Study on race and genetics finds Americans have nuanced understanding of race

August 16, 2018 by Jon Yates, Northwestern University
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Despite believing that race relations are getting worse, a majority of Americans agree that someone's racial identity is not hard-wired into their DNA, according to a new survey by Northwestern University's Center for the Study of Diversity and Democracy (CSDD), in collaboration with DNA testing company 23andMe.

The recent availability of at-home DNA testing has helped millions of Americans learn the traits, heritage and history they share with each other. While there is a long history of polling to look at attitudes regarding relations, this new is the first to look at people's perceptions and attitudes regarding race and genetics, said Alvin B. Tillery, Jr., director of CSDD.

Tillery, who led the study with Joanna Mountain, senior director of research at 23andMe, said he was surprised by some of the results.

"What I expected is that about two-thirds of Americans would believe that race and genetics are tightly bound together. We found the opposite," he said. "Only about a third of Americans nationally see a strong connection."

About 51 percent of Americans think that race is separate from DNA, while only 34 percent said they believe genetics "totally" determines , according to the survey. The science also supports this nuanced understanding of racial categories. In fact, what we think of as race is largely a "social construct," not a biological one, Tillery said. Each person is actually 99.5 percent genetically similar.

But the survey also found that race relations are at a low point, a problem that has been confirmed in other polling data. About 73 percent said racism is a problem, and more than half of those surveyed (56 percent) said race relations are getting worse, not better.

At the same time, Tillery said there was much to be optimistic about from this survey, which could point toward future research on Americans' evolving perceptions around race.

For example, about 35 percent of Americans said that culture plays a role in racial identity. The same percentage said history also plays a role. About 18 percent said that racial identity is based on a personal choice.

Fewer than half of Americans, 48 percent, said that skin color is the best way to identify a person's race. Latinos—the most admixed population—were more likely to reject skin color to determine racial identity. About half of the respondents of Asian descent in the survey said that shared culture was a key factor in their racial identity, versus 35 percent of the population as a whole.

"What seems important to me is how responses differed across the groups," said Mountain, 23andMe's senior director of research, who was also involved in designing the study. "I'm excited by how the results of this survey can kick start a frank conversation about genetics and racial ."

Tillery said the point wasn't just to look at race and genetics, but also whether testing might be making matters better or worse. Some critics of DNA testing argue that it reinforces racial differences. They point to something called "reification theory," a concept that in this context means DNA testing solidifies people's definitions of racial categories, making them seem more concrete.

But there isn't much evidence to support this. It's possible that testing does the opposite by reminding people of how mixed we all are, but neither theory has yet been proven. 23andMe plans to do follow-up surveys to learn more.

About the study

Data were collected using an internet-based sample collected by YouGov for the Center for the Study of Diversity and Democracy at Northwestern University, in collaboration with 23andMe. The study was paid for by 23andMe. Participants were invited to participate in the survey between May 29 and June 5, 2018. The total sample size is 3000 including a nationally representative sample of 1,500 adults 18 years or older, plus over samples of 500 each of Asian American, African American, and Latino American individuals. The margin of error is approximately +/- 3 percent.

Explore further: Poll finds most African-Americans view Black Lives Matter as an effective movement

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Cellular microRNA detection with miRacles

March 26, 2019

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short noncoding regulatory RNAs that can repress gene expression post-transcriptionally and are therefore increasingly used as biomarkers of disease. Detecting miRNAs can be arduous and expensive as ...

What happened before the Big Bang?

March 26, 2019

A team of scientists has proposed a powerful new test for inflation, the theory that the universe dramatically expanded in size in a fleeting fraction of a second right after the Big Bang. Their goal is to give insight into ...

Probiotic bacteria evolve inside mice's GI tracts

March 26, 2019

Probiotics—which are living bacteria taken to promote digestive health—can evolve once inside the body and have the potential to become less effective and sometimes even harmful, according to a new study from Washington ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Aug 16, 2018
In fact, what we think of as race is largely a "social construct," not a biological one, Tillery said. Each person is actually 99.5 percent genetically similar.

Moot point.

1) "Social construct" means two different things: "existing as a result of social activity", and "arbitrarily made up". A car crash is a social construct; human races are social constructs in this sense. It's important to recognize that this is not a matter of anyone's -personal- choice, but as a result of how the society exists as a whole.

2) 0.000001% difference is enough to make one a walking talking Steven Hawking, or a howling retard. As these differences are inherited, they can constitute a "race" and come to define a group's average character. It just depends on where you want to draw the lines.

The definition of races in practice however, has to do with the obvious differences, because people in society have a need to tell one group apart from another without taking a blood sample.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.