What does it mean to be cisgender?

September 19, 2018, The Conversation
The term ‘cisgender’ entered the Oxford English Dictionary in 2015. Credit: Shutterstock.com

As a term and concept, "transgender" is now firmly embedded in common parlance and popular consciousness. In Australia in the last few weeks alone there have been major news stories about transgender footballer Hannah Mouncey; Prime Minister Scott Morrison's comments regarding "gender whisperers"; and the University of Western Australia cancelling a talk by an anti-transgender US academic.

"Transgender" has an important linguistic counterpart that is not as common but is gaining prevalence. The term "cisgender" (pronounced "sis-gender") refers to people whose gender identity and expression matches the biological sex they were assigned when they were born. For instance, the musician Moby has said he is a "run-of-the-mill, cisgender, heterosexual male."

"Cisgender" was introduced so our language could be more fair and inclusive, and to make us more aware of everybody's experiences of gender. However, the term has critics as well as fans.

What are the word's origins?

The prefix "trans-" comes from Latin, meaning "across from" or "on the other side of." In contrast, the prefix "cis-" means "on this side of." It is commonly used in chemistry and in relation to geographic features, such as in "cisalpine."

"Cisgender" was coined in academic journal articles in the 1990s. It started to gain broader popularity from around 2007 when transgender theorist Julia Serano discussed it in her book Whipping Girl. Over the next decade, activists, scholars and online forums helped to, literally, spread the word.

It is largely used by those who are sensitive to issues of gender and identity. Nevertheless, its general acceptance and endurance as a term and concept was acknowledged when it was added to the Oxford English Dictionary in 2015.

Cisgender relates specifically to gender rather than sexuality. A person can be cisgender (often abbreviated to just cis) and have any sort of sexuality. For example, two men may both be cisgender but one straight and one gay.

Because it is a personal identity category, it is difficult to know just from looking at someone whether they are cisgender.

Why is it useful?

This term is seen has having some important uses. One is that it helps us distinguish between sexual identity and gender identity. However, its most significant function is perhaps that naming something allows us to think about it more clearly.

Having a word for a "just usual" gender identity enables us to understand it is actually a specific gender identity in itself. The idea that people are cisgender therefore shows that, no matter who you are, the relationship between your body and your sense of self is particular.

Drawing attention to gender in this way can also highlight that some people are disadvantaged because of their gender identity. That is, this term can create awareness that people who are not cisgender often have a harder time in our society than those who are. For example, trans men and women report higher levels of physical and verbal abuse than cisgender people.

Detractors

Despite the inclusive potential of the word, it also has many detractors who warn about possible negative impacts. Some believe it sets up a harmful distinction between transgender people and everybody else. In this sense, the term can be counter-intuitive and work against transgender becoming more accepted and normalised.

It can also falsely imply that only people experience any form of mismatch between their body/sex and their gender identity. For example, lesbian, gay and bisexual people in particular may be deemed cisgender but experience conflict between their gender and how society expects them to express their gender.

Others have identified the term does not properly account for intersex people. Because intersex people have atypical sex characteristics (for example genitals, hormones, reproductive glands and/or chromosomes), it is problematic to define their in relation to the sex they were born.

From these perspectives, cisgender is limiting and divisive because it indicates there are only two possible gender identities linked to only two sexes.

Finally, some people think "cisgender" will not be fully integrated into common language because of how unusual it is to spell and say. For this reason, clearer terms such as "non-trans" have been suggested instead.

As our understanding of gender continues to change, the words we have to describe our experiences of it will also evolve. Ideally these words will help us rectify inequalities between identities.

Explore further: Few health differences for trans, cisgender veterans

Related Stories

Few health differences for trans, cisgender veterans

July 30, 2018

(HealthDay)—Transgender U.S. veterans have few health differences compared with cisgender veterans, although the odds of having at least one disability are higher for transgender veterans, according to a study published ...

Recommended for you

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

julianpenrod
1 / 5 (1) Sep 19, 2018
Among other things, the article can applaud treating sex deviances as acceptable, but it doesn't change their nature. For example, to talk about a number of the issues of "gender identity" boils down to men who like to wear dresses and women who like to curse. Adopting societal qualities of other sexes is the defining quality, often. But dresses and cursing are not in the DNA! The gender "natures" of such individuals are all illusory manifestations of people with possible weak or self absorbed mentalities or tendencies to gratuitously deliberately be at variance with others or some combination of them.
And how telling that "transgenderism" is so "accepted" in Australia that a "university" there cancelled a talk by someone with an opposite point. Is this the way it is with all Australians, give them a novel, sick idea and they'll embrace it and refuse to listen to opposite statements because maybe they'll have to admit they're wrong?
rrwillsj
5 / 5 (1) Sep 19, 2018
So jp, if I understand your babbling rant correctly? You are whining that these "other" people are distracting everyone from paying attention to you? No matter how sparkly your altright fairy uniform is?

And no, no... your revelation of your internalized inferiority complex, really isn't all that interesting.

Maybe the Social Science and Mental Health students monitoring these comments on the Phys.org site might be interested? You should contact them directly for evaluation and treatment.
Whydening Gyre
5 / 5 (1) Sep 19, 2018
JP... You should try wearing a skirt on a hot day... IT is GREAT...
Of course, I call mine a kilt..
rrwillsj
5 / 5 (1) Sep 20, 2018
Yeah, I was at a pub in The portside of Hull. GB. When a pack of drunken ,merchant marines started hassling, jeering at two men standing at the bar.

A big Jock wearing a kilt and some little guy, probably Malay.? Wearing whatever they call their version of a kilt.

Betcha the merchies officers were a bit upset at receiving back the battered lumps of their crew!

It was sweet to watch the Scotsman and Malay fists a'flying! Lot more believable than the crap that gets broadcasted.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.