Wildflowers combat climate change with diversity

August 3, 2018 by Adrienne Berard, The College of William & Mary
Wildflowers combat climate change with diversity
Josh Puzey, assistant professor of biology, is the co-author of a study that links natural selection and genetic variation using wildflowers. Puzey was part of a team of scientists who collected and analyzed seeds from 187 different seep monkey wildflowers (Mimulus guttatus) growing in the Iron Mountain region of Oregon. Credit: Josh Puzey

In 1859, when Charles Darwin first articulated the theory of evolution, he speculated that a process of natural selection led species to adapt to their environments over time. He believed traits that helped an organism survive were passed down to offspring, who would pass those traits on to more offspring, eventually leading to the diversity of life we see today.

There was only one problem, Darwin didn't actually understand how worked. It would take decades before scientists would discover genetics and the outlines of how traits are passed down— with Watson and Crick famously revealing DNA's double helix shape in 1953.

For Josh Puzey, assistant professor of biology at William & Mary, there was a missing step in the trajectory from Darwin's theory to mapping genomes. Puzey wanted to explain why there is such variation within species. If natural selection is as powerful as Darwin predicted, why aren't individuals within a species all indistinguishable and equally fit?

"A simple, though perhaps a slightly naïve expectation, is that there should be no variation, because natural selection has pushed species towards a single optimum," Puzey said. "So the question is: how does genetic variation persist in the face of natural selection?"

It's a question Puzey is one step closer to solving. A paper he co-authored, "Selective trade-offs maintain alleles underpinning complex trait variation in plants," was published today in the journal Science. The study finds a crucial link between natural selection and genetic variation. Puzey's co-authors include Ashley Troth, Rebecca Kim, John Willis and John Kelly. Their research was funded by the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation.

Puzey says the study is a breakthrough as one of the first to link phenotype (physical traits) and fitness (ability to reproduce and leave offspring) to genotype (traits coded into an individual's DNA). To understand the difference between phenotype and genotype, think of the flamingo. A flamingo turns pink when it eats a certain kind of shrimp.

The shrimp diet changes the flamingo's phenotype, its color, but it's not directly affecting the flamingo's genotype. Phenotype can change quickly as a direct result of environmental shifts. Genotype change is generational, through passing genes to offspring.

"We think about evolution and natural selection as always trying to find a more fit phenotype," Puzey said. "When you have thousands of wildflowers on the side of a mountain, if evolution has been acting for generations, you'd predict they would all have the same phenotype. But they don't, so we conducted a kind of a brute force study to tackle this question."

Puzey was part of a team of scientists from four American research institutions who collected and analyzed seeds from 187 different seep monkey wildflowers (Mimulus guttatus) growing in the Iron Mountain region of Oregon.

Using the seeds, the researchers were able to sequence the genome of each individual flower. Then they returned to Oregon and planted the sequenced seeds on the same mountain where they were originally collected.

The team monitored each of the seedlings over the course of two years, measuring their fitness along the way. They recorded how many seeds each one produced, how well each flowered, if the flower reached reproductive maturity.

"Using those individuals, we were able to connect the genotype to the phenotype," Puzey said. "As the flowers grew, we knew what was happening with the genes underneath and how those genes connected to the phenotype. That was the real novel part of this study."

Wildflowers combat climate change with diversity
The climate fluctuations are so extreme in the Iron Mountain region that researchers believe the genetic diversity within the seep monkey population should allow for it to adapt to long-term climate change. Credit: Josh Puzey

The team was able to identify specific regions in the genome that control flowering time and flower size. They found that the same region controls both traits. Late-blooming flowers produced bigger flowers than early-bloomers.

The researchers found traits that appeared as part of the phenotype—the way each individual looked—were physically connected to the genotype, Puzey explained. Simply put, the flowers had evolved over time to maintain genetic variation in flower size, because it helped them survive.

Natural selection chooses phenotypes that are most fit to the native environment, but if that environment is always fluctuating, then selection may have acted to maintain genetic variation in order to deal with whatever the environment throws at it.

"We found that fitness is dependent on the environment they are growing in during that exact year," Puzey said.

