Study reveals the inner workings of a molecular motor that packs and unpacks DNA

Study reveals the inner workings of a molecular motor that packs and unpacks DNA
The architecture of INO80's nucleosome remodeling core. Credit: Hopfner Group

DNA is tightly packed into the nucleus of a cell. Nevertheless, the cellular machinery needs to constantly access the genomic information. An LMU team now reveals the inner workings of a molecular motor made of proteins which packs and unpacks DNA.

The genomic DNA of higher organisms is compacted in a highly condensed form known as chromatin. The DNA is tightly wound around a myriad of tiny histone spools called nucleosomes. A single human cell, for instance, accommodates in this manner about two meters of DNA. However, genes must be constantly transcribed into messenger RNAs to direct protein synthesis. Moreover, the entire DNA must be replicated before cell division and DNA damage needs to be repaired. Thus, there must be way to actively grant access to the genome.

This is when chromatin remodelers come into play. Chromatin remodelers have an essential role as they are molecular machines: they unpick and unpack segments of the DNA by sliding spools back and forth, replacing individual histones, freeing up the DNA for transcription, and finally compacting it again, when the job is done. Since all of this happens in a highly dynamic fashion, chromatin remodelers enable to react rapidly to alterations in their environment – and this holds for brewer's yeast as well as for human cells. In mediating gene accessibility, chromatin remodelers are vital for development and cell differentiation; cell types are defined by the sets of genes they express, remodelers help to determine cell identity.

So far, however, very little is known about what remodeling proteins look like and how they go about doing what they do. In molecular terms, functional remodelers are often very large complexes comprising many different protein components, whose coordinated action makes them akin to molecular machines. These features also make it very difficult to determine their detailed structure. But a team led by Professor Karl-Peter Hopfner, who holds a Chair in Structural Molecular Biology at LMU's Gene Center, has now used cryo-electron microscopy to reconstruct the three-dimensional structure of the nucleosome-sliding remodeler INO80 (which itself consists of 15 subunits) bound to a single nucleosome. "Even with innovative approaches, the best available technology and intensive teamwork, we were always working at the cutting edge," says Dr. Sebastian Eustermann, who worked out the molecular structure of the complex on the basis of of thousands of individual complexes.

By analyzing images of randomly oriented views of the complex formed between INO80 and a nucleosome in the electron micrographs, Hopfner and his team have pieced together its structure at a resolution which has seldom been achieved for a chromatin complex of comparable size. This allowed the researchers to unravel the intricate interaction of the remodeler with its substrate DNA spooled around histones and dissect how the whole machinery works.

From a biochemical point of view, remodelers are responsible for heavy-duty reorganizational tasks. To perform these tasks, they must execute "large-scale conformational changes, which are carried out with astounding precision," says Eustermann. In order to alter the relative positions of nucleosomes, the INO80 complex must first weaken the contacts between the nucleosomal histones and the DNA. A molecular motor which is part of the INO80 complex segmentally detaches the double-stranded DNA from the nucleosome. In doing so, it progressively breaks the contacts that normally keep the DNA tightly wound around the histone particle.

The motor subunit feeds DNA it into the nucleosome. This results in the transient formation of a double-stranded DNA loop that is likely an important intermediate in complex remodeling reactions on the nucleosome. On one hand, the loop exposes some histone proteins that could be replaced by other histones to form a different type of nucleosome. On the other hand, the loop is eventually passed over another subunit and the machine then acts as a ratchet, allowing the nucleosome to "move" on the DNA. Throughout this unpacking process, other subunits in the complex serve to support and stabilize the partially 'denuded' nucleosome itself.

The structure of the complex revealed in the new study sheds new light on the function and mode of action of chromatin remodelers in general. These play an essential part in the workings of the cell by maintaining the flexibility of the , thus enabling the genetic apparatus to respond dynamically to changing metabolic demands. "Our results provide the first well-founded picture of how they do that," says Hopfner. "Moreover, it has recently become clear that remodelers play a central role in tumorigenesis, because they often misregulated in tumor tissue. So structural and mechanistic insights into their functions will be vital for the future development of new therapies for cancer," he adds.

Explore further

Histone exchanger comes into focus

More information: Structural basis for ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling by the INO80 complex. Nature. (2018) DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0029-y
Journal information: Nature

Citation: Study reveals the inner workings of a molecular motor that packs and unpacks DNA (2018, April 12) retrieved 21 August 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Apr 12, 2018
Nothing to see here folks. Just a chance accident that happened long ago.

Apr 17, 2018
they must execute "large-scale conformational changes, which are carried out with astounding precision," says Eustermann

You Must remember, class, that even though these "machines" look like highly advanced technology DESIGNED by some very ingenious mind and put together with technology and techniques unknown to man today, it only appears that way.
This astounding "machine" is nothing more than the product of random chemical and physical processes that occurred billions of years all just happened like so.

Apr 17, 2018
Wow Fred, that is by far your best comment yet!

I'll take it as written (ignore the sarcasm) and give you a 5. You can bookmark this page and show it to your friends and family. Well done.

Apr 17, 2018
Ojorf, you're welcome!
Just remember to watch out for those accidental changes in your own body - you might discover a completely new you in the morning! Have a happy day!
There is none so blind as those who choose not to see the obvious. When was the last time you actually had a sophisticated vitally important function or system develop by accident? With an extremely specific PURPOSE? All by accident? Please take some time out and think about that.

Apr 17, 2018
Well, @FreddyJoe, since none of us have, you know, an odd quarter of a billion years to sit around and wait for it, I would say you're leaving out some pretty important factors.

Here's another factor to consider: evolution isn't accidental, and it isn't random. It's directed by a very powerful force called "natural selection." You might have heard of that. In your no doubt copious education.

And here's something else to consider: laundry detergent enzymes were discovered "by accident." And development of them has proceeded by evolution of bacteria that secrete them; in this case not by natural selection but by human selection. Evolution is a fact, as if the stupidest Neolithic sheep herder couldn't figure that out by breeding sheep. That's evolution too; it's again by human selection not natural selection, but it's still driven by natural variation and by selection by some process, whether natural or human.


Apr 17, 2018
What I can't figure out is how anyone can look at dogs varying from Chihuahuas to Irish wolfhounds, and knowing that all those variations happened "by accident" over a mere couple of thousand years, think that there isn't sufficient variation to start from scratch a quarter or half a billion years ago and not wind up with all the species we see today. It's really pretty stupid.

Over much less than a hundred years, a single species can invade a mountain, then evolve to survive progressively in biomes across that mountain in each direction, then meet on the far side and not be able to breed with one another. Speciation has occurred, and this is common enough that it has a name: ring species. Look it up.

So feel free to demonstrate your ignorance and stupidity and lack of research on the science site any time you like, but be aware, @FreddyJoe, that anyone with any knowledge at all of these matters finds you amusing but trivially so.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more