Mother-child left-side face-to-face preference found to extend to walruses and Indian flying foxes

January 10, 2018 by Bob Yirka, Phys.org report
Left visual field positioning in walrus. (a) Face-to-face resting in mother and calf. (b) Calf floating on the side of the mother prior to diving for suckling. Credit: Biology Letters (2018). DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0707

A team of researchers with Saint Petersburg State University and the Institute of Experimental Medicine, both in Russia, has found that a left-side face-to-face preference seen in primates also extends to non-primate marine and terrestrial mammals, specifically walruses and Indian flying foxes. In their paper published in the journal Biology Letters, the group describes their study of the two species and the interactions they witnessed between mothers and their offspring and what they learned by doing so.

Prior research has shown that human mothers favor a left-side approach when holding their babies face-to-face, meaning that both mother and child look to their left to see the other. Other research has shown that other primates also have a similar left-side face-to-face preference. Also, there has been some evidence showing that some non-primates also have a left-side preference in general, though not necessarily in face-to-face interactions. In this new effort, the researchers looked to find out if non-primate mammals do indeed have the same left-side face-to-face preferences as primates. To find out they chose to study one marine species and one terrestrial.

The team watched in the wild interacting on Kolyuchin Island north of the Bering Strait. In all, 73 mothers were observed interacting with their offspring. They also ventured to Sri Lanka to watch Indian flying foxes interact with their young—they recorded the interactions of 226 pairs. The researchers report that they found a strong preference for carrying their young in both species such that they would remain facing left when looking at each other face-to-face. The also found a strong preference in the young to keep the mother in their left-facing field of view when not being held. These findings, the researchers suggest, indicate that left-side preference in face-to-face mother-child interactions extends to non-primates.

While it has not been proven, it has been suggested that left-side preference aids in communication between mother and child because visual information from the left is processed in the right hemisphere of the brain, which prior research has shown is highly involved in processing social information. Some have also suggested that the left side of the face is more expressive. And now that it has been found to extend to non-primates, it appears likely, the researchers suggest, that the behavior has an ancient origin.

Explore further: Survey of multiple species suggests mother's preference for cradling baby on left tied to bonding

More information: Andrey Giljov et al. Facing each other: mammal mothers and infants prefer the position favouring right hemisphere processing, Biology Letters (2018). DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0707

Abstract
The right hemisphere plays a crucial role in social processing. Human mothers show a robust left cradling/holding bias providing greater right-hemispheric involvement in the exchange of social information between mother and infant. Here, we demonstrate that a similar bias is evident in face-to-face spatial interactions in marine and terrestrial non-primate mammals. Walruses and Indian flying foxes showed a significant population-level preference for the position which facilitates the use of the left visual field in both mother and infant. This behavioural lateralization may have emerged owing to benefits conferred by the enhanced right-hemispheric social processing providing the mother and infant an optimal perception of each other.

Related Stories

Developing fetuses react to face-like shapes from the womb

June 8, 2017

It's well known that young babies are more interested in faces than other objects. Now, researchers reporting in Current Biology on June 8 have the first evidence that this preference for faces develops in the womb. By projecting ...

Medaka fish use faces to identify different individuals

November 29, 2017

For many animals including humans, the ability to identify different individuals among their own kind is an essential ability for everyday living. Faces are the most important body part for individual recognition in many ...

Transient topical corticosteroids of limited use in acne

November 2, 2016

(HealthDay)—Transient addition of topical corticosteroids (TCS) to topical retinoids is not associated with meeting the primary end points of improvement in acne severity and mitigation of medication-induced irritation, ...

Rhesus monkeys found to see faces in inanimate objects too

August 28, 2017

A team of researchers at the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health has found that rhesus monkeys, like humans, recognize face-like traits in inanimate objects. In their study published in the journal Current Biology, the ...

Recommended for you

How plants bind their green pigment chlorophyll

October 19, 2018

Chlorophyll is the pigment used by all plants for photosynthesis. There are two versions, chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b. These are structurally very similar to one another but have different colors, blue-green and yellowish ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

krundoloss
not rated yet Jan 10, 2018
It would make sense that you hold your child in your left hand so that your stronger right hand can handle tasks, or defend the child, climb a tree, etc. This basic need would probably cause some evolutionary preferences over time. Of course the interaction with hemispheres of the brain makes sense as a neurological cause for the behavior.
Dug
not rated yet Jan 10, 2018
Exactly. This is an insignificant result of dominant right handedness and will extend into all the species that have a dominant/preferential right handed hemispherical dominance as relates to "muscle memory" storage. It has nothing to do with "social processing" and is more decided by genetics and prior to any "social processing" credibly beginings. Most of which science has already been pretty well established. Researcher needs to broaden her background work and perspectives.
El_Nose
5 / 5 (1) Jan 10, 2018
you guys ever notice that left handed people still hold babies the same way?
sirdumpalot
not rated yet Jan 11, 2018
What about AS/autistic parents? I'm a guy right handed, so I think I read this effect is weaker, but my kid only ever sits on my right. For the first 18 months, if I held him on my left he'd jolt towards the other side instantly.. mum's still left though!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.