Study finds big savings in removing dams over repairs

May 28, 2018, Portland State University
Study finds big savings in removing dams over repairs
Credit: Portland State University

A new study by Portland State University researchers finds billions of dollars could be saved if the nation's aging dams are removed rather than repaired, but also suggests that better data and analysis is needed on the factors driving dam-removal efforts.

The study, published online in May in the journal River Research and Applications, analyzed the best available national data to compare the trends and characteristics of dams that have been removed with those that remain standing.

The researchers expect that if trends continue, by 2050, between 4,000 and 36,000 dams will be removed.

The study found that a high-end cost estimate of removing 36,000 dams would be roughly $25.1 billion, a significant savings over the estimated rehabilitation costs.

The American Society of Civil Engineers estimates more than $45 billion would be needed to repair and upgrade roughly 2,170 high-hazard dams—those that pose the greatest threat to life and property if they fail. The Association of State Dam Safety Officials estimates it would cost $64 billion to rehabilitate all of the U.S. dams that need to be brought up to safe condition, according to the study.

"I think it's time for a re-invigorated public process around managing the risks dams and aging dam infrastructure pose to public safety throughout the U.S.," said Zbigniew Grabowski, a Ph.D. candidate in PSU College of Liberal Arts and Science's Earth, Environment & Society program and the study's lead author. "It's difficult to assess the actual public safety hazards and the most cost-effective ways of mitigating those hazards because the data on dams and dam removals has not been systematically compiled in a way that allows for robust analysis by government agencies or independent researchers."

The study found that hydroelectric and water-supply dams were the types most disproportionately removed, a finding that suggests more nuanced conversations about what drives the removal of dams is necessary.

Grabowski said the choice between removing or rehabilitating dams is often framed as a cost-benefit tradeoff between the ecological, social and economic impacts of dams.

"Yet we should also be looking at how including the public in dam safety decisions might increase the number of dams that don't make sense to rehabilitate," he said.

Among the study's recommendations:

  • More detailed data needs to be made public and data collection on removed and rehabilitated dams needs to be standardized to allow for more robust comparative research and better-informed decisions at the national, state and local levels
  • Dam policy officials and researchers need to take an interdisciplinary approach and draw knowledge from dam engineering, ecological restoration, social science and technology as well as the communities affected by dams and their removals

Explore further: Dam removal study reveals river resiliency

More information: Zbigniew J. Grabowski et al. Fracturing dams, fractured data: Empirical trends and characteristics of existing and removed dams in the United States, River Research and Applications (2018). DOI: 10.1002/rra.3283

Related Stories

Dam removal study reveals river resiliency

April 30, 2015

More than 1000 dams have been removed across the United States because of safety concerns, sediment buildup, inefficiency or having otherwise outlived usefulness. A paper published today in Science finds that rivers are resilient ...

Small dams need better management

February 14, 2012

Many small dams around the world are poorly maintained and represent a safety hazard, according to Pisaniello et al. Better oversight of small dams is needed, the authors argue. The researchers reviewed literature, conducted ...

Recommended for you

Paris climate targets could be exceeded sooner than expected

September 17, 2018

A new study has for the first time comprehensively accounted for permafrost carbon release when estimating emission budgets for climate targets. The results show that the world might be closer to exceeding the budget for ...

More ships and more clouds mean cooling in the Arctic

September 17, 2018

With sea ice in the Arctic melting at an alarming rate, opportunities for trans-Arctic shipping are opening up, and by mid-century ships will be able to sail right over the North Pole—something not previously possible for ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

pubwvj
5 / 5 (1) May 28, 2018
Hydroelectric is perhaps the best form of renewable energy. Properly designed the dams have integrated fish ladders so they do not interfere with spawning fish and on the down stream they can be designed not to harm fish going that way too.

A dam has an ecosystem above it that has adapted to the presence of that water. Removing the dam destroys that ecosystem.

The water is falling from the mountains to the sea. Getting energy from it is almost free and very green. People aren't going to give up electricity for their phones, cars, homes, refrigerators, lights and more.

In my area we have enough old dams to generate all the electrical power of our state. This would make us totally free of fossil fuels for electric generation. No nukes needed. No wind which the NIMBYs complain about. No big solar farms.

Rather than destroying dams we should be fixing or replacing them and generating all the electricity we need.
Anonym402099
not rated yet Jun 20, 2018
Many of these structures act as flood control for down stream cities and properties. Would the cost of flooding in these areas or alternate forms of flood control be less than rehabilitation of the dam?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.