New method predicts evolution

April 13, 2018, AMOLF
Credit: AMOLF/Sander Tans

Predicting chance-driven evolution seems impossible. Nevertheless, scientists from AMOLF in Amsterdam and the ESPCI in Paris have succeeded in making predictions about the evolution of a set of genes in E. coli. When and how genes mutate remains random, but it appears predictable which gene is more likely to evolve first, or if evolutionary deadlock arises. The results are published on 13 April in the journal Nature Communications.

"Evolution in new environments is inherently unpredictable. Mutations are found to arise randomly in different genes and at different moments," says AMOLF group leader Sander Tans. "In addition, you rarely know beforehand what effect a mutation will have on cellular functions and what the influence of environmental factors is."

Another key complication is that mutations can also indirectly influence each other—a mutation that is unfavorable could actually provide an evolutionary advantage in combination with other mutations.

Protein signaling cascade

Tans and his colleagues investigated the interplay between mutations in two genes within the bacterium E. coli. These genes help to detect the presence of sugar in the environment. The sugar molecules activate the first gene, which in turn activates the second one, and so on. This type of detection system is essential to express and activate genes at the right moment, for instance, enzymes that can degrade sugars. Hence, optimal detection can provide a substantial . "The challenge was to find a way to predict how this system would evolve, says Tans."

"We first developed a theoretical model. But, we quickly realized something quite simple: If one gene gets mutated, then this does not directly affect the properties of another gene. By itself, this does not appear to help our understanding of evolution. But together with previously acquired knowledge on how genes are activated by increased expression, this leads to specific predictions. For instance, that mutations in genes at the end of such a signaling cascade can be advantageous, but that this is more likely when genes at the beginning of the cascade have mutated first. This means that we can predict that evolution proceeds in a certain temporal order, and which genes at the beginning of the cascade have mutated first. Then again, evolutionary deadlock can also occur: A particular gene can only evolve if the other one evolves at the same time. This means that if both genes wait for each other, then nothing will happen."

In addition, Tans and his colleagues checked the predictions experimentally in E. coli. By introducing a range of mutations in both genes, and combining them in all possible sequences, it was possible to check the interactions between the , and hence to verify the predictions.

Evolutionary weather map

Predicting evolution in this manner is somewhat similar to how meteorologists predict the weather. They state the probability of rain, for example. "The point is that a does not have to be exact, like when you shoot a cannonball and can predict quite precisely where it will land," says Tans. "We do not predict where and when arise. Rather, it is about predicting certain limitations of the evolutionary process, and ultimately providing probabilities for different scenarios. Our study reveals that such predictions in evolution are possible. This type of predictive insight could be very useful. For example, it may help to limit the evolution of bacterial resistance to antibiotics by administering antibiotics in certain sequences."

In the longer term, the study raises questions about evolution in other contexts. "Take, for example, the question of whether or not humans still evolve substantially, and what the limitations are," says Tans. "More generally, in evolutionary research, we typically study historically, both in nature and in the lab. But it is also interesting—and useful—to consider what is possible or impossible in the future."

Explore further: Study: How life generates new forms

More information: Philippe Nghe, Manjumatha Kogenaru, Sander Tans, Sign epistasis caused by hierarchy within signaling cascades, Nature Communications, 13 April 2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03644-8

Related Stories

Study: How life generates new forms

April 9, 2018

When organisms change during the course of evolution, often what drives new forms is not genes themselves, but gene regulation —what turns genes on and off. A new study identifies the kind of gene regulation most likely ...

More complex biological systems evolve more freely

December 20, 2017

Our genes (aka. the genotype) determine our characteristics (aka. the phenotype). Evolution acts on changes in the phenotype, which occur when mutations change the underlying genotype. But what changes to the phenotype can ...

Recommended for you

Understanding how to control 'jumping' genes

June 22, 2018

A team of Texas A&M University and Texas AgriLife Research scientists have made a new discovery of how a single protein, Serrate, plays dual roles in controlling jumping genes.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

humy
5 / 5 (1) Apr 16, 2018
This isn't the first time evolution has been shown to not be totally random but rather has a (limited) degree of predictability.

see

https://www.ncbi....3184636/

https://www.scien...2353.htm

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.