multiply.

We have dominion over the Earth and the plants and animals here were given to us by God to do with them as we will.
V4Vendicar
not rated yet Sep 16, 2018
These communist efforts are fundamentally Anti-God.

His commandment was to be fruitful and multiply.

We have dominion over the Earth and the plants and animals here were given to us by God to do with them as we will.
V4Vendicar
not rated yet Sep 16, 2018
These communist efforts are fundamentally Anti-God.

His commandment was to be fruitful and multiply.

We have dominion over the Earth and the plants and animals here were given to us by God to do with them as we will.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.