In one year, there was a short period of water availability as snow melted. The short, wet period was followed by the rapid onset of summer. The seep monkey flowers that were smaller and flowered sooner were more likely to reach productive maturity under those conditions, Puzey explained.

The following year, spring rains lasted longer and the summer drought arrived much later in the season. In that year, the researchers found the individuals that grew larger and flowered later were fitter.

"Sometimes small flowers are favored and sometimes big flowers are favored, depending on how wet it is," Puzey said. "So we have one answer to the question 'how is maintained in the face of natural selection?' Interannual variation selects alternate genetic makeups and alternate in opposite years, allowing variation to persist."

Since the genetic makeup of seep monkey flowers is so well-adapted to interannual climate fluctuations, the researchers wondered whether the genetic variations maintained in the wildflower could be beneficial for adapting to climate change.

"It's a more applied conservation question," Puzey said. "Is there enough variation present in these natural populations to adapt rapidly to global climate change?"

The researchers believe there is. The climate fluctuations are so extreme in the Iron Mountain region that researchers believe the genetic diversity within the seep monkey population should allow for it to adapt to long-term climate change.

Puzey warns that good news for seep monkey does not necessarily mean good news for other Iron Mountain wildlife. Changes in flowering time and flower size has a direct impact on pollinators such as foraging bees. Any changes in foraging patterns could affect other wildflowers and impact what species bloom at what time. Puzey stresses there is an entire ecosystem at stake.

"While this paints a promising picture for Mimulus in the face of ," Puzey said, "there are many interactions not represented in our study. Some of them could completely fall apart as the climate warms."

Explore further: Invasive plants adapt to new environments, study finds

More information: Selective trade-offs maintain alleles underpinning complex trait variation in plants. Science.  03 Aug 2018: DOI: 10.1126/science.aat5760

Related Stories

Natural selection still at work in humans

April 18, 2018

Evolution has shaped the human race, with University of Queensland researchers finding signatures of natural selection in the genome that influence traits associated with fertility and heart function.

Recommended for you

Old species learn new tricks... very slowly

August 15, 2018

A quick look at the fossil record shows that no species lasts forever. On average, most species exist for around a million years, although some species persist for much longer. A new study published in Scientific Reports ...

The secret behind cell revival revealed

August 15, 2018

Scientists from the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), have identified 85 genes essential for fission yeast cells at rest, under nutritionally limited environmental conditions, to maintain ...

How gene hunting changed the culture of science

August 15, 2018

Years after the end of the Human Genome Project (HGP), which mapped the human genetic blueprint, its contributions to science and scientific culture are still unfolding. Ioannis Pavlidis, Eckhard Pfeiffer Professor of Computational ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

RobertKarlStonjek
5 / 5 (1) Aug 03, 2018
Why mention Crick and Watson??? The big breakthrough came in 1943 when Oswald Avery, and his coworkers Colin MacLeod and Maclyn McCarty discovered that genetic information was passed between generations via DNA, a molecule first discovered by Friedrich Miescher in 1869. The shape of DNA is irrelevant without knowing its role in inheritance...
Anonym334113
not rated yet Aug 05, 2018
"...genetic information was passed between generations via DNA, a molecule first discovered by Friedrich Miescher in 1869." I Your comment would have carried more weight had you not called DNA a "molecule".
Old_C_Code
3 / 5 (2) Aug 05, 2018
DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) is a molecule.
taalto
not rated yet Aug 06, 2018
Reasons why DNA doesn't determine traits
Multiple different information layers in the cell respond to environmental signals
1. DNA sections (sequences) are never used directly by cellular mechanisms. Parts of the DNA are always read into a template RNA strand (transcription) before further processing. The template RNA is then modified by several complex mechanisms, such as alternative splicing machinery. The mature RNA-product is regulated by several epigenetic factors and mechanisms before final protein production.

2. DNA genes need to be told at what level they are activated or silenced. This is regulated by several mechanisms and factors, such as chromatin structure and folding (3D genome). Histone epigenetic markers affect strongly the folding and shape of chromatin. Chromatin structure is organized by complex motor protein called condensin...

Read more at http://scienceref...its.html

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.