Mother-child left-side face-to-face preference found to extend to walruses and Indian flying foxes

Mother-child left-side face-to-face preference found to extend to walruses and Indian flying foxes
Left visual field positioning in walrus. (a) Face-to-face resting in mother and calf. (b) Calf floating on the side of the mother prior to diving for suckling. Credit: Biology Letters (2018). DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0707

A team of researchers with Saint Petersburg State University and the Institute of Experimental Medicine, both in Russia, has found that a left-side face-to-face preference seen in primates also extends to non-primate marine and terrestrial mammals, specifically walruses and Indian flying foxes. In their paper published in the journal Biology Letters, the group describes their study of the two species and the interactions they witnessed between mothers and their offspring and what they learned by doing so.

Prior research has shown that human mothers favor a left-side approach when holding their babies face-to-face, meaning that both mother and child look to their left to see the other. Other research has shown that other primates also have a similar left-side face-to-face preference. Also, there has been some evidence showing that some non-primates also have a left-side preference in general, though not necessarily in face-to-face interactions. In this new effort, the researchers looked to find out if non-primate mammals do indeed have the same left-side face-to-face preferences as primates. To find out they chose to study one marine species and one terrestrial.

The team watched in the wild interacting on Kolyuchin Island north of the Bering Strait. In all, 73 mothers were observed interacting with their offspring. They also ventured to Sri Lanka to watch Indian flying foxes interact with their young—they recorded the interactions of 226 pairs. The researchers report that they found a strong preference for carrying their young in both species such that they would remain facing left when looking at each other face-to-face. The also found a strong preference in the young to keep the mother in their left-facing field of view when not being held. These findings, the researchers suggest, indicate that left-side preference in face-to-face mother-child interactions extends to non-primates.

While it has not been proven, it has been suggested that left-side preference aids in communication between mother and child because visual information from the left is processed in the right hemisphere of the brain, which prior research has shown is highly involved in processing social information. Some have also suggested that the left side of the face is more expressive. And now that it has been found to extend to non-primates, it appears likely, the researchers suggest, that the behavior has an ancient origin.

Explore further

Survey of multiple species suggests mother's preference for cradling baby on left tied to bonding

More information: Andrey Giljov et al. Facing each other: mammal mothers and infants prefer the position favouring right hemisphere processing, Biology Letters (2018). DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0707

The right hemisphere plays a crucial role in social processing. Human mothers show a robust left cradling/holding bias providing greater right-hemispheric involvement in the exchange of social information between mother and infant. Here, we demonstrate that a similar bias is evident in face-to-face spatial interactions in marine and terrestrial non-primate mammals. Walruses and Indian flying foxes showed a significant population-level preference for the position which facilitates the use of the left visual field in both mother and infant. This behavioural lateralization may have emerged owing to benefits conferred by the enhanced right-hemispheric social processing providing the mother and infant an optimal perception of each other.

Journal information: Biology Letters

© 2018

Citation: Mother-child left-side face-to-face preference found to extend to walruses and Indian flying foxes (2018, January 10) retrieved 16 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jan 10, 2018
It would make sense that you hold your child in your left hand so that your stronger right hand can handle tasks, or defend the child, climb a tree, etc. This basic need would probably cause some evolutionary preferences over time. Of course the interaction with hemispheres of the brain makes sense as a neurological cause for the behavior.

Jan 10, 2018
Exactly. This is an insignificant result of dominant right handedness and will extend into all the species that have a dominant/preferential right handed hemispherical dominance as relates to "muscle memory" storage. It has nothing to do with "social processing" and is more decided by genetics and prior to any "social processing" credibly beginings. Most of which science has already been pretty well established. Researcher needs to broaden her background work and perspectives.

Jan 10, 2018
you guys ever notice that left handed people still hold babies the same way?

Jan 11, 2018
What about AS/autistic parents? I'm a guy right handed, so I think I read this effect is weaker, but my kid only ever sits on my right. For the first 18 months, if I held him on my left he'd jolt towards the other side instantly.. mum's still left though!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more