Study says Mekong River dams could disrupt lives, environment

Study says Mekong River dams could disrupt lives, environment
Scientists say dams on the main stem of the Mekong River could disrupt lives and drastically alter the environment in the region. Credit: Kenneth Olson, University of Illinois

The Mekong River, one of the world's largest, traverses six Southeast Asian countries and supports the livelihoods of millions of people. New efforts to provide hydroelectric power to a growing and modernizing population include more than eight proposed main-stem dams and 60 or more existing tributary dams in the lower Mekong basin. A new article from University of Illinois and Iowa State University scientists lays out what dam construction could mean for residents and the environment in the region.

"Development projects, such as on the Mekong River and tributaries to support a booming hydropower industry, are bringing great change to ecological, agricultural, and cultural systems in this region," says Kenneth Olson, professor emeritus in the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences at U of I and co-author of the article.

In the article, Olson and co-author Lois Wright Morton provide the context of this unique coupled natural-human river system - its hydrology, geology, ecology, seasonal flood cycle, and human dimensions. They also delve into the politics and the potential effects of the dams, focusing specifically on the Xayaburi Dam in Laos.

Olson and Morton report that construction on the Xayaburi Dam, the first dam south of the China border to be constructed across the main stem of the Mekong River, has been quietly underway for years and is scheduled for completion in 2018. The dam has incited worldwide opposition, as well as local protests and violence.

"Many are concerned that the Xayaburi Hydropower Dam in Laos, could cause irreversible and long-term ecological damage to a river that feeds millions of people, force the resettlement of 2,100, directly affect 202,000 people who use the Mekong bottomlands to produce food, and may push endangered fish, such as Mekong giant catfish, to extinction," Olson says.

Morton, professor emeritus in the Department of Sociology at Iowa State, adds, "The Mekong River and adjacent lands are where the poorest people in Southeast Asia live. Average annual income is less than $200. They make their living from floodplain and riverbank agriculture and fishing. Laos is a mountainous country and the fertile soils are in the floodplains, many of which will be permanently flooded with the construction of these large dams.

"Resettling rural people in uplands means the soils are different, often less fertile and not well suited to rice and vegetable crops they are familiar with. They will need to learn new agricultural practices, different fishing strategies [river vs. lake] and make or purchase different fishing equipment. This kind of change takes time and personal resources that people often don't have," she says.

Olson points out that the dams also affect the seasonal pulse of the river, change fish diversity and abundance, and impact downstream water flows and availability. "Further, dams trap sediment needed as a nutrient source for fish, block fish migration, and reduce the amount of sediment deposited in the Mekong Delta," he says. "Lower Mekong River levels have accelerated saltwater intrusion into the delta region, adversely affecting rice production, and have contributed to ground water pollution."

The Mekong River Commission was established in 1995 by Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam to coordinate competing interests and assure the river is protected for current and future uses. However the commission is often set back by government roadblocks and receives limited support from two adjacent upstream countries, China and Myanmar, who also use the Mekong.

"The MRC is only powerful if the countries that fund it give respect and authority to its rules and regulations, even if they don't always agree with them. This is a difficult governance challenge which they are working through," Morton says.

Ultimately, the Mekong River presents a huge opportunity for hydropower to modernize Laos, but Olson and Morton argue human and environmental concerns are at risk. They advocate for governments in Southeast Asia to empower the MRC to carry out its mission to mitigate the negative impacts of dam building while realizing the benefits.

Explore further

Vietnam warns of dire impact from planned Mekong dams

More information: Kenneth R. Olson et al, Water rights and fights: Lao dams on the Mekong River, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (2018). DOI: 10.2489/jswc.73.2.35A
Citation: Study says Mekong River dams could disrupt lives, environment (2018, March 8) retrieved 14 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 08, 2018
Busy-body Western environmentalists should LEAVE other countries to make their own choices on their environments.

Mar 22, 2018

It is amazing how now the National Geographic tries to tie everything to "climate change". I have been to Angkor Wat three times over a period of 13 years and there have been many changes that have nothing to do with the climate. Nowhere in this article is mentioned the fact that it was the flooding of Tonle Sap Lake when the Mekong backed up into the Tonle Sap River and created the most productive fresh water fishery in the world. This will all change when the Chinese complete a series of dams in the Mekong River that will prevent this annual event from happening. It was more being invaded by the Siamese army as well as forces from modern day Vietnam that cause the decline.

Mar 22, 2018
"The destruction of this bridge is suggestive of a huge flow of water, far more than the canal could cope with, coming down through the middle of the city," said Penny, who is a researcher in the geosciences department at the University of Sydney. "It did a huge amount of damage to infrastructure that people who were living here at the time simply couldn't repair." If they were able to build it in the first place they surely would be able to repair it. Does that mean that the I-35W Mississippi River bridge in MN that fell down mean that America is finished and can't repair this bridge & was this caused by CO₂ induce climate change like the National Geographic is trying to make us believe that everything from bad breath to rings around the sun are caused by this essential trace gas?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more