Study suggests female advantage in life expectancy related to fundamental biological roots

January 9, 2018 by Bob Yirka, Phys.org report
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

A small team of researchers from Denmark and Germany has found evidence that suggests a biological reason for why women live longer than men. In their paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the group outlines their study which involved analyzing survival data from several periods in history when groups of people were subjected to extreme duress.

Most everyone knows that , on average, live longer than men. But nobody knows why. Some have suggested it is because men behave more recklessly. Others have suggested it might have to do with not having a spare X chromosome, while others yet, have suggested it might have something to do with . In this new effort, the researchers sought to learn more about differences in by looking at survival rates for people undergoing extreme duress.

The researchers focused on a period of slave trading in Trinidad, a time period during which slaves freed in America were attempting to survive in Libera, a measles epidemic in Iceland and famines in Ukraine, Sweden and Ireland. In all such cases, except Trinidad, the researchers report, women lived longer than men. Trinidad was an exception, they note, likely because slave traders placed more value on them and thus put greater effort into keeping them alive. They note also that differences in life expectancy were mostly due to infant mortality rates.

Particularly notable was the famine data—in the Irish potato famine, for example, which occurred roughly over the period 1845 to 1849, men had a typical lifespan of just 18.17 years, while for women it was 22.4. But prior to the famine, both groups had a life expectancy of approximately 38 years. Data from other famines was roughly similar, which, the researchers claim, suggests that there must be a biological root for the differences in life expectancy. It is doubtful, they note, that in infants could have made a difference in , leaving a biological source as the only reasonable possibility.

The team was not able to pinpoint what sort of biological advantage women might have over men, of course, but note that estrogen is known to be anti-inflammatory and that testosterone may actually cause problems for the immune system.

Explore further: 175 years on, study finds where you live still determines your life expectancy

More information: Virginia Zarulli et al. Women live longer than men even during severe famines and epidemics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2018). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1701535115

Abstract
Women in almost all modern populations live longer than men. Research to date provides evidence for both biological and social factors influencing this gender gap. Conditions when both men and women experience extremely high levels of mortality risk are unexplored sources of information. We investigate the survival of both sexes in seven populations under extreme conditions from famines, epidemics, and slavery. Women survived better than men: In all populations, they had lower mortality across almost all ages, and, with the exception of one slave population, they lived longer on average than men. Gender differences in infant mortality contributed the most to the gender gap in life expectancy, indicating that newborn girls were able to survive extreme mortality hazards better than newborn boys. Our results confirm the ubiquity of a female survival advantage even when mortality is extraordinarily high. The hypothesis that the survival advantage of women has fundamental biological underpinnings is supported by the fact that under very harsh conditions females survive better than males even at infant ages when behavioral and social differences may be minimal or favor males. Our findings also indicate that the female advantage differs across environments and is modulated by social factors.

Press release

Related Stories

European women live longer than men, but not better

August 29, 2011

European women live longer than men, because of both biological and behavioural advantages, but women's longer lives are not necessarily healthy lives. Studies commented on by Dr Vannuzzo at the ESC Congress 2011, show that ...

Type 2 diabetes linked to shorter lifespan

November 6, 2017

Type 2 diabetes is linked to lower life expectancy regardless of a person's socioeconomic status, a Scotland-wide study suggests. The research, involving more than three million people, could help scientists understand more ...

Recommended for you

A world of parasites

May 25, 2018

Alex Betts, Craig MacLean and Kayla King from the Department of Zoology, shed light on their recent research published in Science, which addressed the impact that parasite communities have on evolutionary change and diversity.

A better B1 building block

May 25, 2018

Humans aren't the only earth-bound organisms that need to take their vitamins. Thiamine – commonly known as vitamin B1 – is vital to the survival of most every living thing on earth. But the average bacterium or plant ...

Bumblebees confused by iridescent colors

May 25, 2018

Iridescence is a form of structural colour which uses regular repeating nanostructures to reflect light at slightly different angles, causing a colour-change effect.

Plant symbioses—fragile partnerships

May 25, 2018

All plants require an adequate supply of inorganic nutrients, such as fixed nitrogen (usually in the form of ammonia or nitrate), for growth. A special group of flowering plants thus depends on close symbiotic relationships ...

6 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rderkis
3 / 5 (4) Jan 10, 2018
Why do google employees get fired for saying these kind of facts?
elisevil
not rated yet Jan 10, 2018
The physical advantage is the evolved extra fat percentages that let women survive with pregnancy easier during a winter or famine.
Psycheworks
not rated yet Jan 11, 2018
In animals it's simple you don't need as many males to survive as you do females, one local male can impregnate lots of females. Females need to survive for the continuation of a species
rderkis
1 / 5 (1) Jan 11, 2018
OK, elisevil, Psycheworks your both fired for demeaning and hurting mens feelings!
Truth and facts have are irrelevant.
mackita
1 / 5 (1) Jan 12, 2018
Maybe women survive better because their husbands & friends leave some food to them even during hunger and famines. Or maybe because they are able to get the food by work of their children or by prostitution. I'm not saying, it's generally so - but the above study carefully links the vitality of women to "fundamental biological roots" without deeper reasoning - which is against standard scientific method.
rderkis
1 / 5 (1) Jan 12, 2018
mackita, your fired to, just for talking about a politically banned subject.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.